^{page 119 note 1} HMC, Laing MSS, I, 99–100 Google Scholar. To avoid confusion, William Cecil, later Lord Burghley, is generally referred to throughout this article as Burghley, and his son, Robert Cecil, later Earl of Salisbury, as Cecil.

^{page 120 note 1} Collins, A., Life of William Cecil, London 1732, 11–12.Google Scholar

^{page 120 note 2} Ibid. 12.

^{page 122 note 1} Harleian Miscellany, ed. Park, T., 1810, v, 293-313.Google Scholar

^{page 122 note 2} Read, C., Mr. Secretary Cecil and Queen Elizabeth, 1955, 241.Google Scholar

^{page 122 note 3} Read, C., Lord Burghley and Queen Elizabeth, 1960, 297-8.Google Scholar

^{page 123 note 1} Advice to a Son, ed. Wright, L. B., New York, 1962, 11.Google Scholar

^{page 123 note 2} His will is printed in A. Collins, op. cit. 80-98.

^{page 123 note 3} Conyers Read, Mr. Secretary Cecil, 134.

^{page 123 note 4} Ibid. 261.

^{page 123 note 5} Conyers Read, Lord Burghley, 114.

^{page 124 note 1} A. Collins, op. cit. 55-6.

^{page 124 note 2} Clapham, J., Elizabeth of England, ed. Plummer, Evelyn and Read, Conyers, 1951, 80.Google Scholar

^{page 125 note 1} This is pointed out in Read, Conyers, Lord Burghley, 565, n.49.Google Scholar

^{page 125 note 2} Ibid. 120.

^{page 126 note 1} C. Read, Mr. Secretary Cecil, 105.

^{page 126 note 2} C. Read, Lord Burghley, 117.

^{page 127 note 1} C. Read, Mr. Secretary Cecil, 359.

^{page 127 note 2} C. Read, Lord Burghley, 114.

^{page 127 note 3} H. Carlson, The Writings of Henry Barrow, 1962, 188.

^{page 128 note 1} C. Read, Lord Burghley, 295.

^{page 128 note 2} C. Read, Mr. Secretary Cecil, 463-4.

^{page 128 note 3} Harleian Miscellany, 1809, II, 137-55.

^{page 130 note 1} Strype, J., Annals of the Reformation, Oxford 1824, iv, 480.Google Scholar

^{page 131 note 1} Correspondence of James VI with Sir Robert Cecil and others in England, ed. J. Bruce (Camden Soc. lxxviii, 1861), 33.

^{page 131 note 2} The Correspondence of Matthew Hutton, Surtees Soc., XVII (1843), 94.

^{page 131 note 3} HMC, Salisbury MSS, v, 95.Google Scholar

^{page 132 note 1} Smith, A. G. R., ‘Sir Michael Hickes and the Secretariat of the Cecils, circa 1580-1612,’ 187 (unpublished London Ph.D. thesis, 1962)Google Scholar.

^{page 132 note 2} Hill, J. E. C., Economic Problems of the Church, Oxford 1956.Google Scholar

^{page 133 note 1} Usher, R. G., The Reconstruction of the English Church, New York 1910, 1, 114-5Google Scholar.

^{page 133 note 2} E.g. C. Read, Lord Burghley, 297; CSP Domestic, 1603-10, 189.

^{page 133 note 3} R. G. Usher, op. cit. 11, 257. See also Babbage, S. B., Puritanism and Richard Bancroft, 1962, 313 ff.Google Scholar

^{page 134 note 1} CSP Domestic, 1601-3, 37.

^{page 134 note 2} CSP Domestic, 1603-10, 278.

^{page 134 note 3} Ibid. 313.

^{page 134 note 4} Winwood, Ralph, Memorials of Affairs of State, ed. Sawyer, E., 1725, III, 49.Google Scholar

^{page 135 note 1} C. Read, Lord Burghley, 431-3.

^{page 135 note 2} For a discussion of this controversy, see my ‘The succession struggle in late Elizabethan England’ in Elizabethan Government and Society, ed. Bindoff, S. T., Hurstfield, J., and Williams, C. H., 1961, 369–96.Google Scholar

^{page 135 note 3} Cited in Cecil, A., A Life of Robert Cecil, 1915, 231.Google Scholar

^{page 136 note 1} CSP, Venetian, x, 229.Google Scholar

^{page 136 note 2} Ibid. 230.

^{page 136 note 3} HMC, Rutland MSS, I, 420.Google Scholar

^{page 136 note 4} Jordan, W. K., The Development of Religious Toleration in England, 1603-1640, 1936, 28.Google Scholar

^{page 136 note 5} HMC, Salisbury MSS, xi, 148.Google Scholar

^{page 137 note 1} Prerogative Court of Canterbury Wills, 49 Fermer.

^{page 138 note 1} I assume that the passage within parenthesis ends here, but the parenthesis has been omitted in the original.

^{page 139 note 1} The Political Works of James I, ed. McIlwain, C. H., 1918, xxx.Google Scholar

^{page 140 note 1} Strype, J., Annals, iv, 545-9.Google Scholar