Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-rvbq7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T01:23:39.981Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Language Reversion Revisited

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2008

Kees De Bot  and
Michael Clyne
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the 1970s, Clyne conducted linguistic research on German-English and Dutch-English bilinguals in Australia. In the course of the study, he found evidence for second language attrition and first language reversion among his elderly informants (Clyne, 1981). In 1987, some 40 of the 200 Dutch informants tested in 1971 were retested in order to get longitudinal data on language maintenance and loss. The data show surprisingly little loss of proficiency in both Dutch and English over the years. This calls for a revision of the language reversion hypothesis as stated by Clyne in 1981. In the present article the hypothesis is modified to the extent that there seems to be some kind of “critical threshold” (Neisser, 1984) that has to be reached in order to retain the second language. First language reversion seems to be a common phenomenon among those immigrants who did not reach this threshold, but not among immigrants who did.

Type
Research Article
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , June 1989 , pp. 167 - 177
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Australian Institute of Multicultural Affairs (AIMA). (1983). The ethnic aged project. Second biennial meeting of members. Melbourne: AIMA.Google Scholar
Albert, M., & Obler, L. (1978). The bilingual brain. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Bāckman, L. (1985). Compensation and recoding: A framework for aging and memory research. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 26, 193–207.Google Scholar
Bahrick, H. (1984). Fifty years of second language attrition: Implications for programmatic research. Modern Language Journal, 68, 105–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, J. (1981). Conscious and automatic processes in language learning. The Canadian Modern Language Journal, 37, 462–474.10.3138/cmlr.37.3.462Google Scholar
Clyne, M. (1967). Transference and triggering. The Hague: Nijholl.Google Scholar
Clyne, M. (1977a). Bilingualism of the elderly. Talanya, 4, 45–65.Google Scholar
Clyne, M. (1977b). Nieuw Hollands or Double Dutch. Dutch Studies, 3, 1–30.Google Scholar
Clyne, M. (1981). Deutsch als Muttersprache in Australien. Wiesbaden: Steiner.Google Scholar
Cumming, E., & Henry, W. (1961). Growing old. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
De Bot, K., Gommans, P., & Rossing, C. (in press). L1-loss in an L2-environment: Dutch immigrants in France. In Seliger, H. & Vago, R. (Eds.), First language attrition: Structural and theoretical perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dorian, N. (1977). The problem of the semi-speaker in language death. Linguistics, 191, 23–32.Google Scholar
Harwood, E., & Naylor, G. (1969). Recall and recognition in elderly and young subjects. Australian Journal of Psychology, 21, 251–257.Google Scholar
Hasselmo, N. (1961). American Swedish. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Howard University, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Hearst, S. (1981). Ethnic communities and their aged. Richmond, NSW: CHOMI.Google Scholar
Hyltenstam, K., & Stroud, C. (1985). The psycholinguistics of language choice and code-switching in Alzheimer's dementia: Some hypotheses. In Viberg, A. (Ed.), Bilingualism and second language acquisition (Scandinavian Working Papers on Bilingualism 4). Stockholm: University of Stockholm.Google Scholar
Kjaer, I., & Bauman Larsen, M. (1974). “De Messy Ting”. In Andersen, P. (Ed.), Festskrift til Kristian Hold (pp. 421–430). Copenhagen: Akademisk Verlag.Google Scholar
Lippmann, W. (1977). The importance of ethnically based agencies to immigrant families. CHOMI Reprints, 1.Google Scholar
Logan, G. (1977). Developing conversational skills in individualized foreign language programs: A systematic approach. System, 5, 124–132.Google Scholar
Neisser, U. (1984). Interpreting Harry Bahrick's discovery: What confers immunity against forgetting? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 32–35.10.1037/0096-3445.113.1.32Google Scholar
Neugarten, B. (1977). Personality and aging. In Birren, J. & Warner Schai, K. (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
Overberg, H. (1981). Dutch in Victoria 1947–1980: Community and ideology. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 2, 17–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rivers, W. (1972). Talking off the tops of their heads. TESOL Quarterly, 6, 71–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, H. (1983). Fundamental concepts of language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wimer, R., & Wigdor, B. (1958). Age differences in retention of learning. Journal of Gerontology, 13, 291–295.10.1093/geronj/13.3.291CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed