Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T17:22:42.511Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Psychological Constraints on the Teachability of Languages*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2008

Manfred Pienemann
Manfred Pienemann
Affiliation:
University of Sydney
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This paper reports on the influence of formal instruction on L2 acquisition in an instructional experiment with child learners. The main tendency of the findings is that a structure can only be learned under instruction if the learner's interlanguage has already reached a stage one step prior to the acquisition of the structure to be taught.

My hypothesis for an explanation suggests that the teachability of L2 structures is constrained by the same processing restrictions that determine the developmental sequences of natural L2 acquisition: since the processing procedures of each stage build upon the procedures of the preceding stage there is no way to leave out a stage of the developmental sequence by the means of formal teaching. Following such a processing capacity approach I reject the assumption that the constraints on teachability can be explained on the basis of linguistic input.

Type
Research Notes
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , Spring 1984 , pp. 186 - 214
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, R.W. (ed.) in press: Pidginization, creolization and language acquisition. Rowley, Mass: Newbury HouseGoogle Scholar
Berman, R. 1982: Cognitive principles and language acquisition. Paper presented at the Second European-North American Workshop on Cross-Linguistic Second Language Acquisition Research, Göhrde, West-Germany, 08 1982Google Scholar
Bever, Th. 1970: The cognitive basis for linguistic structures, in: J.R. Hayes (ed.), 279–362.Google Scholar
Bever, Th. 1981: Normal acquisition processes explain the critical period for language learning, in: Diller Karl C. (ed.) 1981, 176–198Google Scholar
Bever, Th. & Townsend, D. 1979: Perceptual mechanisms and formal properties of main and subordinate clauses, in: Cooper W. & E. Walker (eds.), 159–226Google Scholar
Bloom, L. & Lahey, M. 1978: Language development and language disorders. Wiley & Sons: New YorkGoogle Scholar
Burt, M. & Dulay, H. (eds.) 1975: Second language learning, teaching and bilingual education. Washington: TESOLGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H. 1978: Syntax oder Produktionsstrategien? Zum natürlichen Zweitspracherwerb der Gastarbeiter, in Kloepfer, R. et al. (eds.) 343–354Google Scholar
Clahsen, H. 1980: Psycholinguistic aspects of L2 acquisition: word order phenomena in foreign workers' interlanguage. in: Felix, S.W. (ed.) 57–79Google Scholar
Clahsen, H. 1981: The acquisition of German word order: a test case for cognitive approaches to L2 development. Paper presented at the First European-North American Workshop on Cross-Linguistic Second Language Acquisition Research, Lake Arrowhead, California Sept.09 1981Google Scholar
Clahsen, H. 1982: Autonomy and interaction in (second) language acquisition research: evidence for an integrativist position. Paper presented at the Second European-North American Workshop on Cross-Linguistic Second Language Acquisition Research. Göhrde, West Germany, 08 1982Google Scholar
Clahsen, H. 1982a: Spracherwerb in der Kindheit. Eine Untersuchung zur Entwicklung der Syntax in der Kindheit. Narr: TübingenGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H., & Meisel, J.M. & Pienemann, M. 1983: Deutsch als Zweitsprache. Der Spracherwerb ausländischer Arbeiter. Narr: TübingenGoogle Scholar
Cooper, W. & Walker, E. (eds.) 1979: Sentence processing: psycholinguistic studies presented to Merril Garrett. New YorkGoogle Scholar
Cross, T. 1977: Mother's speech adjustments: the contribution of selected child listener variables, in: Snow, C. & Ch. Ferguson (eds.), 151–188Google Scholar
Dietrich, R. & Kaufmann, Th. & Storch, G. 1979: Beobachtungen zum gesteuerten Fremdsprachenerwerb. Linguistische Berichte 64, 56–81Google Scholar
Diller, K.C. (ed.) 1981: Individual differences and universals in language learning aptitude. Newbury House: RowleyGoogle Scholar
Dulay, H. & Burt, M. 1973: Should we teach children syntax? Language Learning 23, 235–252Google Scholar
Felix, S.W. 1978: Zur Relation zwischen natürlichem und gesteuertem Zweitsprachener-werb. in Kloepfer, R. et al. (eds.) 355–370Google Scholar
Felix, S.W. (ed.) 1980: Second language development. Trends and issues. TübingenGoogle Scholar
Felix, S.W. 1981: The effect of formal instruction on second language acquisition. Language Learning 32, 87–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felix, S.W. 1982: Psycholinguistische Aspekte des Zweitsprachenerwerbs. Narr: TübingenGoogle Scholar
Felix, S.W. & Simmet, A. 1981: Der Erwerb der Personalpronomina im Fremdsprachenunterricht. Neusprachliche Mitteilungen 3, 132–144Google Scholar
Felix, S.W. & Wode, H. (eds.) 1983: Language development at the cross-roads: papers from the Interdisciplinary Conference on Language Acquisition at Passau. Narr: TübingenGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, Ch.A. & Slobin, D.I. (eds.) 1973: Studies of child language development. New YorkGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J.A. & Bever, Th. & Garrett, M. 1974: The psychology of language. An introduction to psycholinguistics and generative grammar. New York: McGraw-HillGoogle Scholar
Forster, K.I. 1979: Levels of processing and the structure of the language processor, in: Cooper & Walker (eds.), 27–85Google Scholar
Hahn, A. 1982: Fremdsprachenunterricht und Spracherwerb. Linguistische Untersuchungen zum gesteuerten Zweitsprachenerwerb. Ph.D. dissertation. University of PassauGoogle Scholar
Hayes, J.R. (ed.) 1970: Cognition and the development of language. New YorkGoogle Scholar
Heuer, H. 1976: Lerntheorie des Englischunterrichts. Untersuchungen zur Analyse Fremdsprachlicher Lernprozesse. HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
Hüllen, W. & Jung, L. 1979: Sprachstruktur und Spracherwerb. DüsseldorfGoogle Scholar
Jungblut, G. 1874: Terminologie er Lehr-und Lernphasen im Fremdsprachenunterricht. Linguistik und Didaktik 17, 33–41Google Scholar
Kloepfer, R. et al. (eds.) 1979: Bildung und Ausbildung in der Romania. Vol. II. München: FinkGoogle Scholar
Krashen, S. 1981: Second language acquisition and second language learning. Pergamon: OxfordGoogle Scholar
Krashen, S. 1982: Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamon: OxfordGoogle Scholar
Krashen, S. & Madden, C. & Bailey, N. 1975: Theoretical aspects of grammatical sequencing, in: Burt, M. & H. Dulay (eds.) 44–54Google Scholar
Lightbown, P. 1982: Classroom language as input to second language acquisition. Paper presented at the Second European-North American Workshop on Cross-Linguistic Second Language Acquisition Research, Göhrde, West Germany, 08 1982Google Scholar
Lightbown, P. 1982. in press: Exploring relationships between developmental and instructional sequences in L2 acquisition, in Seliger, H. & M. Long (eds.)Google Scholar
Long, M. 1982: Does second language instruction make a difference? A review of research. Paper presented at the TESOL Research Committee's state-of-the-art session, TESOL Convention, Honolulu, 05 1982Google Scholar
Meisel, J.M. 1980: Strategies of second language acquisition, in: R.W. Andersen (ed.) in pressGoogle Scholar
Meisel, J.M. & Clahsen, H. & Pienemann, M. 1981: On determining developmental stages in natural second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 3 (2), 109–135Google Scholar
Newport, E. & Gleitman, H. & Gleitman, L. 1977: Mother, I'd rather do it myself: some effects and non-effects of maternal speech style, in: Snow, C. & Ch. Ferguson (eds.) 109–149Google Scholar
Neisser, U. 1967: Cognitive psychology. New YorkGoogle Scholar
Pica, T. 1982a: The role of linguistic environment in second language acquisition of the English indefinite article. MS University of PennsylvaniaGoogle Scholar
Pica, T. 1982b: Adult acquisition of English as a second language in different language contexts. MS University of PennsylvaniaGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M. 1978: Erwerbssequenzen und Lernprogression. Überlegungen zur Steuerung des Zweitspracherwerbs. in: Kloepfer, R. et al. (eds.) 1979, 397–416Google Scholar
Pienemann, M. 1980: The second language acquisition of immigrant children, in: S.W. Felix (ed.) 1980, 41–56Google Scholar
Pienemann, M. 1981: Der Zweitspracherwerb ausländischer Arbeiterkinder. Bouvier: BonnGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M. 1982a: Untersuchungen zur Synchronisierung von natürlichem und gesteuertem Zweitspracherwerb—Projektbeschreibung. Deutsch lernen 1/82, 81–87Google Scholar
Pienemann, M. 1982b: Towards the critical period hypothesis for L2 acquisition. Comparing child and adult acquisition processes. MS University of PassauGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M. in press: Learnability and syllabus construction, in: Hyltenstam, & Pienemann, (eds.): Modelling and assessing second language acquisition. Multilingual matters, Clevedon.Google Scholar
Pienemann, M. 1984: The effect of instruction on learner's orientations in L2 acquisition. MS University of Sydney.Google Scholar
Schöler, H. 1982: Zur Entwicklung des Verstehens inkonsistenter Äußerungen. Fischer: FechtenheimGoogle Scholar
Selliger, H. & Long, M. (eds.) in press: Classroom language acquisition and use: new perspectives. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury HouseGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D.I. 1973: Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar, in: Ferguson, Ch.A. & Slobin, D.I. (eds.), 175–208Google Scholar
Slobin, D.I. 1975: Language change in childhood and history. Working Papers of the Language Behavior Research Laboratory, No.41, University of California, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
Snow, C. & Ferguson, Ch. (eds.) 1977: Talking to children: language input and acquisition. Cambridge University Press: CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Stohner, H. & Nelson, K. 1974: The young child's development of sentence comprehension: influence of event probability, non-verbal context, syntactic form and their strategies. Child Development 45, 567–576Google Scholar
Swain, M. & Lapkin, S. 1982: Evaluating bilingual education. ClevedonGoogle Scholar
Vogel, K. & Vogel, S. 1975: Lernpsychologie und Fremdsprachenerwerb. TübingenGoogle Scholar
Wode, H. 1981: Learning a second language. I. An integrated view of language acquisition. Narr: TübingenGoogle Scholar