Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-lrf7s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T18:11:32.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

CLASSROOM LEARNERS’ ACQUISITION OF THE SPANISH COPULA WITH ADJECTIVES

THE CASE OF KOREAN LEARNERS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2021

Avizia Yim Long Open the ORCID record for Avizia Yim Long [Opens in a new window]
Avizia Yim Long*
Affiliation:
San José State University
*
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Avizia Yim Long, Department of World Languages and Literatures, San José State University, 1 Washington Square, San José, CA 95192. E-mail: avizia.long@sjsu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Research on the second language (L2) acquisition of the Spanish copulas has been central to our understanding of key concepts and issues in the field of SLA such as stages of development and variability in L2s. However, this research has focused nearly exclusively on native English-speaking learners. The present study examined native Korean-speaking learners’ acquisition and use of the Spanish copulas with adjectives in oral production. Analyses of the range and frequency of copula forms produced across four levels of Spanish language study revealed an increase in ser and estar use and a decrease in developmental omission as learner level increased. Predicate type, resultant state, and Spanish grammar score significantly influenced use of estar over ser. Comparison with native English-speaking learners revealed differences between first language groups in terms of rates of form use, but similar developmental trends and predictors of estar use overall.

Type
Research Article
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 44 , Issue 1 , March 2022 , pp. 228 - 254
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I would like to thank Fernando Moros for his assistance in recruiting participants for the present study, Kimberly Geeslin for her encouragement and support throughout the writing process, Megan Solon for revising the first version of this manuscript and helping me prepare it for review, and the helpful comments and suggestions of the reviewers who helped me strengthen my delivery of this work. All remaining errors are my own.

References

Adamson, H. D., & Regan, V. M. (1991). The acquisition of community speech norms by Asian immigrants learning English as a second language: A preliminary study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amaro, J. C., Flynn, S., & Rothman, J. (Eds.). (2012). Third language acquisition in adulthood. John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Andersen, R. W. (1984). The one-to-one principle of interlanguage construction. Language Learning, 34, 77–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bardel, C., & Lindqvist, C. (2007). The role of proficiency and psychotypology in lexical cross-linguistic influence. A study of a multilingual learner of Italian L3. In Chini, M., Desideri, P., Favilla, M. E., & Pallotti, G. (Eds.), Atti del VI Congresso di Studi dell’Associazione Italiana di Linguistica Applicata (pp. 459–484). Guerra Editore.Google Scholar
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayley, R. (2013). The quantitative paradigm. In Chambers, J. K. & Schilling, N. (Eds.), The handbook of language variation and change (2nd ed., pp. 85–107). Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bayley, R., & Langman, J. (2004). Variation in the group and the individual: Evidence from second language acquisition. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 42, 303–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayley, R., & Preston, D. R. (Eds.). (1996). Second language acquisition and linguistic variation. John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayley, R., & Regan, V. (2004). Introduction: The acquisition of sociolinguistic competence. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 8, 323–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briscoe, G. (1995). The acquisition of ser and estar by non-native speakers of Spanish (Doctoral dissertation). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, I, 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, A. C., Lu, H. C., & Giannakouros, P. (2008). The uses of Spanish copulas by Chinese-speaking learners in a free writing task. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11, 301–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corder, S. P. (1967). The significance of learner’s errors. IRAL-International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 5, 161–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cortés-Torres, M. (2004). ¿Ser o estar? La variación lingüística y social de estar más adjetivo en el español de Cuernavaca, Mexico. Hispania, 87, 788–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croft, W. (2000). Parts of speech as language universals and as language-particular categories. In Vogel, P. M. & Comrie, B. (Eds.), Empirical approaches to language typology (pp. 65–102). Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
dePaola, T. (1978). Pancakes for breakfast. HMH Books.Google Scholar
Díaz-Campos, M., & Geeslin, K. L. (2011). Copula use in the Spanish of Venezuela: Is the pattern indicative of stable variation or an ongoing change? Spanish in Context, 8, 73–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. (1985). A variable competence model of second language acquisition. IRAL-International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 23, 47–59.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (1999). Item versus system learning: Explaining free variation. Applied Linguistics, 20, 460–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. (2004). Individual differences in second language learning. In Davies, A. & Elders, C. (Eds.), The handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 525–551). Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foote, R. (2009). Transfer in L3 acquisition: The role of typology. In Y.-k. I. Leung (Ed.), Third language acquisition and universal grammar (pp. 89–114). Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geeslin, K. (2000). A new approach to the second language acquisition of copula choice in Spanish. In Leow, R. & Sanz, C. (Eds.), Spanish applied linguistics at the turn of the millennium: Papers from the 1999 Conference on the L1 & L2 Acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese (pp. 50–66). Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Geeslin, K. (2011). The acquisition of variation in second language Spanish: How to identify and catch a moving target. In Díaz-Campos, M. (Ed.), The handbook of Hispanic sociolinguistics (pp. 303–319). Wiley Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geeslin, K., & Guijarro-Fuentes, P. (2005). The acquisition of copula choice in instructed Spanish: The role of individual characteristics. In Eddington, D. (Ed.), Studies in the acquisition of the Hispanic languages: Papers from the 6th Conference on the Acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese as First and Second Languages (pp. 66–77). Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Geeslin, K., Linford, B., Fafulas, S., Long, A., & Díaz-Campos, M. (2013). The L2 development of subject form variation in Spanish: The individual vs. the group. In Amaro, J. C., Lord, G., de Prada Pérez, A., & Aaron, J. E. (Eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 16th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 156–174). Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Geeslin, K. L. (2003). A comparison of copula choice: Native Spanish speakers and advanced learners. Language Learning, 53, 703–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geeslin, K. L. (2014). The acquisition of the copula contrast in second language Spanish. In Geeslin, K. L. (Ed.), The handbook of Spanish second language acquisition (pp. 219–234). Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Geeslin, K. L., & Gudmestad, A. (2008). Comparing interview and written elicitation tasks in native and non-native data: Do speakers do what we think they do. In Garavito, J. Bruhn de & Valenzuela, E. (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 10th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 64–77). Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Geeslin, K. L., & Guijarro-Fuentes, P. (2006). Second language acquisition of variable structures in Spanish by Portuguese speakers. Language Learning, 56, 53–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geeslin, K. L., & Guijarro-Fuentes, P. (2008). Variation in contemporary Spanish: Linguistic predictors of estar in four cases of language contact. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11, 365–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geeslin, K. L., & Long, A. Y. (2014). Sociolinguistics and second language acquisition: Learning to use language in context. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geeslin, K. L., & Long, A. Y. (2015). The development and use of the Spanish copula with adjectives by Korean-speaking learners. In Pérez-Jiménez, I., Leonetti, M., & Gumiel-Molina, S. (Eds.), New perspectives on the study of ser and estar (pp. 293–323). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Gudmestad, A. (2014). Variationist approaches to second language Spanish. In Geeslin, K. L. (Ed.), The handbook of Spanish second language acquisition (pp. 80–95). Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Guijarro-Fuentes, P., & Geeslin, K. (2006). Interpretation of Spanish copula choice by Portuguese near-native speakers. In Abello-Contesse, C., Chacón-Beltrán, R., López-Jiménez, M. D., & Torreblanca-López, M. M. (Eds.), Age in L2 acquisition and teaching (pp. 193–209). Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Guntermann, G. (1992). An analysis of interlanguage development over time: Part II, ser and estar. Hispania, 75, 1294–1303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutiérrez, M. J. (1994). Ser y estar en el habla de Michoacán, México. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar
Hammarberg, B. (2001). Roles of L1 and L2 in L3 production and acquisition. In Cenoz, J., Hufeisen, B., & Jessner, U. (Eds.), Cross-linguistic influence in third language acquisition (pp. 21–41). Multilingual Matters Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IBM Knowledge Center. (n.d.). Generalized linear mixed models. https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLVMB_23.0.0/components/glmm/idh_glmm.htmlGoogle Scholar
Kanwit, M., & Geeslin, K. L. (2020). Sociolinguistic competence and interpreting variable structures in a second language a study of the copula contrast in native and second- language Spanish. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 42, 775–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Lavandera, B. R. (1978). Where does the sociolinguistic variable stop? Language in Society, 7, 171–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, C. N., & Thompson, S. A. (1981). Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Long, A. (2021). The role of individual characteristics in the acquisition of Spanish copula choice: The case of Korean learners. In Menke, M. & Malovrh, P. (Eds.), Advancedness in second language Spanish: Definitions, challenges and possibilities (pp. 418–439). John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Max Planck Institute. (n.d.). The Leipzig Glossing Rules: Conventions for interlinear morpheme-by-morpheme glosses [PDF file]. https://www.eva.mpg.de/lingua/pdf/Glossing-Rules.pdfGoogle Scholar
MTELP Series by CaMLA. (2014). Michigan test of English language proficiency [Web document]. http://www.cambridgemichigan.org/institutions/products-services/tests/placement-progress/mtelp-series/Google Scholar
National Institute of Korean Language. (n.d.). Romanization of Korean. https://www.korean.go.kr/front_eng/roman/roman_01.doGoogle Scholar
Ortíz-López, L. (2000). La extensión de estar en contextos de ser en el español de Puerto Rico: ¿Evolución interna o contacto de lenguas? Boletín de la Academia Puertorriquena de la Lengua Española, 98–118.Google Scholar
Perpiñán, S., Marín, R., & Moreno Villamar, I. (2020). The role of aspect in the acquisition of ser and estar in locative contexts by English-speaking learners of Spanish. Language Acquisition, 27, 35–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfenninger, S. E., & Singleton, D. (2016). Age of onset, socio-affect and cross-linguistic influence: A long-term classroom study. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13, 147–179.Google Scholar
Preston, D. R. (2004). Three kinds of sociolinguistics: A psycholinguistic perspective. In Fought, C. (Ed.), Sociolinguistic variation: Critical reflections (pp. 140–158). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
R Core Team (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available from https://www.R-project.org/.Google Scholar
Ramírez-Gelpi, A. (1995). The acquisition of ser and estar among adult native English speakers learning Spanish as a second language (Doctoral dissertation). University of Southern California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Rast, R. (2010). The use of prior linguistic knowledge in the early stages of L3 acquisition. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 48, 159–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothman, J. (2011). L3 syntactic transfer selectivity and typological determinacy: The typological primacy model. Second Language Research, 27, 107–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothman, J., & Cabrelli Amaro, J. (2010). What variables condition syntactic transfer? A look at the L3 initial state. Second Language Research, 26, 189–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothman, J., González Alonso, J., & Miller, D. (2018). The acquisition of second language Spanish morphosyntax. In Geeslin, K. L. (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Spanish Linguistics (pp. 689–715). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, J. M., & Lafford, B. A. (1992). Acquisition of lexical meaning in a study abroad environment: Ser and estar and the Granada experience. Hispania, 75, 714–722.Google Scholar
Salazar, M. (2007). Está muy diferente a como era antes: “ser” and “estar”+ adjective in New Mexico Spanish. In Potowski, K. & Cameron, R. (Eds.), Spanish in contact: Policy, social and linguistic inquiries (pp. 343–353). John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, C. (1986). Bilingualism and language change: The extension of estar in Los Angeles Spanish. Language, 62, 587–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sohn, H.-M. (2001). The Korean language. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
VanPatten, B. (1985). The acquisition of ser and estar in adult second language learners: A preliminary investigation of transitional stages of competence. Hispania, 68, 399–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VanPatten, B. (1987). The acquisition of ser and estar: Accounting for developmental patterns. In VanPatten, B., Dvorak, T., & Lee, J. (Eds.), Foreign language learning: A research perspective (pp. 61–75). Newbury House.Google Scholar
VanPatten, B. (2010). Some verbs are more perfect than others: Why learners have difficulty with ser and estar and what it means for instruction. Hispania, 93, 29–38.Google Scholar
Williams, S., & Hammarberg, B. (1998). Language switches in L3 production: Implications for a polyglot speaking model. Applied Linguistics, 19, 295–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar