Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T15:26:20.894Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

English Reference Grammar for Polish Learners

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2008

Tomasz P. Krzeszowski
Tomasz P. Krzeszowski
Affiliation:
University of Lodz
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

English Reference Grammar for Polish Students or shortly Polish English Grammar (PEG) is a pedagogical contrastive grammar. It is written on contrastive principles and is based on the results of investigations conducted by a team of Polish linguists within the Polish-English Contrastive Project, sponsored by Center for Applied Linguistics at Arlington, Virginia and the Polish Ministry of Science, Technology and Higher Education. The Project is managed by Professor Jacek Fisiak, Director of the Institute of English Studies at Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan. Two volumes of the studies have already been published and two more are in preparation. (Fisiak 1973, 1974). The studies are conducted in the theoretical framework of generative transformational grammar, covering the most recent developments of the theory, without priority given to any specific version of the theory. Case grammar, generative semantics, extended standard theory, natural phonology, natural generative grammar and even language-in-the-context versions are all considered in the studies. Being basically theoretically oriented, the Project is not directly applicable in pedagogical practice, although a considerable amount of work is also being done along the didactic lines.

Type
Research Article
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , Fall 1978 , pp. 85 - 94
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Campbell, R. and Wales, R. 1970. “The study of language acquisition,” in Lyons 1970.Google Scholar
Cherry, Colin. 1957. On Human Communication, Cambridge, Massachusetts, The M.I.T. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corder, Pit. 1974. “Pedagogical grammars or the pedagogy of grammar?” in Corder and Roulet 1974.Google Scholar
Corder, Pit and Roulet, Eddy (eds.) 1973. Theoretical Linguistic Models in Applied Linguistics, Brussels, AIMAV, Paris, Didier.Google Scholar
Corder, Pit and Roulet, Eddy (eds.) 1974. Linguistic Insights in Applied Linguistics, Brussels, AIMAV, Paris, Didier.Google Scholar
Fisiak, Jacek (ed.) 1973, 1974. Papers and Studies in Contrastive Linguistics, Poznan, Adam Mickiewicz University, Washington, D.C., Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Gordon, D. and Lakoff, G. 1971. “Conversational postulates,” in Papers from the 7th Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society, 63–84.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. 1968. “The logic of conversation,” MS, Berkeley, California.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J. and Hymes, D. (eds) 1970. Directions in Sociolinguistics, New York, Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. 1970. “On communicative competence,” in Gumperz and Hymes.Google Scholar
Lakoff, Robin. (1972). “Language in context,” Language 48, 907–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widdowson, Henry. 1973. “Directions in the teaching of discourse,” in Corder and Roulet 1973, 65–76.Google Scholar
Wilkins, D. A. 1972. “An investigation into the linguistic and situational context of the common core in a unit/credit system,” Strasbourg, Council of Europe.Google Scholar