Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-03T08:12:09.546Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Grammatical Knowledge and Memorized Chunks: A Response to Ellis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2008

Georgette Ioup
Georgette Ioup
Affiliation:
University of New Orleans
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Responses
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 18 , Issue 3 , September 1996 , pp. 355 - 360
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bailey, N., Madden, C., & Krashen, S. (1974). Is there a “natural sequence” in adult second language learning? Language Learning, 24, 235–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, C. (1995). English syntax, 2nd ed.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Brown, G., & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R. (1973). A first language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Carroll, S. (1995). The hidden dangers of computer modelling: Remarks on Sokolik and Smith's connectionist learning model of French gender. Second Language Research, 11, 193–205.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H., & Muysken, P. (1986). The accessibility of Universal Grammar to adult and child learners: A study of the acquisition of German word order. Second Language Research, 2, 93–119.Google Scholar
Dulay, H., & Burt, M. (1974). Natural sequences in child second language acquisition. Language Learning, 24, 37–53.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. (1996). Sequencing in SLA: Phonological memory, chunking, and points of order. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 91–126.Google Scholar
Felix, S. (1978). Some differences between first and second language acquisition. In Waterson, N. & Snow, C. (Eds.), The development of communication (pp. 469–479). New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Felix, S. (1986). Cognition and language growth. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Pinker, S., & Prince, A. (1988). On language and connectionism: Analysis of a parallel distributed processing model of language acquisition. Cognition, 28, 73–193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rumelhart, D., & McClelland, J. (1987). Learning the past tense of English verbs: Implicit rules or parallel distributed processing. In MacWhinney, B. (Ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition (pp. 195–248). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Scarcella, R. (1979). Watch up: A study of verbal routines in adult second language performance. Working Papers on Bilingualism, 19, 79–88.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. (1983). Interaction, acculturation, and the acquisition of communicative competence: A case study of an adult. In Wolfson, N. & Judd, E. (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and language acquisition (pp. 137–174). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Sokolik, M., & Smith, M. (1992). Assignment of gender to French nouns in primary and secondary language: A connectionist model. Second Language Research, 8, 39–58.Google Scholar
Speidel, G. (1993). Phonological short-term memory and individual differences in learning to speak: A bilingual case study. First Language, 13, 69–91.Google Scholar
Yorio, C. (1989). Idiomaticity as an indicator of second language proficiency. In Hyltenstam, K. & Obler, L. (Eds.), Bilingualism across the lifespan (pp. 55–72). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar