Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T05:17:43.211Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

INVOLVEMENT LOAD HYPOTHESIS PLUS: CREATING AN IMPROVED PREDICTIVE MODEL OF INCIDENTAL VOCABULARY LEARNING – ERRATUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 August 2022

Akifumi Yanagisawa  and
Stuart Webb
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Type
Erratum
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 44 , Issue 5 , December 2022 , pp. 1502
Check for updates
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

In the original publication of this article (Yanagisawa & Webb, Reference Yanagisawa and Webb2021), the presentation of the second incidental vocabulary learning (IVL) formula, the incidental vocabulary learning formula of activities for retention, contained an incorrect number. The number “15.3” in the second-to-last line of the formula should be “11.5.” The full correct formula appears below:

$$ {\displaystyle \begin{array}{l} The\hskip0.5em incidental\hskip0.5em vocabulary\hskip0.5em learning\hskip0.5em for mula\hskip0.5em of\hskip0.5em activities\hskip0.5em for\hskip0.5em retention\\ {}\begin{array}{ll}& =\hskip0.5em \left[ Need\hskip0.5em \left( absent\hskip0.5em :\hskip0.5em 0\hskip0.5em or\hskip0.5em present\hskip0.5em :\hskip0.5em 1\right)\hskip0.5em \times \hskip0.5em 13.8\right]\\ {}& \hskip1.5em +\hskip0.5em \left[ Search\hskip0.5em \left(0\hskip0.5em or\hskip0.5em 1\right)\hskip0.5em \times \hskip0.5em -5.1\right]\\ {}& \hskip1.5em +\hskip0.5em \left[ Evaluation\hskip0.5em \left(0\hskip0.5em or\hskip0.5em 1\right)\hskip0.5em \times \hskip0.5em 9.1\right]\\ {}& \hskip1.5em +\hskip0.5em \left[ Sentence\hbox{-} level\hskip0.5em varied\hskip0.5em use\hskip0.5em \left(0\hskip0.5em or\hskip0.5em 1\right)\hskip0.5em \times \hskip0.5em 11.5\right]\\ {}& \hskip1.5em +\hskip0.5em \left[ Composition\hbox{-} level\hskip0.5em varied\hskip0.5em use\hskip0.5em \left(0\hskip0.5em or\hskip0.5em 1\right)\hskip0.5em \times \hskip0.5em 21.0\right]\end{array}\end{array}} $$

The original article has been updated. The publisher apologizes for this error.

References

REFERENCE

Yanagisawa, A., & Webb, S. (2021). Involvement Load Hypothesis Plus: Creating an improved predictive model of incidental vocabulary learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263121000577CrossRefGoogle Scholar