Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-l4ctd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-15T09:15:14.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Note on Religio Medici and some of its Critics*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2019

Joan Bennett*
Affiliation:
Girton College, Cambridge
Get access

Extract

Sir Thomas Browne has puzzled his critics. His high rank as one of the great writers of English prose is well established, but he has been read in different and sometimes incompatible ways. Professor Basil Willey, in his illuminating chapters on Browne in The Seventeenth Century Background, reminds us that “It is a romantic falsification to ‘relish’ Browne for his ‘quaintness’”. This was the nineteenth-century tendency from the time when Lamb, Hazlitt, and Coleridge rediscovered him to the essays of Walter Pater (Macmillan's liv, 1886; Appreciations, 1889) and Sir Leslie Stephen (Hours in a Library, Second Series, 1876) at the close of the period. Pater uses the word quaint and also humourist, although he circumscribes each with definitions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Renaissance Society of America 1956

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Read at the Newberry Library Conference on Renaissance Studies 16 April 1955.

References

* Read at the Newberry Library Conference on Renaissance Studies 16 April 1955.