Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-thh2z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-06T19:59:15.352Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Backgrounds and the Big Bang: Some Extracts from Their History

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 May 2016

Virginia Trimble
Virginia Trimble*
Affiliation:
Astronomy Department, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742 Department of Physics, University of California, Irvine CA 92717, USA

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The first astronomical background firmly established was that of cosmic rays. Photons at various wavelengths came later; and in some bands we have not year clearly peeled away all the sources to see a true background, if one even exists. All known backgrounds are astrophysically important and at least several cosmologically so. The path by which the standard hot big bang came to be generally regarded as standard is littered with the detritus of mistaken impressions, misunderstandings, and missed opportunities.

Type
Part I: Invited Reviews
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 168: Examining the Big Bang and the Diffuse Background Radiations , 1996 , pp. 9 - 16
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1996 

References

Alpher, R.A., Bethe, H. & Gamow, G. 1948. Phys. Rev. 73, 803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alpher, R.A. & Herman, R. 1948. Nature 162, 775 1949. Phys. Rev. 75, 1092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, J.R. et al. 1962. JGR 67, 4878.Google Scholar
Bothe, W. & Kohlhörster, W. 1929. Phys. Zeit. 30, 516.Google Scholar
Bowyer, S. 1991. ARA&A 29, 59.Google Scholar
Fazio, G.G. 1967. ARA&A, 481.Google Scholar
Hayakawa, S. et al. 1958. Prog. Theor. Phys. Sup. 6, 1.Google Scholar
Hayashi, C. 1950. Prog. Theor. Phys. Sup. 6, 1.Google Scholar
Henry, R.C. 1991. ARA&A 29, 89.Google Scholar
Herzberg, G. 1950. Spectra of Diatomic Molecules (Van Nostrand) p. 496.Google Scholar
Jansky, K. 1933. Nature 132, 66.Google Scholar
Kraushaar, W.L. & Clark, G.W. 1962. Phys. Rev. Lett. 8, 106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKellar, A. 1941. Publ. DAO 7, 251.Google Scholar
Ohm, E.A. 1961. Bell System Tech. J. 60, 1068 1994. Personal communication.Google Scholar
Penzias, A.A. & Wilson, R.E. 1965. ApJ 142, 420.Google Scholar
Reber, G. 1940. ApJ 91, 621; Proce. IRE 28, 681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seares, F.H., van Rhign, P.J., Joyner, Mary C. & Richmond, Myrtle L. 1925. ApJ 62, 320.Google Scholar
Taylor, J.H. et al. 1992. Nature 355, 125.Google Scholar
Yentis, D.K., Novick, R. & Vanden Bout, P. 1972. ApJ 177, 365 & 375.Google Scholar
Zeldovich, Ya. B. 1962. JETP 43, 1561 1963. Usphekii 6, 475.Google Scholar