Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-vt8vv Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-08-16T19:19:23.533Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cataclysmic Binaries: Optical and Geometrical Thickness of Disks and the Visibility of the Primary Components

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2017

Józef. I. Smak*
Affiliation:
N. Copernicus Astronomical Center Bartycka 18 00-716 Warsaw Poland

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Accretion disks in cataclysmic binaries are optically thick (in the vertical direction), except for the case of inner parts of cool disks in dwarf novae at quiescence, which are optically thin. In long period Algols disks are cool and optically thick; their atmospheres can be quite extensive.

Except for inclinations close to i = 0°, disks obscure either one or both hemispheres of the central star, the obscuration being either partial or total. In particular:

  1. (a) In stationary accretion cataclysmic binaries (old novae and nova-like systems), at inclinations close to 90° the white dwarf is fully obscured; at i < 85° only its top hemisphere becomes visible.

  2. (b) In dwarf novae at quiescence, at inclinations close to 90°, the obscuration of the white dwarf is either complete (for disk radii Rd ≥ 4 × 1010 cm), or limited to its equatorial parts (for Rd ≤ 2 × 1010 cm); at i ≈ 85 – 88° the top hemisphere becomes fully visible, while the bottom hemisphere is fully obscured; at i < 85°, due to the low optical thickness of the inner disk, parts of the bottom hemisphere near the equator also become visible.

  3. (c) In long period Algols the situations is similar as under (a); in addition, depending on inclination, part of the obscuration can be due to the atmosphere of the disk.

Type
Invited Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1992 

References

Canizzo, J.K., Wheeler, J.C. 1984 Ap.J. Suppl. , 55, 367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, F., Meyer-Hofmeister, E. 1984 Astron. Astrophys. , 132, 143.Google Scholar
Meyer-Hofmeister, E., Ritter, H. 1991 In: Close Binaries , Sahade, J., Kondo, Y., McCluskey, G. (eds.), Kluwer Academic Publ., in press.Google Scholar
Olson, E.C. 1987 Astron. J. , 94, 1309.Google Scholar
Smak, J. 1984 Acta Astron. , 34, 161.Google Scholar
Tylenda, R. 1988 Astron. Astrophys. , 197, 225.Google Scholar
Wood, J., Horne, K., Berriman, G., Wade, R., O'Donoghue, D., Warner, B. 1986 M.N.R.A.S. , 219, 629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, J., Horne, K., Berriman, G., Wade, R., 1989 Ap.J. , 341, 974.Google Scholar
Zola, S. 1991 Acta Astron. , 41, in press.Google Scholar