Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-xq9c7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-07T01:03:29.939Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Chemical Inhomogeneity within Globular Clusters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2016

John Norris*
Affiliation:
Mount Stromlo and Siding Spring Observatories Australian National University

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Twenty years ago it was believed by most astronomers that globular clusters were chemically homogeneous - where by homogeneous one means that the outer layers of all stars within a given cluster are the same to within a few tens of percent. Today it is possible to defend the case that no Galactic globular cluster has this characteristic. The reason that this phenomenon has exercised the minds of so many groups in the past 15 years is exciting and obvious: if one can ascertain which are the relevant physical processes in operation, one stands to gain significant insight into both the way in which globular clusters formed and/or the way in which individual low mass stars evolve and mix the products of their nucleosynthesis into their outer layers. A second important driver at the back of the minds of workers in this field is the possible ramifications of an understanding of the phenomenon; for example, if one concludes that the abundance anomalies are being driven today by some particular effect (angular momentum, magnetic fields, interactions within binary systems, stellar collisions - or whatever) this may lead to insight into other important globular cluster phenomena (eg bimodal horizontal branches, gaps at the base of the giant branch, horizontal branch rotation, etc.)

Type
Chapter II. Review Papers on Globular Clusters in the Milky Way
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1988 

References

REFERENCES

Bell, R. A. and Dickens, R. J. 1980 Astrophys. J. 242, 657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, R. A., Dickens, R. J. and Gustafsson, B. 1979 Astrophys. J. 229, 604.Google Scholar
Bell, R. A., Hesser, J. E. and Cannon, R. D. 1983 Astrophys. J. 269, 580.Google Scholar
Bessell, M. S. and Norris, J. 1976 Astrophys. J. 208, 369.Google Scholar
Cannon, R. D. and Stobie, R. S. 1973 Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 162, 207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carbon, D. F., Langer, G. E., Butler, D., Kraft, R. P., Suntzeff, N. B., Kemper, E., Trefzger, C. F., Romanshin, W. 1982 Astrophys. J. Suppl. 49, 207.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. G. 1981 Astrophys. J. 247, 869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. G. and Bell, R. A. 1986 Astrophys. J. 305, 698.Google Scholar
Cottrell, P. L. and Da Costa, G. S. 1981 Astrophys. J. Letters 245, L79.Google Scholar
Da Costa, G. S. and Demarque, P. 1982 Astrophys. J., 259, 193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Antona, F., Gratton, R. and Chieffi, A. 1983 Mem. Soc. Astron. Italiana 54, 173.Google Scholar
Deupree, R. G. and Cole, P. W. 1983a Astrophys. J. 269, 676.Google Scholar
Deupree, R. G. and Cole, P. W. 1983b Private Communication.Google Scholar
Dickens, R. J. and Bell, R. A. 1976 Astrophys. J. 207, 506.Google Scholar
Dickens, R. J., Bell, R. A. and Gustafsson, B. 1979 Astrophys. J. 232, 428.Google Scholar
Faulkner, J. and Iben, I. Jr. 1967 Nature 215, 44.Google Scholar
Freeman, K. C. and Norris, J. 1981 Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 19, 319.Google Scholar
Freeman, K. C. and Rodgers, A. W. 1975 Astrophys. J. Letters 201, L71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gratton, R. G. 1982 Astron. Astrophys. 115, 336.Google Scholar
Harding, G. A. 1962 Observatory 82, 205.Google Scholar
Iben, I. Jr. 1967 Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 5, 571.Google Scholar
Iben, I. Jr. 1974 Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 12, 215.Google Scholar
Iben, I. Jr. 1975 Astrophys. J. 196, 525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iben, I. Jr. 1976 Astrophys. J. 208, 165.Google Scholar
Kraft, R. P. 1979 Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 17, 309.Google Scholar
Langer, G. E. 1985 Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacific 97, 382.Google Scholar
Langer, G. E., Kraft, R. P., Carbon, D. F., Friel, E. and Oke, J. B. 1986 Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacific 98, 473.Google Scholar
Leep, E. M., Wallerstein, G. and Oke, J. B. 1986 Astron. J. 91, 1117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd Evans, T. 1977a Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 178, 345.Google Scholar
Lloyd Evans, T. 1977b Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 181, 591.Google Scholar
McClure, R. D. 1979 Mem. Soc. Astron. Italiana 50, 15.Google Scholar
Norris, J. 1987 Astrophys. J. Letters in press.Google Scholar
Norris, J. and Bessell, M. S. 1975 Astrophys. J. Letters 201, L75.Google Scholar
Norris, J. and Bessell, M. S. 1977 Astrophys. J. Letters 211, L91.Google Scholar
Norris, J., Cottrell, P. L., Freeman, K. C. and Da Costa, G. S. 1981 Astrophys. J. 244, 205.Google Scholar
Norris, J. and Freeman, K. C. 1983 Astrophys. J. 266, 130.Google Scholar
Norris, J., Freeman, K. C. and Da Costa, G. S. 1981 Astrophys. J. 244, 205.Google Scholar
Norris, J. and Pilachowski, C. A. 1985 Astrophys. J. 299, 295.Google Scholar
Norris, J. and Smith, G. H. 1983 Astrophys. J. 272, 635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, J. and Smith, G. H. 1984 Astrophys. J. 287, 255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborn, W. 1971 Observatory 91, 223.Google Scholar
Paltoglou, G. and Norris, J. 1987 in preparation.Google Scholar
Persson, S. E., Frogel, J. A., Cohen, J. G., Aaronson, M. and Matthews, K. 1980 Astrophys J. 235, 452.Google Scholar
Peterson, R. C. 1980 Astrophys J., Letters 237, L87.Google Scholar
Pilachowski, C. A., Wallerstein, G. and Leep, E. M. 1980 Astrophys. J. 236, 508.Google Scholar
Smith, G. H. 1985 Astrophys. J. 298, 249.Google Scholar
Smith, G. H. and Bell, R. A. 1986 Astron. J. 91, 1121.Google Scholar
Smith, G. H. and Norris, J. 1981a Astrophys. J. 254, 149.Google Scholar
Smith, G. H. and Norris, J. 1981b Astrophys. J. 254, 594.Google Scholar
Suntzeff, N. B. 1981 Astrophys. J. Suppl. 47, 1.Google Scholar
Sweigart, A. V. and Mengel, J. G. 1979 Astrophys. J. 229, 624.Google Scholar
Woolley, R. v. d. R. 1966 Roy. Obs. Ann., No. 2.Google Scholar
Zinn, R. 1973 Astrophys. J. 182, 183.Google Scholar