Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vpsfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T19:33:26.478Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A critical comparison of spectroscopic and evolutionary masses for O-type binary systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2016

Laura R. Penny
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, College of Charleston, Charleston, SC 29424, USA
Douglas R. Gies
Affiliation:
Center for High Angular Resolution Astronomy, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA
William G. Bagnuolo
Affiliation:
Center for High Angular Resolution Astronomy, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA
John H. Wise
Affiliation:
Center for High Angular Resolution Astronomy, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA
Artemio Herrero
Affiliation:
Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias, C/ Vía Láctea s/n, E-38200 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain
David J. Stickland
Affiliation:
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Chilton, Didcot, Oxon OX11 0QX, UK
Chris Lloyd
Affiliation:
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Chilton, Didcot, Oxon OX11 0QX, UK

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We have embarked on a program to directly compare spectroscopic and evolutionary masses with those obtained from a combination of spectroscopic and photometric orbital solutions for O-type binary systems. The ability to directly determine the spectroscopic masses of the individual components of O-type binary systems has been difficult, because of the severe line blending that is present in these systems. Doppler tomography is an iterative scheme, that uses an ensemble of spectra to reconstruct the individual component spectra. These individual spectra can then be analyzed.

Type
Part 1. Atmospheres of Massive Stars
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of the Pacific 2003 

References

Bagnuolo, W.G., Gies, D.R., Hahula, M.E., et al. 1994, ApJ 423, 446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrero, A., Puls, J., Najarro, P. 2002, A&A 396, 949.Google Scholar
Lloyd, C., Stickland, D.J. 2001, A&A 370, 1026.Google Scholar
Mochnacki, S.W., Doughty, N.A. 1972, MNRAS 156, 51.Google Scholar
Penny, L.R. 1996, ApJ 463, 737.Google Scholar
Penny, L.R., Gies, D.R., Wise, J.H., Stickland, D.J., Lloyd, C. 2002, ApJ 575, 1050.Google Scholar
Schaller, G. Schaerer, D., Meynet, G., Maeder, A. 1992, A&AS 96, 269.Google Scholar
Stickland, D.J., Lloyd, C. 2001, The Observatory 121, 1.Google Scholar
Walborn, N.R., Fitzpatrick, E.L. 1990, PASP 102, 379.Google Scholar