Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-30T18:14:54.925Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The distribution of H II regions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2015

P. G. Mezger
P. G. Mezger*
Affiliation:
National Radio Astronomy Observatory∗, Green Bank, W. Va., U.S.A., and Max-Planck-Institut für Radioastronomie, Bonn, Germany

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The distribution of optically observed H II regions and OB stars with galactic longitude indicates that it is primarily determined by extinction by interstellar dust. Thus optical observations can, at the best, reveal the local structure in the vicinity of the sun. Radio observations, on the other hand, are not affected by dust. Thus the distribution of galactic radio sources, which peaks in the northern part at about lII = 17°.5, must be related to the large-scale structure of our Galaxy. Two radio recombination line surveys of the northern and southern sky yield kinematic distances. If only the ‘giant H II regions’ are retained, the following distribution is obtained: (1) Only 5 giant H II regions are found within the 4 kpc arm. (2) The bulk of the giant H II regions is concentrated in a ring between 4 and 6 kpc from the galactic center. (3) There are other concentrations of giant H II regions indicating the existence of the Sagittarius and Perseus arm. (4) The three features revealed by optical observations of H II regions in the vicinity of the sun cannot be matched with the large-scale distribution outlined by giant H II regions. This is particularly true for the so-called Orion arm. (5) At distances beyond 13 kpc from the galactic center virtually no giant H II regions are found. (6) The surface density of giant H II regions attains its maximum between 4 and 8 kpc; the surface density of neutral hydrogen (H I) attains its maximum between 11 and 15 kpc, but the actual space density of H I in the region 4 to 8 kpc may still be rather high.

Type
Part II/Observations of Spiral Structure in Our Galaxy
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 38: The Spiral Structure of our Galaxy , 1970 , pp. 107 - 121
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1970 

References

Altenhoff, W.: 1968, in Interstellar Ionized Hydrogen (ed. by Terzian, Y.), Benjamin, New York, p. 519.Google Scholar
Altenhoff, W., Mezger, P. G., Wendker, H., and Westerhout, G.: 1960, Veröff. Univ. Sternwarte Bonn 59, 48.Google Scholar
Altenhoff, W., Downes, D., Goad, L., Maxwell, A., and Rinehart, R.: 1969, in press.Google Scholar
Blaauw, A.: 1964, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 2, 213.Google Scholar
Churchwell, E. and Felli, M.: 1969, several papers, in preparation.Google Scholar
Clark, B. G.: 1965, Astrophys. J. 142, 1398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Courtès, G., Georgelin, Y., Monnet, G., and Pourcelot, A.: 1968, in Interstellar Ionized Hydrogen (ed. by Terzian, Y.), Benjamin, New York, p. 571.Google Scholar
CSIRO: 1969, in preparation.Google Scholar
Dieter, N. H.: 1967, Astrophys. J. 150, 435.Google Scholar
Felli, M. and Churchwell, E.: 1969, in preparation.Google Scholar
Goss, W. M. and Shaver, P. A.: 1969, in preparation.Google Scholar
Hill, E. R.: 1968, Australian. J. Phys. 21, 735.Google Scholar
Hodge, P. W.: 1969a, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 18, 73.Google Scholar
Hodge, P. W.: 1969b, Astrophys. J. 155, 417.Google Scholar
Höglund, B. and Mezger, P. G.: 1965, Science 150, 339.Google Scholar
Kerr, F. J., Burke, B. F., Reifenstein, E. C., Wilson, T. L., and Mezger, P. G.: 1968, Nature 220, 1210.Google Scholar
Lin, C. C. and Shu, F. H.: 1964, Astrophys. J. 140, 646.Google Scholar
Lin, C. C. and Shu, F. H.: 1966, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. Am. 55, 229.Google Scholar
Mathewson, D. S., Healey, J. R., and Rome, J. M.: 1962, Australian. J. Phys. 15, 354, 369.Google Scholar
McGee, R. X. and Gardner, F. F.: 1968, Australian. J. Phys. 21, 149.Google Scholar
Mebold, U.: 1969, Beiträge zur Radioastronomie 1, 97.Google Scholar
Mezger, P. G.: 1969, Colloque Internat. Liège No. 16, in press.Google Scholar
Mezger, P. G. and Henderson, A. P.: 1967, Astrophys. J. 147, 471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mezger, P. G. and Höglund, B.: 1967, Astrophys. J. 147, 490.Google Scholar
Mezger, P. G., Wilson, T. L., Gardner, F. F., and Milne, D. K.: 1970, Astron. Astrophys. 4, 96.Google Scholar
Oort, J. H.: 1965, Trans. IAU 12A, 789.Google Scholar
Reifenstein, E. C., Wilson, T. L., Burke, B. F., Mezger, P. G., and Altenhoff, W. J.: 1970, Astron. Astrophys. 4, 357.Google Scholar
Roberts, M. S.: 1968, in Interstellar Ionized Hydrogen (ed. by Terzian, Y.), Benjamin, New York, p. 617.Google Scholar
Schmidt, M.: 1965, Stars and Stellar Systems 5, 513.Google Scholar
Schraml, J. and Mezger, P. G.: 1969, Astrophys. J. 156, 269.Google Scholar
Sharpless, S.: 1959, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 4, 257.Google Scholar
Shaver, P. A. and Goss, W. M.: 1969, in preparation.Google Scholar
Sim, M. E.: 1968, The Royal Observatory, Edinburgh, Publ. 6, No. 5.Google Scholar
Westerhout, G.: 1958, Bull. Astron. Inst. Netherl. 14, 215.Google Scholar
Wilson, T. L., Mezger, P. G., Gardner, F. F., and Milne, D. K.: 1970, in preparation.Google Scholar