Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wtssw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-19T09:14:53.197Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

General Relativistic Theory of Rotating Neutron Stars – A Review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 February 2017

Jeffrey M. Cohen*
Affiliation:
Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, N.J., U.S.A.

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Except in cosmology, astrophysicists are used to thinking of general relativistic effects as small (e.g., light bending, perihelion advance, red shift) and have generally left such problems to general relativists. However, the discovery of pulsars (Hewish et al., 1968) may have changed this. Not only is general relativity necessary to treat rotating neutron stars, but relativity was also partly responsible for the elimination of pulsating white dwarfs as pulsar models.

Type
Session 6
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1971 

References

Anderson, J. L. and Cohen, J. M.: 1970, Astrophys. Space Sci. 9, 146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bardeen, J., Thorne, K. S., and Meltzer, D.: 1966, Astrophys. J. 145, 505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brill, D. R. and Cohen, J. M.: 1966, Phys. Rev. 143, 1011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, A. G. W.: 1970, this symposium, Paper 6.1, p. 323.Google Scholar
Canuto, V. and Chiu, H. Y.: 1968, Phys. Rev. 173, 1210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandrasekhar, S.: 1964, Astrophys. J. 140, 417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cocke, W. J.: 1965, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré, 2, No. 4, 283.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. M.: 1965, Summer Institute on Relativity Theory and Astrophysics (Cornell); notes appear in Lectures in Applied Math. 8: Relativity Theory and Astrophysics (ed. by Ehlers, J.), A.M.S., Providence, 1967.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. M.: 1967, J. Math. Phys. 8, 1477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. M.: 1968a, Phys. Rev. 173, 1258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. M.: 1968b, J. Math. Phys. 9, 905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. M.: 1968c, N. Y. Pulsar Conference, 20–21 May.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. M. and Brill, D. R.: 1968, Nuovo Cimento 56B, 209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. M. and Cameron, A. G. W.: 1969, Nature 224, No. 5219, 566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. M. and Cameron, A. G. W.: 1970, Astrophys. Space Sci. (in press).Google Scholar
Cohen, J. M., Langer, W., Rosen, L., and Cameron, A. G. W.: 1969a, Astrophys. Space Sci. 6, 228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. M., Lapidus, A., and Cameron, A. G. W.: 1969b, Astrophys. Space Sci. 5, 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. M. and Cohen, M. D.: 1969, Phys. Teacher 7, No. 4, 241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de la Cruz, V., Chase, J. E., and Israel, W.: 1970, Phys. Rev. Letters 24, 423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faulkner, J. and Gribbin, J.: 1968, Nature 217, 734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finzi, A. and Wolf, R. A.: 1969, Astrophys. J. Letters 155, L107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginzburg, V. L. and Ozernoi, L. M.: 1965, Soviet Phys. – JETP 20, 689.Google Scholar
Gold, T.: 1968, Nature 218, 731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldreich, P. and Julian, W. H.: 1969, Astrophys. J. 157, 869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunn, J. and Ostriker, J.: 1969, Nature 221, 454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartle, J. B.: 1970, to be published.Google Scholar
Hartle, J. B. and Thorne, K. S.: 1968, Astrophys. J. 153, 807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hewish, A., Bell, S. J., Pilkington, J. D. H., Scott, P. F., Collins, R. A.: 1968, Nature 217, 709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landau, L. and Lifshitz, E.: 1962, Classical Theory of Fields , Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass. Google Scholar
Michel, C.: 1969, Astrophys. J. 157, 1183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
M⊘ller, C.: 1962, Theory of Relativity , Oxford Press, New York.Google Scholar
Skilling, J.: 1968, Nature 218, 923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taub, A. H.: 1962, Colloq. Intern. Centre Nat. Rech. Sci. 91, 173.Google Scholar
Thorne, K. S.: 1970, to be published.Google Scholar
Wheeler, J. A.: 1966, Annual Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zel'dovich, Ya.: 1970, to be published.Google Scholar
Discussion of this paper was deferred until after the paper by Bonazzola (6.4).Google Scholar