Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wpx84 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-16T23:27:08.273Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Introduction to the session

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2015

Carl Heiles*
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Five years ago, at the previous IAU Symposium (No. 60) on the galaxy, most of us pictured the interstellar medium (ISM) as a mainly quiescent medium which evolved by orderly processes–the “steady state” ISM. Radhakrishnan reviewed the “intercloud medium” which was warm (some few thousand degrees), rarefied (some few tenths cm−3), uniformly - distributed, partly ionized, and responsible for the smoothly-distributed pulsar dispersion measures and Faraday rotations. Heiles reviewed the “clouds,” which had densities of tens cm−3, temperatures of tens K, and nonspherical shapes. These two components were in approximate pressure equilibrium; Grewing, in his review of heating mechanisms, emphasized pervasive, nonvarying processes.

Type
V. PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF THE INTERSTELLAR MEDIUM
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1979 

References

Tanaka, Y., and Bleeker, J. A. M.: 1977, Space Sci. Rev. 20, 815.Google Scholar
Jenkins, E. B.: 1978, Ap. J. 220, 107.Google Scholar
Jenkins, E. B., and Meloy, D. A.: 1974, Ap. J. 193, L21.Google Scholar
Cox, D. P., and Smith, B. W.: 1974, Ap. J. 189, L105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKee, C. F., and Ostriker, J. P.: 1977, Ap. J. 218, 148.Google Scholar
Smith, B. W.: 1977, Ap. J. 211, 404.Google Scholar