Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T14:18:58.211Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Large-Scale Flows in the Local Universe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 May 2016

D.S. Mathewson
Affiliation:
Mount Stromlo and Siding Spring Observatories, The Australian National University, ACT 2611, Australia
V.L. Ford
Affiliation:
Mount Stromlo and Siding Spring Observatories, The Australian National University, ACT 2611, Australia

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Peculiar velocity measurements of 2500 southern spiral galaxies show large-scale flows in the direction of the Hydra-Centaurus clusters which fully participate in the flow themselves. The flow is not uniform over this region and seems to be associated with the denser regions which participate in the flow of amplitude about 400km/s. In the less dense regions the flow is small or non-existent. This makes the flow quite asymmetric and inconsistent with that expected from large-scale, parallel streaming flow that includes all galaxies out to 6000km/s as previously thought. The flow cannot be modelled by a Great Attractor at 4300km/s or the Centaurus clusters at 3500km/s. Indeed, from the density maps derived from the redshift surveys of “optical” and IRAS galaxies, it is difficult to see how the mass concentrations can be responsible particularly as they themselves participate in the flow. These results bring into question the generally accepted reason for the peculiar velocities of galaxies that they arise solely as a consequence of infall into the dense regions of the universe. To the N. of the Great Attractor region, the flow increases and shows no sign of diminishing out to the redshift limit of 8000km/s in this direction. We may have detected flow in the nearest section of the Great Wall.

Type
Part I: Invited Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1996 

References

Bertschinger, E. and Dekel, A.: 1989, ApJ. 336, L5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bursteain, D. and Heiles, C.: 1978, ApJ. 225, 40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Courteau, S., Faber, S.M., Dressler, A. and Willick, J.A.: 1993, ApJ. 412, L51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dressler, A., Faber, S.M., Burstein, D., Davies, R.L., Lynden-Bell, D., Terlevich, RJ. and Wegner, F.: 1987, ApJ. 313, L37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Federspiel, M., Sandage, A. and Tammann, G.A.: 1994, ApJ. 430, 29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fixsen, D.J. et al: 1994, ApJ. 420, 439.Google Scholar
Geller, M.J. and Huchra, J.P.: 1989, Science. 246, 857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, M.J.: 1993, MNRAS. 265, 43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, M.J.: 1994, MNRAS. 266, 475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kogut, A. et al: 1993, ApJ. 419, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lauer, T.R. and Postman, M.: 1994, ApJ. 425, 418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynden-Bell, D., Faber, S.M., Burstein, D., Davies, R.L., Dressler, A., Terlevich, RJ. and Wegner, G.: 1988, ApJ. 326, 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathewson, D.S., Ford, V.L. and Buchhorn, M.: 1992a, ApJ. 389, L5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathewson, D.S., Ford, V.L. and Buchhorn, M.: 1992b, ApJS. 81, 413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathewson, D.S. and Ford, V.L.: 1994, ApJ (in press).Google Scholar
Nusser, A., Dekel, A., Bertschinger, E. and Blumenthal, G.R.: 1991, ApJ. 379, 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scaramella, R., Baiesi-Pillastrini, G., Chincarini, G., Vettolani, G. and Zamorani, G.: 1989, Nature. 338, 562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silk, J.: 1987, “Observational Cosmology”, IAU Symposium No. 124, p.391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willick, J.A.: 1990, ApJ. 351, L5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar