Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-l4ctd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-17T21:22:41.950Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Local Density and Morphology Dependence of the Galaxy Luminosity Function

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2017

Jacek Choloniewski
Affiliation:
Copernicus Astronomical Center, ul. Bartycka 18, 00–716 Warszawa, Poland
Miroslaw Panek
Affiliation:
Copernicus Astronomical Center, ul. Bartycka 18, 00–716 Warszawa, Poland NASA/Fermilab Astrophysics Group, Chicago, USA

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We obtained the luminosity function (LF) for samples of galaxies from the CfA North catalogue (Huchra, Davis, Latham and Tonry, 1983). the criteria of selection of samples were the local density (range—more than 2 orders of magnitude) and/or the morphology. No difference in the combined LF for all morphological types is found for subsamples of different density. the LF of elliptical galaxies is found to be less steep at the faint end than the LFs for S and SO galaxies. E galaxies are on the average brighter than the other morphological types. the LFs measured for early–type galaxies (E + S0) in high and low density regions show marginal difference—the low density LF has a steeper faint end slope. (Such a difference is not found for S galaxies). If this feature is maintained for larger samples it may indicate that the LF determined at the moment of galaxy formation is only weakly influenced by the phenomena present in dense regions. This is because these phenomena would rather leave the opposite imprint on the LF—the tidal stripping in dense regions would populate them with faint remnants of disrupted, bright, low angular momentum galaxies. Mergers could not reverse this trend because they act mainly on the bright galaxies.

Type
Posters
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1987 

References

REFERENCES

Choloniewski, J., Panek, M. 1985, Fermilab preprint 85/179—A Google Scholar
Huchra, J., Davis, M., Latham, D. W., and Tonry, J. 1983, Ap. J. Suppl., 52, 89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar