Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-rkxrd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T13:31:41.283Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Modeling the Infrared Magnesium and Hydrogen Lines from Quiet and Active Solar Regions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 August 2017

E. H. Avrett ,
E. S. Chang  and
R. Loeser
E. H. Avrett
Affiliation:
Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.
E. S. Chang
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, U.S.A.
R. Loeser
Affiliation:
Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The emission lines of Mg I at 7.4, 12.2, and 12.3 μm are now known to be formed in the upper photosphere; the line emission is due to collisional coupling of higher levels with the continuum together with radiative depopulation of lower levels. These combined effects cause the line source functions of high-lying transitions to exceed the corresponding Planck functions. However, there are uncertainties in a) the relevant atomic data, particularly the collisional rates and ultraviolet photoionization rates, and b) the sensitivity of the calculated results to changes in atmospheric temperature and density. These uncertainties are examined by comparing twelve calculated Mg I line profiles in the range 2.1-12.3 μm with ATMOS satellite observations. We show results based on different rates, and using different atmospheric models representing a range of dark and bright spatial features. The calculated Mg profiles are found to be relatively insensitive to atmospheric model changes, and to depend critically on the choice of collisional and photoionization rates. We find better agreement with the observations using collision rates from van Regemorter (1962) rather than from Seaton (1962). We also compare twelve calculated hydrogen profiles in the range 2.2-12.4 μm with ATMOS observations. The available rates and cross sections for hydrogen seem adequate to account for the observed profiles, while the calculated lines are highly sensitive to atmospheric model changes. These lines are perhaps the best available diagnostics of the temperature and density structure of the photosphere and low chromosphere. Further calculations based on these infrared hydrogen lines should lead to greatly improved models of the solar atmosphere.

Keywords

atomic processesinfrared: starsline: formationSun: atmosphere
Type
Part 4: Infrared Atomic Physics and Line Formation
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 154: Infrared Solar Physics , 1994 , pp. 323 - 339
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1994 

References

Anderson, L. S.: 1989, Astrophys. J. 339, 558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avrett, E. H.: 1985, in Lites, B. W. (ed.), Chromospheric Diagnostics and Modelling, National Solar Observatory, Sunspot, NM, p. 67.Google Scholar
Ayres, T. R., Testerman, L., and Brault, J. W.: 1986, Astrophys. J. 304, 542.Google Scholar
Boreiko, R. T., Clark, T. A., Naylor, D. A., and Busier, J.: 1993, these proceedings.Google Scholar
Brault, J. and Noyes, R.: 1983, Astrophys. J. 269, L61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlsson, M., and Rutten, R. J.: 1992, Astron. Astrophys. 259, L53.Google Scholar
Carlsson, M., and Rutten, R. J.: 1993, these proceedings.Google Scholar
Carlsson, M., Rutten, R. J., and Shchukina, N. G.: 1992a, Astron. Astrophys. 253, 567 (CRS).Google Scholar
Carlsson, M., Rutten, R. J., and Shchukina, N. G.: 1992b, in Giampapa, M. S. and Bookbinder, J. A. (eds.), Cool Stars, Stellar Systems, and the Sun, Seventh Cambridge Workshop, Astron. Soc. Pacific, San Francisco, p. 518.Google Scholar
Chang, E. S., Avrett, E. H., Mauas, P. J., Noyes, R. W., and Loeser, R.: 1991, Astrophys. J. 379, L79.Google Scholar
Chang, E. S., Avrett, E. H., Mauas, P. J., Noyes, R. W., and Loeser, R.: 1992, in Giampapa, M. S. and Bookbinder, J. A. (eds.), Cool Stars, Steller Systems, and the Sun, Seventh Cambridge Workshop, Astron. Soc. Pacific, San Francisco, p. 521.Google Scholar
Cram, L. E., and Damé, L.: 1983, Astrophys. J. 272, 355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farmer, C. B., and Norton, R. H.: 1989, A High-Resolution Atlas of the Infrared Spectrum of the Sun and the Earth Atmosphere from Space, NASA Ref. Pub. 1224, Vol. 1.Google Scholar
Fontenla, J. M., Avrett, E. H., and Loeser, R.: 1992, Astrophys. J., in press.Google Scholar
Hoang-Binh, D.: 1993, these proceedings.Google Scholar
Holweger, H., and Müller, E. A.: 1974, Solar Phys. 39, 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, L. C.: 1972, Astrophys. J. 174, 227.Google Scholar
Kaulakys, B.: 1985, J. Phys. B., 18, L167.Google Scholar
Kurucz, R. L.: 1991, in Crivellari, L., Hubeny, I., and Hummer, D. G. (eds.), Stellar Atmospheres: Beyond Classical Models, p. 441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maltby, P., Avrett, E. H., Carlsson, M., Kjeldseth-Moe, O., Kurucz, R. L., and Loeser, R.: 1986, Astrophys. J. 306, 284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauas, P. J., Avrett, E. J., and Loeser, R.: 1988, Astrophys. J. 330, 1008.Google Scholar
Moccia, R., and Spizzo, P.: 1988, J. Phys. B., 21, 1133.Google Scholar
Rutten, R. J., and Carlsson, M.: 1993, these proceedings.Google Scholar
Seaton, M. J.: 1962, Proc. Phys. Soc. London, 79, 1105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ueda, K., Karasawa, M., and Fukuda, K.: 1982, J. Phys. Soc. Japan, 51, 2267.Google Scholar
van Regemorter, H.: 1962, Astrophys. J. 136, 906.Google Scholar
Vernazza, J. E., Avrett, E. H., and Loeser, R.: 1976, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 30, 1.Google Scholar