Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g7rbq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T12:13:12.375Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Properties of Black Holes Relevant to their Observation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 February 2017

James M. Bardeen
James M. Bardeen*
Affiliation:
Yale University, U.S.A.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Black holes are very small objects by astronomical standards, so in many circumstances they interact with their surroundings like a Newtonian mass point. However, if black holes are present in X-ray binary systems, the X-rays emitted in the inner part of the accretion disk probe the highly curved spacetime geometry near the horizon, particularly if the black hole is rapidly rotating. Some of the properties of circular orbits near the black hole are quite sensitive to the amount of angular momentum. The relativistic corrections remove a Newtonian degeneracy between several of the characteristic frequencies associated with perturbations of the circular orbits.

Hot spots in the inner part of the disk can produce dramatic fluctuations in intensity, since the frequency shifts of photons emitted by a given point on the disk are strongly time-dependent. The bending of the photon trajectories by the strong gravitational field can drastically affect the energy balance of the disk; much of the radiation emitted by the inner part of the disk is reabsorbed. The dragging of inertial frames by the angular momentum of the black hole can have striking consequences for the structure of the disk at quite large radii if the angular momentum of the accreting matter is not in the same direction as the angular momentum of the black hole.

Dynamic perturbations of black holes are now being intensively studied to see if there are any surprising physical effects associated with the rotation of the black hole. Unfortunately, though quite interesting methods of extracting energy from the black hole exist in principle most of them are unlikely to be realized to an important extent in the real astrophysical world.

Type
Part II: Stability and Collapse
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 64: Gravitational Radiation and Gravitational Collapse , 1974 , pp. 132 - 144
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1974 

References

Bardeen, J. M.: 1970, Nature 226, 64.Google Scholar
Bardeen, J. M.: 1973, in DeWitt, C. and DeWitt, B. (eds.), Black Holes, Gordon and Breach, New York, London, Paris, p. 229.Google Scholar
Bardeen, J. M., Carter, B., and Hawking, S. W.: 1973, Commun. Math. Phys. 31, 161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bardeen, J. M., Press, W. H., and Teukolsky, S. A.: 1972, Astrophys. J. 178, 347.Google Scholar
Bardeen, J. M. and Wagoner, R. V.: 1971, Astrophys. J. 167, 359.Google Scholar
Carter, B.: 1968, Phys. Rev. 174, 1558.Google Scholar
Carter, B.: 1971, Phys. Rev. Letters 26, 331.Google Scholar
Cunningham, C. T. and Bardeen, J. M.: 1973, Astrophys. J. 183, 237.Google Scholar
Cunningham, C. T.: 1973, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Washington.Google Scholar
Hartle, J. B. and Hawking, S. W.: 1972, Commun. Math. Phys. 26, 87.Google Scholar
Hawking, S. W.: 1971, Phys. Rev. Letters 26, 1344.Google Scholar
Hawking, S. W. and Ellis, C. F. R.: 1973, The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Israel, W.: 1967, Phys. Rev. 164, 1776.Google Scholar
Kerr, R. P.: 1963, Phys. Rev. Letters 11, 238.Google Scholar
Lynden-Bell, D.: 1969, Nature 223, 690.Google Scholar
Lynden-Bell, D. and Rees, M. J.: 1971, Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 152, 461.Google Scholar
Mashoon, B.: 1972, Ph.D. Thesis, Princeton University.Google Scholar
Misner, C. W.: 1972, Phys. Rev. Letters 28, 994.Google Scholar
Newman, E. T., Couch, E., Chinnapared, R., Exton, A., Prakash, A., and Torrence, R.: 1965, J. Math. Phys. 6, 918.Google Scholar
Novikov, I. D. and Thorne, K. S.: 1973, in DeWitt, C. and DeWitt, B. (ed.), Black Holes, Gordon and Breach, New York, London, Paris.Google Scholar
Peebles, P. J. E.: 1972, Gen. Rel. Grav. 3, 63.Google Scholar
Press, W. H. and Teukolsky, S. A.: 1972, Nature 238, 211.Google Scholar
Press, W. H. and Teukolsky, S. A.: 1973, Astrophys J. 185, 649.Google Scholar
Pringle, J. E. and Rees, M. J.: 1972, Astron. Astrophys. 21, 1.Google Scholar
Ruffini, R. and Wheeler, J. A.: 1970, in Moore, A. F. and Hardy, V. (ed), The significance of Space Research for Fundamental Physics, European Space Research Organization, Paris.Google Scholar
Shakura, N. I. and Sunyaev, R. A.: 1973, Astron. Astrophys. 24, 337.Google Scholar
Shapiro, S. L.: 1973, Astrophys. J. 180, 531.Google Scholar
Shvartsman, V. F.: 1971, Soviet Astron. AJ 15, 277.Google Scholar
Starobinski, A. A. and Churilov, S. M.: 1973, Zh. Eksperim. Teor. Fiz. 65, 3.Google Scholar
Sunyaev, R. A.: 1972, Astron. Zh. 49, 1153.Google Scholar
Teukolsky, S. A.: 1972, Phys. Rev. Letters 29, 1114.Google Scholar
Teukolsky, S. A.: 1973, Ph.D. Thesis, California Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Thorne, K. S.: 1974, Astrophys. J., to be published.Google Scholar
Wheeler, J. A.: 1971, in Connell, D. J. K. O. (ed.), Nuclei of Galaxies, North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, London.Google Scholar
Wilkins, D. C.: 1972, Phys. Rev. D5, 814.Google Scholar
Zel'dovich, Ya. B. and Novikov, I. D.: 1971, Relativistic Astrophysics, Vol. I, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar