Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-pwrkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-11T10:13:51.005Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Status of Experiments for Direct Detection of Galactic Dark Matter Particles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2016

Peter F. Smith*
Affiliation:
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Chilton, Oxon, OX11 0QX, UK

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

There is increasing evidence that the majority of dark matter is non-baryonic. Principal candidates are weakly interacting massive particles (WIMPS), axions, and neutrinos. There has been increasing effort on sensitive WIMP searches, motivated in particular by supersymmetry theory, which predicts a stable neutral particle in the mass range 10-1000 GeV. Interactions of these with normal matter would produce low energy nuclear recoils which could be observed by underground detectors capable of discriminating these from background. Current experimental progress is summarised, together with plans for more sensitive experiments. These include gaseous detectors with directional sensitivity, offering the prospect of a ‘dark matter telescope’ which would provide information on the dark matter velocity distribution. Axions could be detected by conversion to microwave photons, and experimental sensitivity is approaching the theoretically-required levels. Relic neutrinos could also form a component of the dark matter if any has a cosmologically significant mass, and the latter could be checked with a new detector able to detect the higher neutrino flavours from a Galactic supernova burst. More distant future possibilities are outlined for direct detection of relic neutrinos by coherent scattering.

Type
Part VIII: Dark Matter and Ω0
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of the Pacific 2005 

References

Abusaidi, R. et al. 2000, Phys.Rev. Letters 84 5699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belli, P. et al. 2000, Proc. Conf. Sources of Dark Matter (Cline, D., ed., Marina del Rey, to be published.Google Scholar
Benetti, P. et al. 1993 Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 327 203.Google Scholar
Bernabei, R. et al. 1996, Phys. Lett. B 389 757.Google Scholar
Bernabei, R. et al. 1998, Phys. Lett. B424 195.Google Scholar
Birkinshaw, M. 2000, these proceedings.Google Scholar
Booth, N. E., Cabrera, B. & Fiorini, E. 1996, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci, 46 471.Google Scholar
Bravin, M. et al. 1999, Astropart. Phys. 12 107.Google Scholar
Cline, D. et al. 2000, Astropart. Phys. 12 373.Google Scholar
Doll, P. et al. 1989, Nucl. Instrum. Methods A285 46.Google Scholar
Fuller, G. M., Haxton, W. C. & McLaughlin, G. C. 1999 Phys.Rev. D59 085005.Google Scholar
Lasserre, T. et al. 2000, Astron. Astrophys. 355 L39.Google Scholar
Martoff, C. J et al. 2000, Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 440 355.Google Scholar
Primak, J. R., Seckel, D. Sadoulet, B. 1988 Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 38 751.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, L. J. & Van Bibber, K. A. 2000 Physics Reports 325 1.Google Scholar
Sikivie, P. 1983 Phys. Rev. Letters 51 1415.Google Scholar
Smith, N. J. T., Lewin, J. D. & Smith, P. F. 2000 Phys.Lett. B 485 9.Google Scholar
Smith, P. F. 1990 Proc. Texas/ESO-CERN Symposium 4 (Brighton) 425.Google Scholar
Smith, P. F. 1991 Texas/ESO-CERN conference, Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 647 425 4.Google Scholar
Smith, P. F. 1997 Astropart. Phys. 8 27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, P. F. & Lewin, J. D. 1983, Phys. Lett. B 127 185.Google Scholar
Smith, P. F. & Lewin, J. D. 1990 Physics Reports 187 203.Google Scholar
Smith, P. F. et al. 1996, Phys. Lett. B 379 299.Google Scholar
Smith, P. F. et al. 1998, Physics Reports 307 275.Google Scholar