Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-x5cpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T19:24:31.904Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Two Interpretations of ‘Gloriana’ as Music Drama: A re-affirmation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2010

Extract

The younger one gets—the more, that is, one sheds those inevitable, almost instinctive prejudices with which one's civilization, especially if it happens to be an old one, has burdened one almost from birth—the more easily things go right for one when they go wrong for the civilization in general and for the critic in particular. Criticism tends to misfire in proportion as it is civilized, as it instinctively, pre-consciously judges the present in terms of the past: the law of precedent is the death of art—or, if art survives its application, the death of criticism. What is an opera? 1 don't know: it all depends on the next one, not the last one.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cooper, M.: “Opera Revival”, Daily Telegraph, 10 22 1966 Google Scholar
Klein, J. W.: “Some Reflections on Gloriana”, Tempo 29, Autumn 1953 Google Scholar
Mann, W. S.: “Characters of Britten Opera Captured,” The Times, 10 22 1966 Google Scholar
Mitchell, D.: “Public and Private Life in Britten's Gloriana”, Opera, 10 1966 Google Scholar
Plomer, W.: “Notes on the Libretto of Gloriana”, Tempo 28, Summer 1953 Google Scholar