Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T08:19:13.113Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Using consensus OPCRIT diagnoses

An efficient procedure for best-estimate lifetime diagnoses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 January 2018

M. H. Azevedo ,
M. J. Soares ,
I. Coelho ,
A. Dourado ,
J. Valente ,
A. Macedo ,
M. Pato  and
C. Pato
M. H. Azevedo*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine and Centre for Neuroscience, Coimbra University, Coimbra, Portugal
M. J. Soares
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine and Centre for Neuroscience, Coimbra University, Coimbra, Portugal
I. Coelho
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine and Centre for Neuroscience, Coimbra University, Coimbra, Portugal
A. Dourado
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine and Centre for Neuroscience, Coimbra University, Coimbra, Portugal
J. Valente
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine and Centre for Neuroscience, Coimbra University, Coimbra, Portugal
A. Macedo
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine and Centre for Neuroscience, Coimbra University, Coimbra, Portugal
M. Pato
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine and Centre for Neuroscience, Coimbra University, Coimbra, Portugal, and Department of Psychiatry, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA
C. Pato
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine and Centre for Neuroscience, Coimbra University, Coimbra, Portugal, and Department of Psychiatry, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA
*
Professor Maria Helena Azevedo, Psicologia Médica, Faculdade de Medecina, Universidade de Coimbra, Rua Larga, 3049 Coimbra Codex, Portugal. e-mail: helenamh@ci.uc.pt
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

The Operational Criteria Checklist (OPCRIT) generates diagnoses according to 12 operational diagnostic systems (e. g. DSM–III, DSM–III–R, Research Diagnostic Criteria, ICD–10)

Aims

To examine the agreement between diagnoses generated by the OPCRIT, as completed by the interviewer, with a best-estimate lifetime procedure using the OPCRIT.

Method

Subjects came from large mufti-generational bipolar or schizophrenia pedigrees (n=100), and from a sample of unrelated subjects with schizophrenia (n=40). We analysed the diagnostic agreement between OPCRIT diagnoses generated by the interviewer and our best-estimate OPCRIT diagnoses, according to DSM–III–R and ICD–10, using Cohen kappa statistics.

Results

Excellent agreement was found between interviewer OPCRIT diagnoses and OPCRIT diagnoses made by the best-estimate lifetime consensus procedure for DSM–III–R (κ=0.83) and ICD-10 (κ=0.81)

Conclusions

Results suggest that this procedure for diagnostic assessment is an efficient alternative to classic best-estimate diagnosis procedures.

Type
Papers
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 175 , Issue 2 , August 1999 , pp. 154 - 157
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 The Royal College of Psychiatrists 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

∗

Presented at the Sixth World Congress on Psychiatric Genetics, Bonn, Germany, 7–10 October 1998.

References

Altman, D. G. (ed.) (1994) Practical Statistics for Medical Research. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association (1980) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (3rd edn) (DSM–III). Washington. DC: APA.Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association (1987) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (3rd edn, revised) (DSM–III–R). Washington, DC: APA.Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association (1994) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th edn) (DSM–IV). Washington, DC: APA.Google Scholar
Azevedo, M. H. P., Dourado, A., Valenta, J., et al (1993a) The Portuguese version of the Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies. Neuropsychiatric Genetics, 3, 189.Google Scholar
Azevedo, M. H. P., Valente, J., Macado, A., et al (1993b) Versão Portuguesa da “Entrevista Diagnóstica para Estudos Genéticos”. Psiquiatria Clinica, 14, 213–217.Google Scholar
Craddock, N., Asherson, P., Owen, M. J., et al (1996) Concurrent validity of the OPCRIT diagnostic system. Comparison of OPCRIT diagnoses with consensus best-estimate lifetime diagnoses. British Journal of Psychiatry, 169, 58–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Felghner, J., Robins, E., Guze, S., et al (1972) Diagnostic criteria for use in psychiatric research. Archives of General Psychiatry, 26, 57–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leckman, J. F., Sholomskas, D., Thompson, D., et al (1982) Best estimate of psychiatric diagnoses. Archives of General Psychiatry, 39, 879–883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mannuzza, S., Fyer, A. J., Martin, L. Y., et al (1989) Reliability of anxiety assessment. Archives of General Psychiatry, 49, 1093–2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazure, C. & Gershon, E. S. (1979) Blindness and reliability in lifetime psychiatric diagnosis. Archives of General Psychiatry, 36, 521–525.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGuffin, P. Farmer, A., Harvey, I., et al (1991) A polydiagnostic application of operational criteria in studies of psychotic illness. Archives of General Psychiatry, 48, 764–770.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nurnberger, J. I., Blehar, M. C., Kaufmann, C. A., et al (1994) Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies: rationale, unique features, and training. Archives of General Psychiatry, 51, 849–859.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roy, M.-A., Lanctôt, G., Mérette, C., et al (1997) Clinical and methodological factors related to reliability of the best-estimate diagnostic procedure. American Journal of Psychiatry, 154, 1726–1733.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soares, M. J., Dourado, A., Macedo, A., et al (1997) Estudo de Fidelidade da Lista de Critérios Operacionais Para Doenças Pskóticas. Psiquiatria Clinica, 18, 11–24.Google Scholar
Spitzer, R. L., Endicott, J. & Robins, E. (1978) Research Diagnostic Criteria: Rationale and reliability. Archives of General Psychiatry, 35, 773–782.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, J., Farmer, A. E., Ackenhell, M., et al (1996) A multicentre inter-rater reliability study using the OPCRIT computerised diagnostic system. Psychological Medicine, 26, 775–783.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Health Organization (1992) The Tenth Revison of the International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD–10). Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.