Article contents
Addiction and After
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 January 2018
Abstract
The development of the British response to ‘the drugs problem’ since the 1960s does not lend itself readily to any optimistic interpretation. The initial wave of enthusiasm for clinics during the latter years of the 1960s soon faded. The clinic system was deprived of sufficient support, and many staff became disillusioned and burnt out. Treatment and responses gradually changed, not as the result of any clearly thought-out policy, but as the result of a vague drift of views.
- Type
- Annotation
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1988
References
Callahan, E. J. (1980) Alternative strategies in the treatment of narcotic addiction. In The Addictive Behaviours (ed. Miller, W. R.). Oxford, New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Einstein, S. (1966) The narcotics dilemma: who is listening to what?
International Journal of the Addictions, 1, 1–6.Google Scholar
Gossop, M., Green, L., Phillips, G. & Bradley, B. (1987) What happens to opiate addicts immediately after treatment: a prospective follow-up study. British Medical Journal, 294, 1377–1380.Google Scholar
Gossop, M., Johns, A. & Green, L. (1986) Opiate withdrawal: inpatient versus outpatient programmes and preferred versus random assignment to treatment. British Medical Journal, 293, 103–104.Google Scholar
House Of Commons Home Affairs Committee. (1985) Misuse of Hard Drugs
(interim report). Fifth report from the Home Affairs Committee. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Schur, E. (1963) Narcotic Addiction in Britain and America. The Impact of Public Policy. London: Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar
- 4
- Cited by
eLetters
No eLetters have been published for this article.