Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T21:42:36.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Antidepressant quandaries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 January 2018

R. P. Greenberg
R. P. Greenberg*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, State University of New York Health Science Center, 750 East Adams Street
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Columns
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 173 , Issue 2 , August 1998 , pp. 180 - 181
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 The Royal College of Psychiatrists 

References

Greenberg, R. P., Bornstein, R. F., Zborowski, M. J., et al (1994) A meta-analysis of fluoxetine outcome in the treatment of depression. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 182, 517–551.Google Scholar
Greenberg, R. P. & Fisher, S. (1989) Examining antidepressant effectiveness: Findings, ambiguities, and some vexing puzzles. In The Limits of Biological Treatments for Psychological Distress: Comparisons with Psychotherapy and Placebo (eds Fisher, S. & Greenberg, R. P.), pp. 1–37, Hillsdale, NJ: Ertbaum.Google Scholar
Greenberg, R. P. & Fisher, S. (1997) Mood-mending medicines: probing drug, psychotherapy and placebo solutions. In From Placebo to Panacea: Putting Psychiatric Drugs to the Test (eds Fisher, S. & Greenberg, R. P.), pp. 115–172. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Huty, D. (1991) Commentary: Meta-analysis of trials comparing antidepressants with active placebos. British Journal of Psychiatry, 171, 232–234.Google Scholar
Moncrieff, J., Wesseley, S. & Hardy, R. (1998) Meta-analysis of trials comparing antidepressants with active placebos. British Journal of Psychiatry, 172, 227–231.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.