Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T23:22:42.500Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Author's reply

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

D. Arnone*
Affiliation:
Neuroscience and Psychiatry Unit, University of Manchester, G810 Stopford Building, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PT, UK. Email: danilo.arnone@manchester.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Columns
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2010 

We are grateful to Drs Vita, Peri and Sacchetti, who raise the very important point that morphometric abnormalities detectable in first-onset bipolar disorder appear different from those described in chronic patients. An observation which, as Vita et al suggest, may underpin important information about the pathogenesis of the disorder and would benefit from clarification emerging from longitudinal studies. Prompted by their meta-analysis Reference Vita, De Peri and Sacchetti1 and our own work, Reference Arnone, Cavanagh, Gerber, Lawrie, Ebmeier and McIntosh2 we have conducted further analyses by including only patients with first-episode bipolar disorder v. healthy controls. Despite methodological differences and different inclusion and exclusion criteria, we are in agreement with Vita et al. We found no evidence of whole-brain volume reduction in the first-episode patients v. healthy controls (effect size –0.23; 95% CI –0.47 to 0.002; I 2 = 0, P = 0.51; Egger's P = 0.31). This finding supports Vita et al's hypothesis that whole-brain volume loss may be occurring with illness progression and/or its epiphenomena (e.g. number of episodes, pharmacological treatment). Similarly we found no evidence of gray matter loss (effect size –0.02; 95% CI –0.40 to 0.37; I 2 = 0.02, P = 0.36; Egger's P = 0.16) but significant white matter volumetric reduction in the first-episode patients v. healthy controls (effect size –0.45; 95% CI –0.85 to –0.06; I 2 = 0.04, P = 0.35; Egger's P = 0.68). These and other observations Reference Sussmann, Lymer, McKirdy, Moorhead, Maniega and Job3,Reference McIntosh, Maniega, Lymer, McKirdy, Hall and Sussmann4 support the possibility that white matter deficits have a particular relevance to the aetiology of bipolar disorder. However, the paucity of first-episode studies is reflected in the relatively wide confidence intervals around our estimates. Further studies of patients with first-episode bipolar disorder, as well as cohort and high-risk studies, are necessary if we are to improve our understanding of the role of structural changes in the pathogenesis of this condition.

Footnotes

Edited by Kiriakos Xenitidis and Colin Campbell

References

1 Vita, A, De Peri, L, Sacchetti, E. Gray matter, white matter, brain, and intracranial volumes in first-episode bipolar disorder: a meta-analysis of magnetic resonance imaging studies. Bipolar Disord 2009; 11: 807–14.Google Scholar
2 Arnone, D, Cavanagh, J, Gerber, D, Lawrie, SM, Ebmeier, KP, McIntosh, AM. Magnetic resonance imaging studies in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia: meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry 2009; 195: 194201.Google Scholar
3 Sussmann, JE, Lymer, GK, McKirdy, J, Moorhead, TW, Maniega, SM, Job, D, et al. White matter abnormalities in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia detected using diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging. Bipolar Disord 2009; 11: 11–8Google Scholar
4 McIntosh, AM, Maniega, SM, Lymer, GK, McKirdy, J, Hall, J, Sussmann, JE, et al. White matter tractography in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry 2008; 64: 1088–92.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.