Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-vt8vv Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-08-18T10:04:52.204Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dancing with distress: helping people transform psychological problems with the Method of Levels two-step

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 January 2009

Timothy A. Carey
Timothy A. Carey*
Affiliation:
Centre for Applied Psychology, University of Canberra, ACT, Australia
*
*Author for correspondence: Dr T. A. Carey, Centre for Applied Psychology, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia. (email: Tim.Carey@canberra.edu.au)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Method of Levels (MOL) shares many similarities with other therapeutic approaches and is perhaps most distinguishable by what it does not include rather than what it does use in sessions. MOL has two basic steps which are followed in an iterative procedure until the patient/client experiences a change or shift in their understanding and experience of a problem. This article explains the steps and uses examples and suggestions for practice to promote understanding.

Keywords

Angeranxietycognitive therapycontroldepression
Type
Practice article
Information
the Cognitive Behaviour Therapist , Volume 2 , Issue 3 , September 2009 , pp. 167 - 177
Copyright
Copyright © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Recommended follow-up reading

Carey, TA (2008). Hold that Thought! Two Steps to Effective Counseling and Psychotherapy with the Method of Levels. Chapel Hill, NC: New View Publications.Google Scholar
Carey, TA (2006). The Method of Levels: How to Do Psychotherapy without Getting in the Way. Hayward, CA: Living Control Systems Publishing.Google Scholar
Powers, WT (1998). Making Sense of Behavior. New Canaan, CT: Benchmark Publications.Google Scholar

References

Carey, TA (2006). The Method of Levels: How to do psychotherapy without getting in the way. Hayward, CA: Living Control Systems Publishing.Google Scholar
Carey, TA (2008 a). Conflict, as the Achilles heel of perceptual control, offers a unifying approach to the formulation of psychological problems. Counselling Psychology Review 23, 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, TA (2008 b). Hold that Thought! Two Steps to Effective Counseling and Psychotherapy with the Method of Levels. Chapel Hill, NC: New View Publications.Google Scholar
Carey, TA (2008 c). Perceptual Control Theory and the Method of Levels: further contributions to a transdiagnostic perspective. International Journal of Cognitive Therapy 1, 237–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansell, W (2005). Control theory and psychopathology: an integrative approach. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice 78, 1–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Powers, WT (2005). Behavior: The Control of Perception, 2nd edn. New Canaan, CT: Benchmark Publications.Google Scholar
Powers, WT (1998). Making Sense of Behavior. New Canaan, CT: Benchmark Publications.Google Scholar
Strosahl, KD, Hayes, SC, Wilson, KG, Gifford, EV (2004). An ACT primer: core therapy processes, intervention strategies, and therapist competencies. In: A Practical Guide to Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ed. Hayes, S. C. and Strosahl, K. D.), pp. 31–58. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, A (2005). The metacognitive model of GAD: Assessment of meta-worry and relationship with DSM-IV generalized anxiety disorder. Cognitive Therapy and Research 29, 107–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.