Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-wxhwt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T09:02:53.352Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

“You act as Human, and I will act as AI”

Technological Rehearsals at the Interface

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2024

Abstract

Chatbots and natural language processing tools have emerged as a ubiquitous yet exceptional development of algorithmic performativity. The release of ChatGPT on 30 November 2022 signaled a sea change in language-learning technological-performative relations. ChatGPT programs human knowledge as a stylized, computational performance and rehearses the human as technological.

Type
Student Essay Contest Winner
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press for Tisch School of the Arts/NYU

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Barthes, Roland. 1977. “The Death of the Author.” In Image Music Text, ed. and trans. Stephen Heath, 142–48. Fontana.Google Scholar
Baudrillard, Jean. (1981) 1994. “The Precession of Simulacra.” In Simulacra and Simulation, trans. Sheila Faria Glaser, 1–42. University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Ruha. 2019. Race After Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code. Polity.Google Scholar
Berry, David M. 2011. The Philosophy of Software: Code and Mediation in the Digital Age. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Center for AI Safety. 2023. “Statement on AI Risk.” Accessed 1 December 2023. www.safe.ai/statement-on-ai-risk Google Scholar
ChatGPT, and Fang, Kathy. 2023a. Interview with author, 29 January, OpenAI. chat.openai.com/share/849156b3-60f3-4f36-a449-646c12a1b8edGoogle Scholar
ChatGPT, and Fang, Kathy. 2023b. Interview with author, 4 April, OpenAI. chat.openai.com/share/328c0b9a-f6e9-4490-bbec-4202fcab5410Google Scholar
ChatGPT, and Fang, Kathy. 2023c. Interview with author, 20 and 30 April, OpenAI. chat.openai.com/share/bbb74318-77f7-4a0b-b94a-1ca4b554d691Google Scholar
ChatGPT, and Fang, Kathy. 2023d. Interview with author, 22 April, OpenAI. chat.openai.com/share/07ae8466-e21d-4b2d-ab69-3a2f164d3d50Google Scholar
ChatGPT, and Fang, Kathy. 2023e. Interview with author, 1 December, OpenAI. chat.openai.com/share/d755eced-b87c-4a32-b801-9bf38b02f408Google Scholar
Chun, Wendy Hui Kyong. 2021. Discriminating Data: Correlation, Neighborhoods, and the New Politics of Recognition. The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chocolate Factory. 2023. Annie Dorsen, Prometheus Firebringer, 11–13 May, program. chocolatefactorytheater.org/wp-content/uploads/docs/annie_dorsen_playbill_2023.pdfGoogle Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1978. “The Theatre of Cruelty and the Closure of Representation.” Trans. Alan Bass. Theater 9, 3:619.Google Scholar
Dorsen, Annie. 2012. “On Algorithmic Theater.” Theater 42, 2. theatermagazine.org/web-features/article/algorithmic-theater Google Scholar
Dorsen, Annie. 2023. Prometheus Firebringer. Unpublished manuscript, 13 May performance.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. (1969) 1998. “What is an Author?” Trans. Josué V. Harari. In Aesthetics, Method, and Epistemology, ed. James D. Faubion, 205–22. The New Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. (1975) 1995. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Trans. Alan Sheridan. Vintage.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. (1954) 2003. “The Question Concerning Technology.” Trans. William Lovitt. In Philosophy of Technology: The Technological Condition, ed. Robert C. Scharff and Val Dusek, 252–65. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Laurel, Brenda. (1991) 2013. Computers as Theatre. Addison-Wesley Professional.Google Scholar
McKenzie, Jon. 2001. Perform or Else: From Discipline to Performance. Routledge.Google ScholarPubMed
Metz, Cade. 2023. “Microsoft Says New A.I. Shows Signs of Human Reasoning.” New York Times, 16 May. www.nytimes.com/2023/05/16/technology/microsoft-ai-human-reasoning.html Google Scholar
Nature. 2023. “Tools Such as ChatGPT Threaten Transparent Science; Here Are Our Ground Rules for Their Use.” Nature 613. doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00191-1 Google Scholar
Nakamura, Lisa. 2007. Digitizing Race: Visual Cultures of the Internet. University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Omiye, Jesutofunmi A., Lester, Jenna C., Spichak, Simon, Rotemberg, Veronica, and Daneshjou, Roxana. 2023. “Large Language Models Propagate Race-Based Medicine.” npj Digital Medicine 6, 195. doi.org/10.1038/s41746-023-00939-z Google ScholarPubMed
OpenAI. 2022. “Introducing ChatGPT.” OpenAI, 30 November. openai.com/blog/chatgptGoogle Scholar
OpenAI. 2023. “GPT-4.” OpenAI, 14 March. openai.com/research/gpt-4Google Scholar
OpenAI. 2024. “ChatGPT—Release Notes.” OpenAI. Accessed 25 February 2024. help.openai.com/en/articles/6825453-chatgpt-release-notesGoogle Scholar
Prestage, Andrew. 2002. “Word Processing.” In Encyclopedia of Information Systems, ed. Hossein Bidgoli, 661–71. Elsevier.Google Scholar
Roose, Kevin. 2023. “A.I. Poses ‘Risk of Extinction,’ Industry Leaders Warn.” New York Times, 30 May. www.nytimes.com/2023/05/30/technology/ai-threat-warning.html Google Scholar
Sample, Ian. 2023. “Science Journals Ban Listing of ChatGPT as Co-author on Papers.” The Guardian, 26 January. www.theguardian.com/science/2023/jan/26/science-journals-ban-listing-of-chatgpt-as-co-author-on-papers Google Scholar
Schechner, Richard. 1982. “Collective Reflexivity: Restoration of Behavior.” In A Crack in the Mirror: Reflexive Perspectives in Anthropology, ed. Jay Ruby, 39–81. University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Searle, John R. 1980. “Minds, Brains, and Programs.” The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, 3:417–24. doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005756 Google Scholar
Stiegler, Bernard. (1994) 1998. Technics and Time 1: The Fault of Epimetheus. Trans. Beardsworth, Richard and Collins, George. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Stiegler, Bernard. (1996) 2009. Technics and Time 2: Disorientation. Trans. Barker, Stephen. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Stokel-Walker, Chris. 2023. “ChatGPT Listed as Author on Research Papers: Many Scientists Disapprove.” Nature 613:620–21. doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00107-zCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swyzen, Claire. 2018. “Kaldor and Dorsen’s ‘desktop performances’ and the (Live) Coauthorship Paradox.” The Journal of American Drama and Theatre 30, 2. jadtjournal.org/2018/05/29/kaldor-and-dorsens-desktop-performances/ Google Scholar
Tiku, Nitasha, Schaul, Kevin, and Yu Chen, Szu. 2023. “These Fake Images Reveal how AI Amplifies our Worst Stereotypes.” The Washington Post, 1 November. www.washingtonpost.com/technology/interactive/2023/ai-generated-images-bias-racism-sexism-stereotypes/ Google Scholar
Timplalexi, Eleni. 2016. “The Human and the Chatterbot: Tracing the Potential of Transdimensional Performance.” Performance Research 21, 5:5964. doi.org/10.1080/13528165.2016.1223449 Google Scholar
Turing, Alan M. 1950. “Computing Machinery and Intelligence.” Mind 59, 236:433–60. www.jstor.org/stable/2251299 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walton, Robert Ellis. 2021. “Theatres of Artificial Intelligence and the Overlooked Performances of Computing.” Theatre Journal 73, 3:279–98. doi.org/10.1353/tj.2021.0067 Google Scholar
Worthen, W.B. 2020. Shakespeare, Technicity, Theatre. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

TDReadings

Cossette, Marc-André, and Salter, Chris. 2024. “Performing AI: Labor and Complexity on the Contemporary Stage.” TDR 68, 1 (T261):70–86. doi.org/10.1017/S1054204323000588Google Scholar
Condee, William, and Rountree, Barry. 2020. “Nonmaterial Performance.” TDR 64, 4 (T248):147–57. doi.org/10.1162/dram_a_00969Google Scholar
Moretti, Lisa. 2024. “I Become a Pattern.” TDR 68, 1 (T261):142. doi.org/10.1017/S105420432300059XGoogle Scholar
van Heerden, Imke, Çada≡ Duman, and Anil Bas. 2023. “Performing the Post-Anthropocene: AI: When a Robot Writes a Play.” TDR 67, 4 (T260):104–20. doi.org/10.1017/S1054204323000448Google Scholar