Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T22:27:38.197Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Can progressive macroeconomic policy address growth and employment while reducing inequality in South Africa?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

Vishnu Padayachee*
Affiliation:
University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
*
Vishnu Padayachee, School of Economic and Business Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, 1 Jan Smuts Avenue, Braamfontein 2000, Johannesburg 2001, Gauteng, South Africa. Email: vishnu.padayachee@wits.ac.za

Abstract

This article aims to set out some progressive, mainly post-Keynesian, macroeconomic policy ideas for debate and further research in the context of macroeconomic challenges faced by South Africa today. Despite some successes, including at reducing poverty, the South African economy has been characterised by low growth, rising unemployment and increasing inequality, which together with rampant corruption and governance failures combine to threaten the very core of the country’s stability and democracy. The neo-liberal economic policies that the African National Congress–led government surprisingly adopted in 1996 in order to assuage global markets sceptical of its historical support for dirigiste economic policy, have simply not worked. Appropriate progressive macroeconomic interventions are urgently needed to head off the looming prospect of a failed state in the country which Nelson Mandela led to democracy after his release from prison in February 1990. What happens in Africa’s southern tip should still matter for progressives all around the world. The article draws on both history and theory to demonstrate the roots of such progressive heterodox economic thinking and support for a more carefully coordinated activist state-led macroeconomic policy, both in general terms and in the South African context. It shows that such approaches to growth and development – far from being populist – also have a rich history and respectable theoretical pedigree behind them and are worthy of inclusion in the South African policy debate.

Type
Post-crisis rebuilding: national perspectives
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashman, S, Fine, B, Newman, S (2011) Amnesty International? The rate, scale and impact of capital flight from South Africa. Journal of Southern African Studies 37(1): 725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, A (2015) Inequality, What Can Be Done? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beattie, A (2012) IMF drops opposition to capital controls. Financial Times, 3 December. Available at: https://www.ft.com/content/e620482e-3d5c-11e2-9e13-00144feabdc0 (accessed 5 January 2019).Google Scholar
Blanchard, O (2009) The state of macro. Annual Review of Economics 1: 209228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bound, J, Johnson, G (1995) What are the causes of rising wage inequality in the United States? Federal Reserve Bank of New York: Economic Policy Review 1(1): 917.Google Scholar
Braunstein, E, Seguino, S (2018) The impact of economic policy and structural change on gender employment inequality in Latin America 1990–2010. Review of Keynesian Economics 6(3): 307332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown-Collier, E, Collier, B (1995) What Keynes really said about deficit spending. Journal of Post-Keynesian Economics 17(3): 341355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browne, G (1973) Fiscal policy in South Africa. In: Lombard, JA (ed.) Economic Policy in South Africa: Selected Essays. 2nd ed. Cape Town, South Africa: Haum, pp. 125.Google Scholar
Chang, H-J, Grabel, I (2004) Reclaiming development from the Washington Consensus. Journal of Post-Keynesian Economics 27(2): 273291.Google Scholar
Chibber, V (2017) Our road to power. Jacobin Magazine, 5 December. Available at: https://jacobinmag.com/2017/12/our-road-to-power (accessed 5 January 2019).Google Scholar
Chowdhury, A, Islam, I (2011) A critique of the orthodox approach to Indonesia’s growth and employment problems and post Keynesian alternatives. American Journal of Economics and Sociology 70(1): 269299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chowdhury, A, Islam, I (2012) The debate on expansionary fiscal consolidation: how robust is the evidence? Economic and Labour Relations Review 23(3): 1338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comert, H, Epstein, G (2011) Inflation targeting in South Africa: friend or foe of development? Economic History of Developing Regions 26(Suppl. 1): S94S113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dullien, S, Herr, H, Kellermann, C (2011) Decent Capitalism. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Epstein, G, Maimov, M (1999) Hit and miss? A critique of inflation targeting and an alternative proposal for the Reserve Bank of South Africa. Johannesburg: National Institute for Economic Policy (NIEP) occasional paper series, no. 17 , October.Google Scholar
Erwin, A (2016) The Thabo Mbeki I Knew. Johannesburg, South Africa: Picador.Google Scholar
Gildenhuys, JSH (1989) Owerheidsfinansies. Pretoria, South Africa: Van Schaik.Google Scholar
Hein, E (2016) Post-Keynesian macroeconomics since the mid-1990s: main developments. Working paper 75/2016. Berlin: Institute for International Political Economy. Available at: https://www.boeckler.de/pdf/v_2016_10_20_hein_paper.pdf (accessed 5 January 2019).Google Scholar
Herndon, T, Ash, M, Pollin, R (2013) Does high public debt consistently stifle economic growth? A critique of Reinhart and Rogoff. Cambridge Journal of Economics 38(2): 257279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaboub, F (2007) Employment guarantee programs: a survey of theories and policy experiences. Levy Institute working paper no. 498. Available at: http://www.levyinstitute.org/pubs/wp_498.pdf (accessed 5 January 2019).Google Scholar
Keynes, JM (2015) The Essential Keynes. London: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, N (2015) Monetary policy and inequality. Masterproefvoorgedragen tot het bekomen van de graad van Master of Science in de EconomischeWetenschappen (Thesis presented for the degree of Masters of Economics Sciences), University of Ghent, Ghent.Google Scholar
McKinley, D (2017) South Africa’s Corporatised Liberation: A Critical Analysis of the ANC in Power. Johannesburg, South Africa: Jacana.Google Scholar
Macroeconomic Research Group (MERG) (1993) Making Democracy Work: A Framework for Macroeconomic Policy in South Africa. Cape Town, South Africa: CDS Publications.Google Scholar
Mattes, R (2014) South Africa’s emerging black middle class: a harbinger of political change? Afro-Barometer working paper no. 151. Available at: https://afrobarometer.org/sites/default/files/publications/Working%20paper/Afropaperno151.pdf (accessed 5 January 2019).Google Scholar
Mazzucato, M (2018) The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public vs. Private Sector Myths. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Meth, C (2004) Ideology and social policy: ‘handouts’ and the spectre of ‘dependency’. Transformation 56: 130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, W, Fazi, T (2017) Reclaiming the State: A Progressive Vision of Sovereignty for a Post-Neoliberal World. London: Pluto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostry, J, Loungani, P, Furceri, D (2016) Neo-liberalism: oversold? Finance and Development 53(2): 3841.Google Scholar
Padayachee, V (2015) South African Reserve Bank independence: the debate revisited. Transformation 89: 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padayachee, V, van Niekerk, R (in press) Shadows of Liberation – The History of ANC Economic and Social Policy (1943–1996).Google Scholar
Palley, T (2017) A theory of economic policy lock-in and lock-out via hysteresis: rethinking economists’ approach to economic policy. Economics 11(4): 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palley, T (2018) Government spending and the income-expenditure model: the multiplier, spending composition and job-guarantee programs. FNM working paper no. 30 , July. Dusseldorf: Forum for Macroeconomics and Macroeconomic Policy (FMM), Macroeconomic Policy Institute (IMK).Google Scholar
Pettinger, T (2013) The Treasury View. Economics Help, 26 January. Available at: https://www.economicshelp.org/blog/6760/economics/the-treasury-view/ (accessed 5 January 2019).Google Scholar
Pressman, S (2015) Understanding Piketty’s Capital in the Twenty-First Century. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Public Service Accountability Monitor (PSAM) (2018) Civil society calls on the Finance Minister to deliver a pro-poor 2018 budget. 20 February. Available at: http://www.psam.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Workshop-statement-Final.pdf (accessed 30 April 2018).Google Scholar
Rauchway, E (2015) The Money Makers: How Roosevelt and Keynes Ended the Depression, Defeated Fascism, and Secured a Prosperous Peace. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Reinert, S (2005) The Italian tradition of political economy: theories and policies of development in the semi-periphery of enlightenment. In: Jomo, KS, Erik Reinert, E (eds) Origins of Development Economics. London: Zed Books, pp. 2447.Google Scholar
Reinhart, C, Rogoff, KS (2010) Growth in a time of debt. American Economic Review 100(2): 573578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossouw, J, Joubert, F, Breytenbach, A (2014) South Africa’s fiscal cliff: a reflection on the appropriation of government resources. Journal of Humanities 54(1): 144162.Google Scholar
Skidelsky, R (2009) Keynes: The Return of the Master. New York: Public Affairs Press.Google Scholar
Sumberg, T (1991) Antonio Serra: a neglected herald of the acquisitive system. American Journal of Economics and Sociology 50(3): 365373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supple, BE (1954) Thomas Mun and the commercial crisis. Historical Research 27(75): 9194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tridico, P, Meloni, WP (2018) Economic growth, welfare models and inequality in the context of globalisation. Economic and Labour Relations Review 29(1): 118139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wasson, G (1960) Beveridge’s ‘full employment in a free society’. In: Hazlitt, H (ed.) The Critics of Keynesian Economics. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand, pp. 212231.Google Scholar