Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T21:33:56.402Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Economics of the Australian Waterfront Dispute

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

Tim Harcourt
Tim Harcourt*
Affiliation:
Australian Council of Trade Unions, Melbourne
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Industrial Relations returned to the forefront of the Australian public debate in 1998 with the dispute between the Federal Government and Patrick Stevedores on the one hand and the Maritime Union of Australia (MUA) on the other. This article, which was written in April 1998 at the height of the dispute, concentrates on the economic issues involved and the facts about ‘waterfront reform’. The article analyses the economic aspects of the dispute in terms of employment issues, productivity issues, industrial relations and the relationship between waterfront reform and Australia’s international trade. It concludes that economic issues must be understood carefully in order to distinguish between genuine practical concerns about waterfront efficiency and purely political points made by those who oppose the MUA and trade unionism in general.

Type
Symposium on the Waterfront Dispute
Information
The Economic and Labour Relations Review , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , December 1998 , pp. 222 - 235
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 1998

Footnotes

*

The author would like to thank Jane Howard for her assistance and Greg Combet, Tony Morison, Tas Bull and an anonymous referee for comments.

References

ACTU (1998) ‘Fact Statement for Union Members re Maritime Dispute,’ ACTU, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Daily Telegraph (1998) ‘A Battle Wharfies Can’t Win,’ 3 March.Google Scholar
Drewry Shipping Consultants (1998) ‘World Container Terminals: Global Growth and Private Profit,’ Drewry House, London, UK.Google Scholar
Hamilton, C (1998) ‘Productivity in Australian Container Terminals — New Evidence for an International Study,’ The Australia Institute, Canberra.Google Scholar
Hewson, J, Fischer, (1991) ‘Fightback!,’ Liberal and National Parties of Australia, Canberra.Google Scholar
House of Representatives (1992) ‘Warehouse to Wharf,’ HR Standing Committee on Transport, Communications and Infrastructure, April.Google Scholar
HSBC Markets (1998) ‘The HSBC Australia Trade Report: Special Issue — The Impact of the Waterfront Dispute,’ HSBC Markets, Sydney, 23 April 1998.Google Scholar
Mitchell, B (1998) ‘Federal Government Plans Full Overhaul of Waterfront’, The Age, 9 April.Google Scholar
Molloy, P (1998) ‘Wharifie on $90,000 did 14 Hour Week’, Daily Telegraph, 3 March. Productivity Commission (1998) International Benchmarking of the Australian Waterfront, April, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Quiggin, J (1998) ‘The Perils of Waterfront Reform’, Australian Financial Review, 29 January.Google Scholar
Sloan, J, Robertson, F (1997) ‘Selected Analysis of Employment Conditions of Workers on the Australian Waterfront and Seafaring,’ National Institute of Labour Studies (NILS) WP145 November, Summary in December 1997 issue of Australian Bulletin of Labour.Google Scholar