No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Enterprise Bargaining: The Truth — A Comment
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 January 2023
Extract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
In a recent paper in this Review, Rimmer and Watts (1994) are critical of our attempt to relate trade union activity to the only data on workplace productivity generated by the Australian Workplace Industrial Relations Survey [AWIRS], Crockett, Dawkins and Mulvey (1993). Their criticism is based on the fact that the data on productivity were gathered by asking managers to rank the productivity of their workplace relative to other workplaces in the industry on a five point scale ranging from ‘a lot higher’ through ‘average’ to ‘a lot lower’.
- Type
- Shorter Paper and Comment
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s) 1994
References
Crockett, G., Dawkins, , Mulvey, C. (1993) ‘The Impact of Unions on Workplace Productivity and Profitability in Australian Workplaces’. ACIRRT, The Economics and Labour Relations of Australian Workplaces, Monograph No. 10, Sydney.Google Scholar
Crockett, G., Dawkins, P., Miller, P. W., Mulvey, C. (1992) ‘The Impact of Unions on Workplace Productivity in Australia’, Australian Bulletin of Labour, 18:2 119–141.Google Scholar
Drago, R., Wooden, M. (1992) ‘The Australian Workplace Industrial Relations Survey and Workplace Performance’, Australian Bulletin of Labour, 18:2 142–167.Google Scholar
Rimmer, M., Watts, L. (1994) ‘Enterprise Bargaining: The Truth Revealed at Last’, Economic and Labour Relations Review, 5:1 62–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
You have
Access