Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T07:23:26.284Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Industrial Relations and the World Economic Crisis in the Context of Globalisation: From Europe to the World

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

Giulio Sapelli
Translated by
Joseph Halevi
Giulio Sapelli*
Affiliation:
l'Università Statale di Milano
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

It would be difficult to maintain that prevailing theories of industrial relations have been able to comprehend the tendencies that emerged in the recent world economic crisis (Sapelli 2008). State of the art discussions and scientific predictions circulating in Europe shortly before the crisis were dominated by functionalist theories. According to these approaches, the European monetary union and the liberalisation process should have brought about, through a mechanical institutional and social adjustment, a convergence in the behaviour of individual actors and especially the behaviour of the collective bodies through which interest groups are organised. These views, which failed entirely to perceive the approaching crisis, affirmed the universal validity of so-called neocorporatist concentration.

Type
Contributed Article
Information
The Economic and Labour Relations Review , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , December 2009 , pp. 111 - 122
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2009

References

Astudillo, J. (1999) En interes de quien?: Las estrategias sindicales de ambito nacional ante la reformas economicas en America Latina, Estudio/Working Paper 1999/136. Instituto Juan March de Estudios e Investigaciones, Madrid, June.Google Scholar
Bamber, G., Lansbury, R., Wailes, N. (2004), International and Comparative Employment Relations: Globalisation and the Developed Market Economies, Allen and Unwin, Crows Nest.Google Scholar
Benson, J., Zhu, Y. (2008), Trade Unions in Asia: An Economic and Sociological Analysis, Routledge, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bobrow, D. B. (1999) ‘Hegemony management: The US in the Asia Pacific’, Pacific Review, 12(2), pp. 173–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bognanno, M., Budd, J., Lee, Y. M. (1994) ‘Institutional turmoil and strike activity in Korea’, The Journal of Industrial Relations, 36(3), pp. 353–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J, Arato, A. (1992), Civil Society and Political Theory, MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Crouch, C. (1995) ‘Reconstructing corporatism? Organized decentralization and other paradoxes' in Crouch, C., Traxler, F. (eds) Organized Industrial Relations in Europe: What Future?, Ashgate, Aldershot, pp. 311–330.Google Scholar
Crouch, C. (1998) ‘Revised diversity: From the neo-liberal decade to beyond Maastricht’ in Van Ruysseveldt, J., Visser, J. (eds) (1996) Industrial Relations in Europe. Traditions and Transitions, Sage Publications, London, pp. 265–309.Google Scholar
Crouch, C., Traxler, F. (eds) (1995), Organized Industrial Relations in Europe: What Future?, Ashgate, Aldershot.Google Scholar
Di Tella, T. S. (1998), Los partidos politicos. Teoria y analisis comparativo, A-Z Editora, Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
Ferner, A., Hyman, R. (eds) (1998), Changing Industrial Relations in Europe, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Ferrante, M., Zan, S. (1994), Il fenomeno organizzativo, N.I.S., Rome.Google Scholar
Ford, M. (2007) ‘Indonesia's new unions' in Phelan, C. (ed.) Trade Union Revitalisation: Trends and Prospects in 34 Countries, Peter Lang, Oxford and Bern, pp. 533–546.Google Scholar
Gospel, H. F. (1992) ‘The single European market and industrial relations — an introduction’, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 30(4), pp. 483–494.Google Scholar
Jeong, J. (2007), Industrial Relations in Korea: Diversity and Dynamism of Korean Enterprise Unions from a Comparative Perspective, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Keman, H., Pennings, P. (1995) ‘Managing political and societal conflict in democracies: Do consensus and corporatism matter?’, British Journal of Political Sciences, 25(2), pp. 271–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kjellberg, A. (1996) ‘Sweden: Restoring the model?’ in Ferner, A., Hyman, R. (eds) Changing Industrial Relations in Europe, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 74–117.Google Scholar
Lijphart, A. (1984), Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries, Yale University Press, New Haven, Conn.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, A., Crepaz, M. (1991) ‘Corporatism and consenus democracy in eighteen countries: Conceptual and empirical linkages', British Journal of Political Sciences, 21, pp. 235–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macdonald, D., Burgess, J. (1998) ‘Globalisation and industrial relations in the Hunter region’, The Journal of Industrial Relations, 40(1), pp. 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pirie, I. (2007), The Korean Developmental State: From Dirigisme to Neo-Liberalism, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Polanyi, K. (1944), The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of our Time, Farrar & Rinehart, New York.Google Scholar
Sadler, D. (2004) ‘Trade unions, coalitions and communities: Australia's Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union and the international stakeholder campaign against Rio Tinto’, Geoforum, 35(1), pp. 35–46.Google Scholar
Sapelli, G. (1986), Comunità e mercato, Il Mulino, Bologna.Google Scholar
Sapelli, G. (1990), Modelli culturali e rappresentanza imprenditoriale. Il caso Federmeccanica, ETAS KOMPAS, Milan.Google Scholar
Sapelli, G. (1996) ‘Pluralismo associativo e riproduzione della rappresentanza’, in G. Sapelli Impresa e sindacato. Storia dell'Intersind, Il Mulino, Bologna, pp. 13–52.Google Scholar
Sapelli, G. (1997) Comunità e mercato (revised version), Rubbetino Editore, Soveria Mannelli.Google Scholar
Sapelli, G. (2008) La Crisi Economica Mondiale. Dieci considerazioni (with an afterword by G. De Lucia Lumeno), Bollari Borinfghieri, Turin.Google Scholar
Sheldon, P. (1998) ‘Regulating employment and work in Australia: A historical re-evaluation in memory of Peter Macarthy’, Journal of Industrial Relations, 40(3), pp. 355–358.Google Scholar
Sheldon, P., Thornthwaite, L. (eds) (1999), Employer Associations and Industrial Relations Change: Catalysts or Captives, Allen and Unwin, Sydney.Google Scholar
Sheldon, P., Thornthwaite, L. (1999) ‘Australian employer associations and the international experience’ in Sheldon, P., Thornthwaite, L. (eds) Employer Associations and Industrial Relations Change: Catalysts or Captives, Allen and Unwin, Sydney, pp. 197–224.Google Scholar
Sheldon, P., Jun, In (2006) ‘Looking beyond the west? The Korea Employers' Federation and the challenges of membership adhesion and cohesion’, Economic and Labour Relations Review, 17(1), pp. 203–226.Google Scholar
Tattersall, A. (2008) ‘Coalitions and community unionism: Using the term community to explore effective union-community collaboration’, Journal of Organizational Change Management, 21(4), pp. 415–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornthwaite, L. (1997) ‘Union strategy and labour-community alliance: The telephonists' exchange closure campaign, Queensland, 1978’, The Journal of Industrial Relations, 39(2), pp. 244–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tongzen, J. L. (1998), The Economies of Southeast Asia: The Growth and Development of ASEAN Economies, Edward Elgar, Chelthenham.Google Scholar
Van Ruysseveldt, J., Visser, J. (eds) (1996), Industrial Relations in Europe: Traditions and Transitions, Sage Publications, London.Google Scholar
Visser, J. (1996) ‘A truly mixed case: Industrial relations in Italy’ in Van Ruysseveldt, J., Visser, J. (eds) Industrial Relations in Europe. Traditions and Transitions, Sage, London, pp. 358–375.Google Scholar
Visser, J. (1998) ‘The Netherlands: The return of responsive corporatism’ in Ferner, A., Hyman, R. (eds) Changing Industrial Relations in Europe, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 283–314.Google Scholar
Zan, S. (1992) Organizzazione e rappresentanza. le associazioni e sindacali, N.I.S., Rome.Google Scholar