Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-68ccn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T19:50:14.565Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Industry Policy under Economic Liberalism: Policy Development in the Prime Minister’s Manufacturing Task Force

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

Ian Hampson
Ian Hampson*
Affiliation:
Industrial Relations Research Centre, The University of New South Wales, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The sudden decline in Australian manufacturing associated with the current resources boom necessitates a renewed examination of the foundations of industry policy. Since the reforms of the 1980s, industry policy has been characterised by an economic liberal approach, the purity of which has been compromised by political pragmatism — particularly evident in the continued support for the auto industry. This article examines the issues raised by industry policy, and the history of industry policy in Australia, as a context for a review of a Report recently released by the Non-Governmental Members of the Prime Minister’s Task Force on Manufacturing. This review finds useful proposals within the document, as well as a strong statement of the need for interventionist policy, albeit buried in the main text and an appendix. That this discussion is not front and centre in the Report’s presentation indicates ongoing sensitivity about the main choice in industry policy — whether the government should selectively intervene, or leave the organisation of industry to the market.

Keywords

L5Australian industry policyeconomic interventionindustry policy
Type
Article
Information
The Economic and Labour Relations Review , Volume 23 , Issue 4 , November 2012 , pp. 39 - 56
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ACTU/TDC (1987) Australian Council of Trade Unions/Trade Development Council Secretariat, Australia Reconstructed, AGPS, Canberra.Google Scholar
Bell, S. (1994) ‘State strength and state weakness: Manufacturing industry and the post-war Australian state’ in Bell, S., Head, B. (eds) State, Economy and Public Policy in Australia, Melbourne University Press, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Bello, W., Rosenfeld, S. (1990) Dragons in Distress: Asia’s Miracle Economies in Crisis, Penguin, USA.Google Scholar
Block, F. (2010) ‘Inside views: US industrial policies, R&D, and the WTO’s definition of non-actionable subsidies’, Intellectual Property Watch, 23 December, available: http://www.ip-watch.org/2010/12/23/us-industrial-policies-rd-and-the-wto’s-definition-of-non-actionable-subsidies/ [accessed 23 October 2012].Google Scholar
Capling, A., Galligan, B. (1992) Beyond the Protective State: The Political Economy of Australia’s Manufacturing Industry Policy, Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Castles, F. (1988) Australian Public Policy and Economic Vulnerability, Allen and Unwin, Sydney.Google Scholar
Conley, T., van Acker, E. (2011) ‘Whatever happened to industry policy in Australia?’ Australian Journal of Political Science, 46(3), pp. 503–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet (1991) Building a Competitive Australia, Statements by Prime Minister Bob Hawke, Treasurer Paul Keating and Industry Minister John Button, 12 March, AGPS, Canberra.Google Scholar
Dertouzos, M., Lester, R., Solow, R. (1989) Made in America—Regaining the Competitive Edge, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Deyo, F. (1989) Beneath the Miracle: Labor Subordination in the New Asian Industrialism, University of Berkeley Press, Berkeley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Economist (2010) ‘The global revival of industrial policy: Picking winners, saving losers’, Economist, 5 August.Google Scholar
Ewer, P., Higgins, W. (1986) ‘Industry policy under the Accord: Reform vs traditionalism in economic management’, Politics, 21(1), pp. 28–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewer, P., Higgins, W., Stephens, A. (1987) The Unions and the Future of Australian Manufacturing, Allen and Unwin, London.Google Scholar
Ewer, P., Hampson, I., Lloyd, C., Rainford, J., Rix, S., Smith, M. (1991) Politics and the Accord, Pluto, Sydney.Google Scholar
Garnaut, R. (1989) Australia and the North-East Asian Ascendancy, AGPS, Canberra.Google Scholar
Hampson, I. (1994) Post-Fordism and the politics of industry development in Australia, Unpublished PhD Thesis, Department of Science and Technology Studies, and Department of History and Politics, University of Wollongong.Google Scholar
Hampson, I. (1996) ‘The Accord: A post-mortem’, Labour and Industry, 7(2), pp. 55–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, P., Soskice, D. (2001) Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, Oxford University Press, England.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, R., Abernathy, W. (1980) Managing our Way to Economic Decline , Harvard Business Review, 58(4), pp. 67–77.Google Scholar
Hayes, R., Wheelwright, S. (1984) Restoring our Competitive Edge: Competing Through Manufacturing, J. Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Hirst, P., Zeitlin, J. (1991) ‘Flexible specialisation versus Post-Fordism: Theory, evidence and policy implications’, Economy and Society, 20(1), pp. 1–56.Google Scholar
Johnson, C. (1982) MITI and the Japanese Miracle: the Growth of Industrial Policy, 1925–75, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, C. (1987) ‘Political institutions and economic performance: The government-business relationship in Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan’ in Deyo, F. (ed.) The Political Economy of the New Asian Industrialisation, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.Google Scholar
Jones, E. (2006) ‘The evolution of industry policy under Howard’, Australian Review of Public Affairs, 26 February, available: http://www.australianreview.net/digest/2006/02/jones.html [accessed 21 November 2012].Google Scholar
Katzenstein, P. (1978) Between Power and Plenty: Foreign Economic Policies of Advanced Industrial Societies, University of Wisconsin Press, Maddison.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, P. (1985) Small States in World Markets, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.Google Scholar
Lall, S. (2004) Reinventing Industrial Strategy: The Role of Government Policy in Building Industrial Competitiveness, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development; Intergovernmental Group of Twenty-Four; Research papers for the Intergovernmental Group of Twenty-Four on International Monetary Affairs, G-24 Discussion Paper Series, No. 28, April.Google Scholar
Linden, G. (2004) ‘China standard time: A study in strategic industrial policy’, Business and Politics, 6(3), pp. 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKay, D., Grant, W. (1983) ‘Industrial policies in O.E.C.D. countries: An overview’, Journal of Public Policy, 3(1), pp. 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Megalogenis, G. (2006) The Longest Decade, Scribe, Sydney.Google Scholar
Mortimer, D. (1997) Going for Growth: Business Programs for Investment, Innovation and Export, Review of Business Programs, AGPS, Canberra.Google Scholar
Metal Trades Federation of Unions (MTFU) (1984) Policy for Industry Development and More Jobs, MTFU, Sydney.Google Scholar
Nozick, R. (1974) Anarchy, State and Utopia, Basic Books, US.Google Scholar
Page, S. (2007) ‘Policy space: Are WTO rules preventing development?’, Briefing Paper 14, Overseas Development Institute, January, available: http://www.odi.org.uk/resources/docs/106.pdf [accessed 22 January 2012].Google Scholar
Pappas Carter Evans and Koop/Telesis (1990) The Global Challenge: Australian Manufacturing in the 1990s, Australian Manufacturing Council, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Pempel, T., Tsunekawa, K. (1979) ‘Corporatism without labour? Japanese anomaly’ in Schmitter, P., Lehmbruch, G. (eds) Trends Towards Corparatist Intermediation, Sage, London.Google Scholar
Prime Minister’s Manufacturing Taskforce (2012), Report of the Non-Government Members, Smarter Manufacturing for a Smarter Australia, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra.Google Scholar
Quack, S., Morgan, G., Whitley, R. (eds) (2000) National Capitalisms, Global Competition and Economic Performance, John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam/Philadelphia.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodrik, D. (2004) Industrial Policy for the Twenty-First Century, John F Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, available: http://www.hks.harvard.edu/fs/drodrik/Research%20papers/UNIDOSep.pdf [accessed 21 October 2012].Google Scholar
United States Congress (2010) Report to Congress of the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission, Second Session, November, US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Warhurst, J. (1982) Jobs or Dogma, University of Queensland Press, St. Lucia.Google Scholar
Whitley, R. (1999) Divergent Capitalisms: The Social Structuring and Change of Business Systems, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Wilensky, H., Turner, L. (1987) Democratic Corporatism and Policy Linkages: The Interdependence of Industrial, Labour Market, Incomes and Social Policies in Eight Countries, Institute of International Studies, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Williams, K., Williams, J., Thomas, J. (1983) Why are the British Bad at Manufacturing?, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
Whitwell, G. (1986) The Treasury Line, Allen and Unwin, Sydney.Google Scholar
World Bank (1993) The East Asian Miracle, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
WTO (World Trade Organisation) (2012) Understanding the WTO: Overview: A Navigational Guide, available: http://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/whatis_e/tif_e/agrm1_e.htm [accessed 18 November 2012].Google Scholar
Zysman, J. (1983) Governments, Markets and Growth, Cornell University, Ithaca.Google Scholar