Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-rvbq7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T02:50:42.113Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Innovation in Isolation: Labor-Management Partnerships in the United States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

Kirsten S. Wever ,
Rosemary Batt  and
Saul Rubinstein
Kirsten S. Wever
Affiliation:
Radcliffe Public Policy Institute
Rosemary Batt
Affiliation:
Cornell University
Saul Rubinstein
Affiliation:
Rutgers University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the United States, as in other advanced industrial countries, worker participation in management has taken on increasing importance, placing pressures on employers and unions to change how they deal with employees/members, and with each other. This paper examines two of the most impressive cases in the U.S.: the partnerships between General Motors (G.M.) and the United Autoworkers union (U.A.W.) at Saturn and between BellSouth and the Communication Workers union (C.W.A.). We outline the evolution and the basic features of these innovations, as well as highlighting certain ongoing problems. These problems, we argue, confront the parties to employment relations in the U.S. more generally, reflecting profound ambivalence about such experiments, and their continued isolation as ‘islands of excellence’. As such, these cases both illustrate the vast potential for labor-management partnerships as well as the dampening effect of the employment relations context in the U.S.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Economic and Labour Relations Review , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , June 1996 , pp. 67 - 87
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

A.F.L.-C.I.O. (1994) ‘The New American Workplace: A Labor Perspective,’ Washington D.C.: American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations.Google Scholar
A.F.L.-C.I.O. (1985) ‘The Changing Situation of Wokers and Their Unions,’ Washington D.C.: American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations.Google Scholar
Appiebaum, Eileen, Batt, Rosemary (1994) The New American Workplace: Transforming Work Systems in the United States, Ithaca, NY: ILR Press .Google Scholar
Batt, Rosemary (1995) ‘Performance and Welfare Effects of Work Restructuring: Evidence from Telecommunications Services,’ Ph.D. Dissertation, Sloan School of Management, M.I.T.Google Scholar
Campbell, Iain (1989) ‘New Production Concepts? The West German Debates on Restructuring,’ in Labour and Industry, Vol. 2, No. 2, June, pp. 247–280 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collective Bargaining Forum (1991) Labor-Management Commitment: A Compact for Change, Washington D.C., U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor-Management Cooperation Programs, B.L.M.R. 141.Google Scholar
Commission on the Future of Worker-Management Relations, (1994) Final Report, Washington D.C., U.S. Department of Labor ad U.S. Department of Commerce.Google Scholar
Craviso, Ralph (1993) Seminar on Airline Industrial Relations at the Sloan School of Management, M.I.T., February.Google Scholar
Eaton, Adrienne, Voos, Paula (1992) ‘Unions and Contemporary Innovations in Work Organization, Compensation and Employee Participation,’ in Mishel, Lawrence, Voos, Paula (eds), Unions and Economic Competitiveness, New York: M.E. Sharpe .Google Scholar
Frenkel, Steve, Korczynski, Marek, Donahue, Leigh, Shire, Karen (1995) ‘Re-Organising Work: New Directions in Theory and Research,’ Working Paper 048, Center for Corporate Change, Australian Graduate School of Management, University of New South Wales, Sydney Australia.Google Scholar
Gesamtmetall (1985) Mensch und Arbeit: Gemeinsame Interessen von Mitarbeitern und Unternehmen in einer sich wandelten Arbeitswett, Cologne, 1989.Google Scholar
Katz, Harry, Shifting Gears Changing Labor Relations in the U.S. Automobile Industry, Cambridge: M.I.T. Press .Google Scholar
Kelley, Maryellen, Harrison, Bennett (1991) ‘Unions, Technology and Labor-Management Cooperation,’ in Mishel, Lawrence, Voos, Paula (eds), Unions and Economic Competitiveness, New York: M.E. Sharpe .Google Scholar
Klein, Jan, Tom Chase, Compilers (1993) The Ecology of Work: The Role of Unions in New Work Systems, The Maritime Institute, Linthicum, MD, April.Google Scholar
Kochan, Thomas, Katz, Harry, McKersie, Robert (1986) The Transformation of American Industrial Relations, New York: Basic Books .Google Scholar
Kochan, Thomas A. (1995) ‘Using the Dunlop Commission Report to Achieve Mutual Gains’, in Industrial Relations, Vol. 34, No. 3, July, pp. 350–366 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDuffie, John Paul, Krafcik, John (1991) ‘Integrating Technology and Human Resources for High-Performance Manufacturing: Evidence from the International Auto Industry,’ in Kochan, Thomas, Useem, Michael (eds), Transforming Organizations, London: Oxford University Press .Google Scholar
McDonough, Paul S. (1990) ‘Labor Relations: Maintain a Union-Free Status,’ in Personnel Journal, April.Google Scholar
Mishel, Lawrence, Voos, Paula (eds) (1991) Unions and Economic Competitiveness, New York: M.E. Sharpe .Google Scholar
Nash, Peter G. (1991) Testimony on behalf of the National Association of Manufacturers before the Labor Subcommittee of the Committee on Human Resources, United States Senate, March 12.Google Scholar
Osterman, Paul (1994) ‘How Common is Workplace Transformation and How Can We Explain Who Adopts It?’ in Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 47, No. 2, pp. 173–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
J. D. Power Customer Satisfaction Index, 1992–1995.Google Scholar
Reynolds, Morgan O. (1990) ‘The Creative Destruction of Unionism,’ in Forum for Applied Research and Policy, Vol. 5, No. 4, Winter.Google Scholar
Rubinstein, Saul, Bennett, Michael, Kochan, Thomas (1993) ‘The Saturn Partnership: Co-Management and the Reinvention of the Local Union,’ in Kaufman, Bruce, Kleiner, Morris (eds), Employee Representation: Alternatives and Future Directions, Madison, WI: Industrial Relations Research Association.Google Scholar
Rubinstein, Saul, ‘The Saturn Partnership,’ Ph.D. Dissertation in progress, M.I.T., Sloan School of Management, forthcoming in 1996.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, Leonard, Heskett, James (1991) ‘The Service-Driven Service Company,’ in Harvard Business Review, September/October.Google Scholar
Visser, Jelle (1994) ‘Local and Global: Trade Unions in the Future,’ in Niland, John R., Lansbury, Russell D., Verevis, Chrissie (eds), The Future of Industrial Reactions: Global Change and Challenges, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Walton, Richard (1985) ‘From Control to Commitment at the Workplace,’ in Harvard Business Review, March/April.Google Scholar
Wever, Kirsten (1995) Negotiating Competitiveness: Employment Relations and Organizational Innovation in Germany and the United States, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Womack, James, Jones, Daniel, Roos, Daniel (1991) The Machine that Changed the World, New York: Rawson MacMillan.Google Scholar