Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T17:04:46.521Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Organisational support and safety management: A study of shipboard safety supervision

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

Conghua Xue  and
Lijun Tang
Conghua Xue*
Affiliation:
Nantong Shipping College, China
Lijun Tang
Affiliation:
University of Plymouth, UK
*
Conghua Xue, Faculty of Humanities and Arts, Nantong Shipping College, 185 Tongsheng Avenue, Economic and Technological Development District, Nantong 226010, Jiangsu, China. Email: xuech@ntsc.edu.cn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Shipping is a safety critical industry where operational errors may lead to maritime accidents involving property damage, loss of lives and environmental pollution. As part of the trend towards self-regulation, the International Maritime Organisation has adopted a worldwide International Safety Management Code which made ship managers responsible for workplace health and safety. This study, based on interviews in two Chinese shipping companies, examines how ship managers use ship visits to monitor shipboard safety management. Interviews with managers from company offices and crew members indicated that managerial ship visits mainly take the form of inspections that focus on low-trust surveillance and disciplinary action rather than genuine support, being based on the safe person rather than the more effective safe place approach. From the perspective of crew members, because the managers visited ships only occasionally, they were unlikely to have sound knowledge of the specific situations and work routines on their ships. Consequently, managers’ interventions for safety compliance were seen by crew members as failing to address real risk factors, and leading instead to increased workloads, psychological pressure and fatigue, the very antithesis of safety management. Meanwhile a coherent, supportive system for reducing risk remains underdeveloped in the shipping industry.

Keywords

J81J83L91M54N75Chinese chemical shippingISM Codeorganisational supportsafety managementsafety supervisionself-regulation
Type
Original Articles
Information
The Economic and Labour Relations Review , Volume 30 , Issue 4: Brexit Wellbeing and Safety , December 2019 , pp. 549 - 565
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bhattacharya, S (2009) The impact of the ISM Code on the management of occupational health and safety in the maritime industry. PhD Thesis, Cardiff University, Cardiff.Google Scholar
Bhattacharya, S (2011) Sociological factors influencing the practice of incident reporting: the case of the shipping industry. Employee Relations 34(1): 4–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhattacharya, S (2012) The effectiveness of the ISM Code: a qualitative enquiry. Marine Policy 36(2): 528–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhattacharya, S, Tang, L (2013a) Middle managers’ role in safeguarding OHS: the case of the shipping industry. Safety Science 51(1): 63–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhattacharya, S, Tang, L (2013b) Fatigued for safety? Supply chain occupational health and safety initiatives in shipping. Economic and Industrial Democracy 34(3): 383–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blau, PM (1964) Exchange & Power in Social Life. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Clarke, S, Ward, K (2006) The role of leader influence tactics and safety climate in engaging employee safety participation. Risk Analysis 26(5): 1175–1185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eisenberger, R, Huntington, R (1986) Perceived organisational support. Journal of Applied Psychology 71(3): 500–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenberger, R, Malone, GP, Presson, WD (2016) Optimizing Perceived Organizational Support to Enhance Employee Engagement. Society for Human Resource Management and Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Available at: www.shrm.org/hr-today/trends-and-forecasting/special-reports-and-expert-views/Documents/SHRM-SIOP%20Perceived%20Organizational%20Support.pdf (accessed 30 June 2019).Google Scholar
Ellis, N, Bloor, M, Sampson, H (2010) Patterns of seafarer injuries. Maritime Policy & Management 37(2): 121–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frick, K, Wren, J (2000) Reviewing occupational health and safety management – multiple roots, diverse perspectives and ambiguous outcomes. In: Frick, K, Jensen, PL, Quinlan, M, et al. (eds) Systematic Occupational Health and Safety Management: Perspectives on an International Development. Amsterdam; New York: Pergamon, pp. 17–42.Google Scholar
Gouldner, AW (1960) The norm of reciprocity: a preliminary statement. American Sociological Review 25: 161–178.Google Scholar
Gunningham, N (2008) Occupation health and safety, worker participation and the mining industry in a changing world of work. Economic and Industrial Democracy 29(3): 336–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunningham, N, Johnstone, R (2000) The legal construction of OHS management systems. In: Frick, K, Jensen, PL, Quinlan, M, et al (eds) Systematic Occupational Health and Safety Management: Perspectives on an International Development. Amsterdam; New York: Pergamon, pp. 125–148.Google Scholar
Hassel, M, Asbjornslett, BE, Hole, LP (2011) Underreporting of maritime accidents to vessel accident databases. Accident Analysis & Prevention 43(6): 2053–2063.Google ScholarPubMed
Hofmann, DA, Morgeson, FP (1999) Safety-related behavior as a social exchange: the role of perceived organizational support and leader–member exchange. Journal of Applied Psychology 84(2): 286–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inness, M, Turner, N, Barling, J, et al. (2010) Transformational leadership and employee safety performance: a within-person, between-jobs design. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology 15(3): 279–290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iversen, R (2012) The mental health of seafarers. International Maritime Health 63: 78–79.Google ScholarPubMed
Kokotos, DX (2013) A study of shipping accidents validates the effectiveness of ISM-Code. European Scientific Journal 9(19): 387–392.Google Scholar
Kurtessis, JN, Eisenberger, R, Ford, MT, et al. (2017) Perceived organizational support: a meta-analytic evaluation of organizational support theory. Journal of Management 43(6): 1854–1884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lappalainen, J, Vepsalainen, A, Salmi, K, et al. (2011) Incident reporting in Finnish shipping companies. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs 10(2): 167–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, H (1965) Reciprocation: the relationship between man and organization. Administrative Science Quarterly 9: 370–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, M, Shin, SH (2019) Half-century research developments in maritime accidents: future directions. Accident Analysis and Prevention 123: 448–460.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mearns, KJ, Reader, T (2008) Organisational support and safety outcomes: an un-investigated relationship? Safety Science 46(3): 388–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neal, A, Griffin, MA, Hart, PM (2000) The impact of organizational climate on safety climate and individual behavior. Safety Science 34(1–3): 99–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Donnell, M, Ananda, KL, Jayawardana, AKL, et al. (2012) Organisational support and employee commitment in Sri Lanka. The Economic and Labour Relations Review 23(1): 125–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oltedal, HA, McArthur, DP (2011) Reporting practices in merchant shipping, and the identification of influencing factors. Safety Science 49(2): 331–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pantouvakis, A, Karakasnaki, M (2016) An empirical assessment of ISM Code effectiveness on performance: the role of ISO certification. Maritime Policy & Management 43(7): 874–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pantouvakis, A, Karakasnaki, M (2018) The human talent and its role in ISM Code effectiveness and competitiveness in the shipping industry. Maritime Policy & Management 2018(2): 1–16.Google Scholar
Psarros, G, Skjong, R, Eide, MS (2010) Under-reporting of maritime accidents. Accident Analysis & Prevention 42(2): 619–625.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reason, J (2000) Human error: models and management. British Medical Journal 320(7237): 768–770.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sampson, H, Acejo, I, Ellis, N, et al. (2016) The relationships between seafarers and shore-side personnel: an outline report based on research undertaken in the period 2012-2016. Available at: www.sirc.cf.ac.uk/Uploads/Publications/The%20relationships%20between%20seafarers%20and%20shore-side%20personnel.pdf (accessed 30 June 2019).Google Scholar
Sampson, H, Turgo, N, Acejo, I, et al. (2019) ‘Between a rock and a hard place’: the implications of lost autonomy and trust for professionals at sea. Work, Employment and Society 33: 648–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tang, L, Bhattacharya, S (2018) Beyond the management–employee dyad: supply chain initiatives in shipping. Industrial Relations Journal 49(3): 196–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tzannatos, E, Kokotos, D (2009) Analysis of accidents in Greek shipping during the pre-and post-ISM period. Marine Policy 33(4): 679–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walters, D, Bailey, N (2013) Lives in Peril: Profit or Safety in the Global Maritime Industry? Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wokutch, RE, VanSandt, CV (2000) OHS management in the United States and Japan: the DuPont and the Toyota models. In: Frick, K, Jensen, PL, Quinlan, M, et al (eds) Systematic Occupational Health and Safety Management: Perspectives on an International Developmen t. Amsterdam; New York: Pergamon, pp. 367–387.Google Scholar
Xue, C, Tang, L, Walters, D (2017) Who is dominant? Occupational Health and Safety management in Chinese shipping. Journal of Industrial Relations 59(1): 65–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xue, C, Tang, L, Walters, D (2018) Decoupled implementation? Incident reporting in Chinese shipping. Economic and Industrial Democracy. Epub ahead of print 7 March 2018. DOI: 10.1177/0143831X18758175.Google Scholar
Xue, C, Tang, L, Walters, D (2019) Occupational health and safety indicators and under-reporting: case studies in Chinese shipping. Relations Industrielles/Industrial Relations 74(1): 141–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zohar, D (2010) Thirty years of safety climate research: reflections and future directions. Accident Analysis and Prevention 42: 1517–1522.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed