Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-26T17:48:26.412Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Work Choices in Overview: Big Bang or Slow Burn?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

Andrew Stewart
Andrew Stewart*
Affiliation:
School of Law, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA, 5001
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Work Choices legislation represents a concerted attempt to tilt the balance of labour regulation in favour of employers. It does this by allowing them to offer agreements that reduce or eliminate award or statutory entitlements, by making it harder for both workers and unions to contest management decisions, and by sidelining the Australian Industrial Relations Commission. It also seeks to ‘move towards’ a national system of regulation by providing that the majority of employers will be exclusively subject to federal rather than State regulation, at least for some purposes. Yet for all the radical nature of many of the changes, this is not the ‘big bang’ it might have been. Many features of the old arbitration system have been retained and there are genuine compromises at the heart of some of the changes. It also remains to be seen just how quickly employers will move to exploit the opportunities the new legislation offers, given its complexity, opposition from unions, and indeed the natural pragmatism or conservatism of many managers — and whether this will prompt further intervention by a government that appears uncomfortable with leaving it to employers to make their own choices.

Type
Work Choices: A Critical Analysis
Information
The Economic and Labour Relations Review , Volume 16 , Issue 2: Work Choices: A Critical Analysis , May 2006 , pp. 25 - 60
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Parts of this article have previously been published on the Federation Press website (http://www.federationpress.com.au) as a Supplement to Creighton and Stewart's Labour Law.

References

ACCI (Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry) (2002) Modern Workplace: Modern Future — A Blueprint for the Australian Workplace Relations System 2002–2010, ACCI, Melbourne.Google Scholar
AMMA (Australian Mines and Metals Association) (2000) A Model of Internal Regulation of Workplace Employee Relations, AMMA, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Australian Government (2005) WorkChoices: A New Workplace Relations System, Commonwealth, Canberra.Google Scholar
Award Review Taskforce (2005a) Award Rationalisation, Award Review Taskforce Discussion Paper, Canberra.Google Scholar
Award Review Taskforce (2005b) Rationalisation of Award Wage and Classification Structures, Award Review Taskforce Discussion Paper, Canberra.Google Scholar
Baird, M. (2004) ‘Orientations to Paid Maternity Leave: Understanding the Australian Debate’, Journal of Industrial Relations, 46 (3): 259–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bray, M. and Waring, P. (2005) ‘“Complexity” and “Congruence” in Australian Labour Regulation’, Journal of Industrial Relations, 47 (1): 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briggs, C. (2005) Federal IR Reform: The Shape of Things to Come, ACIRRT, University of Sydney.Google Scholar
Buchanan, J. and Callus, R. (1993) ‘Efficiency and Equity at Work: The Need for Labour Market Regu-lation in Australia’, Journal of Industrial Relations, 35 (4): 515–537.Google Scholar
Callus, R. (2005) ‘The Re-Regulation of Australian Industrial Relations: The Role of the Hancock Inquiry,’ in Isaac, J. and Lansbury, R.D. (Eds), Labour Market Deregulation: Rewriting the Rules, Federation Press, Sydney, pp. 111–121.Google Scholar
CEACR (Committee of Experts on the Application of Conventions and Recommendations) (2004) Individual Observation concerning Convention No. 87, Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise, 1948 — Australia, ILO, Geneva.Google Scholar
CEACR (2005) Individual Observation concerning Convention No. 98, Right to Organise and Collective Bargaining, 1949 — Australia, ILO, Geneva.Google Scholar
Creighton, B. and Stewart, A. (2005) Labour Law, 4th ed., Federation Press, Sydney.Google Scholar
DEWR (Department of Employment and Workplace Relations) (2005) Discussion Paper: Proposals for Legislative Reforms in Independent Contracting and Labour Hire (DEWR, Canberra).Google Scholar
Ellem, B., Baird, M., Cooper, R. and Lansbury, R. (2005) ‘“WorkChoices”: Myth-Making at Work’, Journal of Australian Political Economy, 56: 13–31.Google Scholar
Evans, R. (2005) ‘President's Report,’ HR Nicholls Society AGM, [Online], Available: http://www.hrnicholls.com.au [accessed 5 December 2005].Google Scholar
Fetter, J. and Mitchell, R. (2004) ‘The Legal Complexity of Workplace Regulation and its Impact upon Functional Flexibility in Australian Workplaces’, Aust-ralian Journal of Labour Law, 17 (3): 276–305.Google Scholar
Forbes-Mewett, H., Griffin, G and McKenzie, D. (2003) ‘The Australian Industrial Relations Commission: Adapting or Dying?’, International Journal of Employment Studies, 11 (2): 1–23.Google Scholar
Ford, W.J. (2005) ‘Politics, the Constitution and Australian Industrial Relations: Pursuing a Unified National System’, Australian Economic Review, 38 (2): 211–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freyens, B. and Oslington, P. (2005) ‘The Likely Employment Impact of Removing Unfair Dismissal Protection’, Journal of Australian Political Economy, 56: 56–65.Google Scholar
Gray, A. (2005) ‘Precedent and Policy: Australian Industrial Relations Reform in the 21st Century Using the Corporations Power’, Deakin Law Review, 10: 440–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
House of Representatives Standing Committee on Employment, Workplace Relations and Workforce Participation (2005) Making it Work: Inquiry into Independent Contracting and Labour Hire Arrangements, Commonwealth, Canberra.Google Scholar
Howe, J. (2005) ‘“Deregulation” of Labour Relations in Australia: Towards Command and Control,’ Working Paper No. 34, Centre for Employment and Labour Relations Law, University of Melbourne.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, M. (2005) ‘WorkChoices, The Demise of the State Systems and the Future for Working Life in Queensland’, Journal of Australian Political Economy, 56: 207–223.Google Scholar
McCallum, R. (2005) ‘The Australian Constitution and the Shaping of Our Federal and State Labour Laws’, Deakin Law Review, 10: 460–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCrystal, S. (2006) ‘Regulating Collective Rights in Bargaining: Employees, Self-Employed Persons and Small Businesses’ In Arup, C. , Gahan, P. , Howe, J. , Johnstone, R. , Mitchell, R. and O'Donnell, A. (eds), Labour Law and Labour Market Regulation, Federation Press, Sydney (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Mitchell, R., Campbell, R., Barnes, A., Bicknell, E., Creighton, K., Fetter, J. and Korman, S. (2005) ‘What's Going on with the “No Disadvantage Test”? An Analysis of Outcomes and Processes Under the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cwlth)’, Journal of Industrial Relations, 47 (4): 393–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, R. and Fetter, J. (2003) ‘Human Resource Management and Individualisation in Aust-ralian Labour Law’, Journal of Industrial Relations, 45 (3): 292–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, D. (2005) ‘“Work Choices” (Sic): Less Flexible, More Complicated and Still Unfair’, Address to Australian Liberal Students Federation Conference, [Online], Available: http://http://www.ipe.net.au/Work%20choice.html Hyperlink reference not valid. [accessed on 3 December 2005].Google Scholar
Peetz, D. (2006) Brave New Workplace: How Individual Contracts are Changing Our Jobs, Allen & Unwin, Sydney.Google Scholar
Pocock, B. (2003) The Work/Life Collision, Federation Press, Sydney.Google Scholar
Productivity Commission (2005) Review of National Competition Policy Reforms, Inquiry Report No. 33, Productivity Commission, Canberra.Google Scholar
Queensland Department of Industrial Relations (2005) Estimating the Coverage of a New Industrial Relations System, DIR, Brisbane (available on request from the Department).Google Scholar
Rider, C. (2005) ‘Using Tax and Social Security to Reconstruct the Part-Time Labour Market: A Note on “Welfare to Work’”, Australian Journal of Labour Law, 18 (3): 302–312.Google Scholar
Riley, J. (2005) Employee Protection at Common Law, Federation Press, Sydney.Google Scholar
Robbins, W. and Voll, G. (2005) ‘The Case for Unfair Dismissal Reform: A Review of the Evidence’, Australian Bulletin of Labour, 31 (3): 237–254.Google Scholar
Senate Employment, Workplace Relations and Education References Committee (2005) Workplace Agreements, Parliament, Canberra.Google Scholar
Stewart, A. (2001) ‘Federal Labour Law and New Uses for the Corporations Power’, Australian Journal of Labour Law, 14 (2): 145–168.Google Scholar
Stewart, A. (2002) ‘Redefining Employment? Meet-ing the Challenge of Contract and Agency Labour’, Australian Journal of Labour Law, 15 (3): 235–276.Google Scholar
Stewart, A. (2005) ‘A Simple Plan for Reform? The Problem of Complexity in Workplace Regulation’, Australian Bulletin of Labour, 31 (3): 210–236.Google Scholar
Stewart, A. (2006) ‘Labour Market Reform in a Federal System: Making the Best of a Flawed Framework’ in Productive Reform in a Federal System, Productivity Commission, Canberra.Google Scholar