Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-wxhwt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T01:46:38.593Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Near-field coupling model between PCB and grounded transmission line based on plane wave spectrum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2013

Christelle Leseigneur ,
David Baudry ,
Blaise Ravelo  and
Anne Louis
Christelle Leseigneur
Affiliation:
IRSEEM, EA 4353 - ESIGELEC, av. Galilée, BP 10024, 76801 St Etienne du Rouvray Cedex, France
David Baudry
Affiliation:
CESI, IRISE Laboratory, 1 rue marconi, 76130 Mont Saint Aignan, France
Blaise Ravelo*
Affiliation:
IRSEEM, EA 4353 - ESIGELEC, av. Galilée, BP 10024, 76801 St Etienne du Rouvray Cedex, France
Anne Louis
Affiliation:
CESI, IRISE Laboratory, 1 rue marconi, 76130 Mont Saint Aignan, France
*
a e-mail: blaise.ravelo@yahoo.fr
Get access

Abstract

This article presents an explicit model of electromagnetic (EM) coupling between electronic circuits and metallic wire placed above the ground plane. The model is based on the interaction between the EM near-field (NF) that has been treated with plane wave spectrum (PWS) and the Taylor model. The routine process illustrating the methodology is addressed is this article. The practicability of the model developed was upheld with different analytical and real demonstrators. First, the NF coupling between a straight transmission line (TL) and 1 GHz Wilkinson power divider (PWD) designed and implemented in planar technology was provided. Subsequently, simulations with a powerful commercial tool and measurements from 0.2 GHz to 2 GHz revealed a good agreement between the coupling voltages from the proposed model. As a second proof of concept, a printed circuit board incorporating a 40 MHz RF oscillator was placed 5 mm above the grounded TL. Once again, coupling voltages matched measurements were observed with magnitude relative difference lower than 5 dB. The hereby model presents huge benefits not only in terms of flexibility in the design process but it can also be run with very less computation time compared to the existing standard simulators. The model can be potentially a good candidate for investigating complex systems EMC engineering.

Type
Research Article
Information
The European Physical Journal - Applied Physics , Volume 64 , Issue 1 , October 2013 , 11001
Copyright
© EDP Sciences, 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Wang, Y., Zhong, Z., Ooi, B.L., in Proc. of Asia-Pacific Symp. EMC and 19th Int. Zurich Symp. EMC, 2008 (APEMC, Singapore, 2008), pp. 786–789Google Scholar
Gray, R.I., IEEE Trans. EMC 10G, 253 (1968)
Pelton, E., Burnside, W., Wang, N., in Proc. of 1978 Ant. Prop. Society Int. Symp., vol. 16 (Redondo Beach, CA, USA, 1978), pp. 81–84Google Scholar
Sarma, A.D., Murthy Sarma, N.S., in Proc. of Int. Conf. Electromagnetic Interference and Compatibility’97, Hyderabad, India 1997 pp. 167–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladkin, P.B., EM Interference with Aircraft Systems: why worry? RVS-J-97-03, 13 July 1997Google Scholar
RTCA DO-160E, Environmental conditions and test procedures for airborne equipment, RTCA Inc., 2004
Mee, S.W., Ranganathan, S., Taylor, R., in Proc. of 2005 Int. Symp. EMC, vol. 3 (EMC, Chicago, Illinois, USA, 2005), pp. 744–749Google Scholar
Mainville, S., in Proc. of IEEE Int. Symp. EMC (Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA, 2010), pp. 620–624Google Scholar
Egot, S., Baranowski, S., Klingler, M., in Proc. of 7th EMC Europe Int. Symp. EMC (EMC Europe 2006), Barcelona, Spain 2006, pp. 1041–1045
Kasuga, T., Tanaka, M., Komakine, T., Inoue, H., in Proc. of IEEE Int. Symp. EMC, 2000, vol. 1 (Washington, DC, 2000), pp. 369–374Google Scholar
Ariga, Z., Wada, K., in Proc. of 2009 Int. Conf. Power Electronics, Drive Systems (PEDS 2009), Taipei, TW, China, 2009, pp. 1014–1019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Youssef, M., Roudet, J., Marechal, Y., in Proc. of 28th Annual IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conf., 1997 (PESC’97) Record, vol. 2 (St. Louis, MO, USA, 1997), pp. 1529–1534Google Scholar
De Daran, F., Chollet-Ricard, J., Lafon, F., Maurice, O., in Proc. of IEEE Symp. EMC, vol. 1 (Istanbul, Turkey, 2003), pp. 479–482Google Scholar
Vives, Y., Arcambal, C., Louis, A., de Daran, F., Eudeline, P., Mazari, B., IEEE Trans. EMC 49, 391 (2007)
Fernández-López, P., Arcambal, C., Baudry, D., Verdeyme, S., Mazari, B., in Proc. of 7th Int. Workshop on EMC of Integrated Circuits (EMC Compo’09), Toulouse, France, 2009
Tong, X., Thomas, D.W.P., Biwojno, K., Nothofer, A., Sewell, P., Christopoulos, C., in Proc. of the 39th European Microwave Conf. (EuMC 2009), Rome, Italy, 2009, pp. 280–283
Serhir, M., Besnier, P., Drissi, M., IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 56, 48 (2008)CrossRef
Kanda, M., IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 41, 1349 (1993)CrossRef
Bouchelouk, L., Riah, Z., Baudry, D., Kadi, M., Louis, A., Mazari, B., Int. J. RF and Microwave Computer-Aided Engineering 18, 146 (2008)CrossRef
Baudry, D., Louis, A., Mazari, B., Progress Electromagn. Res. 60, 311 (2006)CrossRef
Baudry, D., Arcambal, C., Louis, A., Mazari, B., Eudeline, P., IEEE Trans. EMC 49, 485 (2007)
Becherer, M., Kiermaier, J., Csaba, G., Rezgani, J., Yilmaz, C., Osswald, P., Lugli, P., Schmitt-Landsiedel, D., in Proc. of 2009 European, Solid State Device Research Conf. (ESSDERC’09), Athens, Greece, 2009, pp. 105–108CrossRef
Ney, M., IEEE Trans. Microwave Theor. Tech. 33, 972 (1985)CrossRef
Gibson, W.C., The Method of Moments in Electromagnetics, 1st edn. (Taylor & Francis, Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuster, J., Luebbers, R., Riazi, H., in Digest, Ant. Prop. Society Int. Symp., AP-S, 1996, vol. 1 (Baltimore, MD, USA, 1996), pp. 426–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiao, D., Lu, M., Michielssen, E., Jin, J., IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 49, 1453 (2001)CrossRef
Hoefer, W.J.R., IEEE Trans. Microwave Theor. Tech. 33, 882 (1985)CrossRef
Saguet, P., Int. J. Numer. Model. 2, 191 (1989)CrossRef
Jin, J., The Finite Element Method in Electromagnetics (John Wiley & Sons, New York, USA, 1993)Google Scholar
Garrett, J., Ruehli, A., Paul, C., in Proc. of 1993 IEEE Int. Symp. EMC, Dallas, TX, USA, 1993, pp. 28–32
Xie, H., Wang, J., Fan, R., Liu, Y., Progress Electromagn. Res. 103, 241 (2010)CrossRef
Cheney, W., Kincaid, D., Numerical Analysis: Mathematics of Scientific Computing (Brooks/Cole Publishing Co., New York, 1996)Google Scholar
CST Microwave Studio 2012. http://www.cst.com
ADS 2011.10, Agilent Technologies. http://www.home.agilent.com/en/pd-1835794/ads-2011-product-release?&cc=FR&lc=fre
ANSYS HFSS Version 14. http://www.ansys.com/Products/Simulation+Technology/Electromagnetics/High-Performance+Electronic+Design/ANSYS+HFSS
Numerical Electromagnics Code. http://www.nec2.org/
FEKO 2012. http://www.feko.info/
Jauregui, R., Riu, P.I., Silva, F., Proc. of IEEE Int. Symp. EMC, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA, 2010, pp. 257–262Google Scholar
Edwards, R.S., Marvin, A.C., Porter, S.J., IEEE Trans. EMC 52, 155 (2010)
Rostamzadeh, C., Archambeault, B., IEEE Trans. EMC 1, 79 (2006)
Montrose, M.I., Printed Circuit Board Design Techniques for EMC Compliance: A Handbook for Designers, 2nd edn. (Wiley-IEEE Press, New York, USA, 2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archambeault, B.R., Brench, C., Connor, S., IEEE Trans. EMC 52, 455 (2010)
Egot, S., Klingler, M., Kone, L., Baranowski, S., Demoulin, B., in Proc. of 16th Int. Zurich Symp. EMC, Zurich, Switzerland, 2005, pp. 125–130Google Scholar
Taylor, C.D., Sattewhite, R.S., Harrison, C.W., IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. E, 987 (1965)CrossRef
Agrawal, A.K., Price, H.J., IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 18, 432 (1980)
Rachidi, F., IEEE Trans. EMC 35, 404 (1993)
Rachidi, F., Tkatchenko, S., Ianoz, M., IEEE Trans. EMC 37, 509 (1995)
Leseigneur, C., Kröning, O., Fernández López, P., Baudry, D., Louis, A., Leone, M., in Proc. of 7th Int. Workshop on EMC of Integrated Circuits (EMC Compo’09), Toulouse, France, 2009
Leseigneur, C., Fernandez-Lopez, P., Arcambal, C., Baudry, D., Louis, A., in Proc. of IEEE Int. Symp. EMC, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA, 2010, pp. 22–27Google Scholar
Shi, J., Cracraft, M.A., Slattery, K.P., Yamaguchi, M., DuBroff, R.E., IEEE Trans. EMC 47, 642 (2005)
Gregson, S., McCormick, J., Parini, C., IET Electromagnetic Waves Series 53, The IET, Michael Faraday House, London, UK, 2007Google Scholar
Rudduck, R.C., Wu, D.C.F., Intihar, M.R., IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 21, 231 (1973)CrossRef
Ravelo, B., Riah, Z., Baudry, D., Mazari, B., Eur. Phys. J. Appl. Phys. 53, 11201 (2011)CrossRef
Baudry, D., Kadi, M., Arcambal, C., Riah, Z., Vives, Y., Louis, A., Mazari, B., IET Sci. Meas. Technol. 3, 72 (2009)CrossRef
Ravelo, B., Liu, Y., Slama, J.B.H., Eur. Phys. J. Appl. Phys. 53, 30701 (2011)CrossRef
Polyanin, A.D., Handbook of Linear Partial Differential Equations for Engineers and Scientists (Chapman & Hall/CRC Press LLC, Clearance Center Danvers, MA, USA, 2002)Google Scholar
Paul, C.R., Analysis of Multiconductor Transmission Lines, Wiley-Interscience, 2nd edn. (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey, 2007), p. 127Google Scholar