Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-wxhwt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T00:41:10.617Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Using Diatoms as Ecological and Paleoecological Indicators in Riverine Environments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2017

Jeffery R. Stone
Jeffery R. Stone*
Affiliation:
Department of Geosciences University of Nebraska-Lincoln 214 Bessey Hall Lincoln, Nebraska, 68506-0430
Get access

Abstract

Fossil diatom assemblages are useful for reconstructing past environmental changes in riverine systems. However, few studies have attempted to utilize paleolimnological techniques in these settings. Analysis of sediments from riverine environments can provide key information predating the impact of human development, which cannot be acquired by other means. Paleolimnological techniques can be used to determine the natural variability in these systems and to estimate the magnitude and rates of change that the environment may have undergone as a result of anthropogenic or climatic factors, and to provide realistic goals for management of negatively-impacted systems.

Reconstructing past riverine settings requires an understanding of the factors that control the spatial distribution of diatoms in riverine settings; this paper discusses the impact of resources, stressors, and disturbance events, which are the primary controls on the distribution of benthic diatoms in modern riverine environments. A selection of case studies that utilize paleolimnological techniques to infer past stream hydrology are also discussed; these examples encompass the use of fossil diatom assemblages from sediments recovered from lowland floodplain and meandering river systems, estuarine environments, fluvial lakes, arctic deltaic environments, and terminal lakes.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Paleontological Society Papers , Volume 13: Pond Scum to Carbon Sink: Geological and Environmental Applications of the Diatoms , October 2007 , pp. 121 - 130
Copyright
Copyright © by the Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amoros, C., and Van Urk, G. 1989. Palaeoecological analyses of large rivers: some principles and methods, pp. 143–165. In Petts, G. E., Möller, H., and Roux, A. L. (eds.) Historical Change of Large Alluvial Rivers: Western Europe. John Wiley and Sons, New York, New York.Google Scholar
Antoine, S. E., and Benson-Evans, K. 1982. The effect of current velocity on the rate of growth of benthic algal communites: Internationale Revue der gesamten Hydrobiologie und Hydrographie, 67:575–583.Google Scholar
Bahnwart, M., Hübener, T., and Schubert, H. 1999. Downstream changes in phytoplankton composition and biomass in a lowland river-lake system (Warnow River, Germany): Hydrobiologia, 391:99–111.Google Scholar
Biggs, B. J. F. 1996. Patterns in benthic algae of streams, pp. 31–56. In Stevenson, R. J., Bothwell, M. L., and Lowe, R. L. (eds.) Algal Ecology: Freshwater Benthic Systems. Academic Press: San Diego, California.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradbury, J. P. 1987. Late Holocene diatom paleolimnology of Walker Lake, Nevada: Archiv für Hydrobiologia Supplement Band, 79:1–27.Google Scholar
Carvajal-Chitty, H. I. 1993. Some notes about the Intermediate Disturbance Hypothesis and its effects on the phytoplankton of the middle Orinoco river: Hydrobiologia, 249:117–124.Google Scholar
Cox, E. J. 1990a. Studies of the algae of a small softwater stream I. Occurrence and distribution with particular reference to the diatoms: Archiv für Hydrobiologie Supplement Band, 83:525–552.Google Scholar
Cox, E. J. 1990b. Studies of the algae of a small softwater stream II. Algal standing crop (measured by chlorophyll-a) on soft and hard substrata: Archiv für Hydrobiologie Supplement Band, 83:553–566.Google Scholar
Cox, E. J. 1990c. Studies of the algae of a small softwater stream III. Interaction between discharge, sediment composition and diatom flora: Archiv für Hydrobiologie Supplement Band, 83:567–584.Google Scholar
Deseve, M. A., and Goldstein, M. E. 1981. The structure and composition of epilithic diatom communities of the St. Lawrence and Ottawa rivers in the Montreal area: Canadian Journal of Botany, 59:377–387.Google Scholar
Douglas, B. 1958. The ecology of the attached diatoms and other algae in a small stony stream: Journal of Ecology, 46:295–322.Google Scholar
Fritz, S. C. 1996. Paleolimnological records of climatic change in North America: Limnology and Oceanography, 41:882–889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, G. P. 1980. Temporal and spatial scales in phytoplankton ecology: Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 37:877–900.Google Scholar
Hay, M. B., Smol, J. P., Pipke, K. J., and Lesack, L. F. W. 1997. A diatom-based paleohydrological model for the Mackenzie Delta, Northwest Territories, Canada: Arctic and Alpine Research, 29:430–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphrey, K. P., and Stevenson, R. J. 1992. Responses of benthic algae to pulses in current and nutrients during simulations of subscouring spates: Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 11:37–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juggins, S. 1992. Diatoms in the Thames Estuary, England: Ecology, Palaeoecology, and Salinity Transfer Function, pp. 1–216. In Lange-Bertalot, H. (ed.) Bibliotheca Diatomologica Band 25. J. Cramer: Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
Jurasz, W., and Amoros, C. 1991. Ecological succession in a former meander of the Rhone River, France, reconstructed by Cladocera remains: Journal of Paleolimnology, 6:113–122.Google Scholar
Köhler, J., and Nixdorf, B. 1994. Influences of the lowland river Spree on phytoplankton dynamics in the flow-through Lake Müggelsee (Germany): Hydrobiologia, 275/276:187–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ludlam, S. D., Feeney, S., and Douglas, M. S. V. 1996. Changes in the importance of lotic and littoral diatoms in a high arctic lake over the last 191 years: Journal of Paleolimnology, 16:187–204.Google Scholar
Maddock, I. 1999. The importance of physical habitat assessment for evaluating river health: Freshwater Biology, 41:373–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michelutti, N., Hay, M. B., Marsh, P., Lesack, L., and Smol, J. P. 2001. Diatom changes in lake sediments from the Mackenzie Delta, N.W.T., Canada: paleohydrological applications: Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research, 33:1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moss, B., and Balls, H. 1989. Phytoplankton distribution in a floodplain lake and river system. II. Seasonal changes in the phytoplankton communities and their control by hydrology and nutrient availability: Journal of Plankton Research, 11:839–867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulholland, P. J. 1996. Role in nutrient cycling in streams pp. 609–633. In Stevenson, R. J., Bothwell, M. L., and Lowe, R. L. (eds.) Algal Ecology: Freshwater Benthic Systems. Academic Press: San Diego, California.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munteanu, N., and Maly, E. J. 1981. The effect of current on the distribution of diatoms settling on submerged glass slides: Hydrobiologia, 78:272–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, C. G., and Stevenson, R. J. 1992. Resistance and resilience of lotic algal communities: importance of disturbance timing and current: Ecology, 73:1445–1461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, C. G. 1996. Response of benthic algal communities to natural physical disturbance, pp. 375–402. In Stevenson, R. J., Bothwell, M. L., and Lowe, R. L. (eds.) Algal Ecology: Freshwater Benthic Systems. Academic Press: San Diego, California.Google Scholar
Petts, G. E. 1989. Historical analysis of fluvial hydrosystems, pp. 1–18. In Petts, G.E., Möller, H., and Roux, A. L. (eds.) Historical Change of Large Alluvial Rivers: Western Europe. John Wiley and Sons, New York, New York.Google Scholar
Potapova, M. G., and Charles, D. F. 2002. Benthic diatoms in USA rivers: distribution along spatial and environmental gradients: Journal of Biogeography, 29:167–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reavie, E. D., and Smol, J. P. 1998. Epilithic diatoms of the St. Lawrence River and their relationship to water quality: Canadian Journal of Botany, 76:251–257.Google Scholar
Reavie, E. D., Smol, J. P., Carignan, R., and Lorrain, S. 1998. Diatom paleolimnology of two fluvial lakes in the St. Lawrence River: a reconstruction of environmental changes during the last centry: Journal of Phycology, 34:446–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, S., Sabater, S., and Beardall, J. 2004. Benthic microalgal colonization in streams of differing riparian cover and light availability: Journal of Phycology, 40: 1004–1012.Google Scholar
Stevenson, R. J. 1990. Benthic algal community dynamics in a stream during and after a spate: Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 9:277–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, R. J. 1996. An introduction to algal ecology in freshwater benthic habitats, pp. 3–30. In Stevenson, R. J., Bothwell, M. L., and Lowe, R. L. (eds.) Algal Ecology: Freshwater Benthic Systems. Academic Press: San Diego, California.Google Scholar
Stevenson, R. J. 1997. Scale-dependent determinants and consequences of benthic algal heterogeneity: Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 16:248–262.Google Scholar
Stevenson, R. J., and Pan, Y. 1999. Assessing environmental conditions in rivers and streams with diatoms, pp. 11–40. In Stoermer, E. F. and Smol, J. P. (eds.) The Diatoms: Applications for the Environmental and Earth Sciences. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thoms, M. C., Ogden, R. W., and Reid, M. A. 1999. Establishing the condition of lowland floodplain rivers: a palaeoecological approach: Freshwater Biology, 41:407–423.Google Scholar
Van Den Brink, F. W. B., Van Katwijk, M. M., and Van Der Velde, G. 1999. Impact of hydrology on phyto- and zooplankton community composition in floodplain lakes along the Lower Rhine and Meuse: Journal of Plankton Research, 16:351–373.Google Scholar
Vannote, R.L., Minshall, G.W., Cummins, K. W., Sedell, J.R., and Cushing, C.E. 1980. The River continuum Concept. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 37:130–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendker, S. 1992. Influence of current velocity on diatoms of a small softwater stream: Diatom Research, 7:387–396.Google Scholar
Yang, J., Basu, B. K., Hamilton, P. B., and Pick, F. R. 1997. The development of a true riverine phytoplankton assemblage along a lake-fed lowland river: Archiv für Hydrobiologia, 140:243–260.Google Scholar