No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Strindberg's A Dream Play: Postmodernist Visions on the Modernist Stage
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 July 2009
Extract
Since the 1980s, new approaches to theatre historiography, the study of what Sue-Ellen Case has called the “convergence of history and theory,” have begun to arise in a challenge to generally accepted principles of theatre history, such as the supremacy of independent facts, the autonomy of dramatic texts, and the hierarchy of text, performance, and culture. The French critic and philosopher Michel Foucault has pointed out that the grouping and ordering of events into historical periods creates a “space of reference,” which lends some events a heightened meaning, while obscuring or submerging others. In a substantial challenge to traditional methods of theatre history, historiographers influenced by this view have begun to examine the theoretical underpinnings of historical periodization. In theatre theory, Thomas Postlewait has investigated the often unarticulated assumptions by which theatre historians isolate a group of historical events and designate them with period names.Many scholars now center their attention on historical discontinuity: searching for ruptures in the historical narrative, focusing on dynamics which lend instability rather than stability to historical periods, and reconceptualizing temporal historical narratives into spatial relationships. For example, from a perspective of discontinuity, a play is conceived not simply as a fixed entity created at some moment in history, but as a representation of layers of historical influences; likewise, a theatre building is not simply a material location in space, but a physical expression of historically emergent architectural styles and sociopolitical circumstances, and a performance is not simply a translation of a text to the stage, but a collage of past and emergent cultural and aesthetic processes.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society for Theatre Research 1999
References
1. Foucault, Michel, Power/Knowledge, ed. Gordon, Colin (New York: Pantheon Books, 1980), 68Google Scholar.
2. Postlewait, Thomas, “The Criteria for Periodization in Theatre History,” Theatre Journal 40.3 (1988): 299–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
3. Bank, Rosemarie, “The Theatre Historian in the Mirror: Transformation in the Space of Representation,” Journal of Dramatic Theory and Criticism 3.2 (1989): 222Google Scholar.
4. For example, several historians have acknowledged the problematic presence of three generations of actors on the German stage at the beginning of the Weimar Republic. Pfeiffer, Herbert, Berlin. Zwanziger Jahre (Berlin: Rembrandt, 1961)Google Scholar and Rühle, Günther, Theater für die Republik 1917–7933 im Spiegel der Kritik (Frankfurt: Fischer, 1967), 17Google Scholar.
5. See, for example, Patterson, Michael, The Revolution in the German Theatre 1900–1933 (Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1981Google Scholar, Willett, John, The Theatre of the Weimar Republic (New York: Holmes and Meyer, 1988)Google Scholar, and Rühle, Theater. Although Rühle acknowledges the importance of Strindberg's influence on the German theatre between 1917 and 1923, his extensive anthology of performance reviews omits a number of significant Strindberg productions before 1917.
6. Peter Szondi's book on modern drama, which has only recently been translated into English, has analyzed the development of epic drama in the work of Strindberg and other tum-of-the-century playwrights. Szondi, Peter, Theory of the Modern Drama, trans. Hays, Michael (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1987)Google Scholar. For a specific analysis of Strindberg's contribution to the epic theatre see Paul, Fritz, August Strindberg (Stuttgart: Metzler, 1979), 91CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
7. Recent books of feminist criticism such as Sue-Ellen, Case's Feminism and the Theatre (New York: Routledge, 1988)Google Scholar, her Performing Feminisms: Critical Theory and Theatre (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1990)Google Scholar and the section on feminism in Reinelt's, Janelle and Roach's, JosephCritical Theory and Performance (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1992) do not consider StrindbergGoogle Scholar. With the exception of Bertolt Brecht, who serves feminist critics with strategies for their own political and artistic endeavors, modernist writers, from Sue-Ellen Case's perspective, draw on Freudian biases in conceiving their characters and place the male as a sexual subject in contrast with the female as the sexual “other.” (Case, Feminism, 123–124.) Recently, scholars have pursued a number of strands in the complex issue of modernists' attitudes toward gender and sexuality. These include Andreas Huysen's discussion of the contradictions inherent in the direct, forceful male misogyny in writers such as Strindberg and Eugene O'Neill and the modernists' attempt to put themselves in the role of the female and to use feminine imagery. Others have commented on the modernist hostility toward modern metropolises such as Berlin as dangerous feminine territory. See Huysen, Andreas, After the Great Divide (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1986), 49CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and Petro, Patrice, “Perceptions and Difference: Women as Spectator and Spectacle,” in von Ankum, Katharina, ed. Women in the Metropolis. Gender and Modernity in Weimar Culture (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1997), 41–66Google Scholar.
8. Although the Bernauer production has not received much historical attention, contemporary critics rated it much better than Max Reinhardt's now famous production.
9. Robert Wilson has explored the postmodern quality of A Dream Play in his 1998 production at the Stadsteatern Stockholm.
10. For an extensive discussion see Postlewait, Thomas, “Simultaneity in Modern Stage Design and Drama,” Journal of Dramatic Theory and Criticism 3 (1988): 5–30Google Scholar.
11. Harvey, David, The Postmodern Condition (Cambridge: Blackwell, 1990), 22Google Scholar.
12. The notion that subjective and objective reality are not clearly demarcated is widespread in modern culture. One finds a similar orientation in Henri Bergson's interpretation of space as a flowing transition of lines, as well as in the notion of independent artistic space expressed by Adolphe Appia and Edward Gordon Craig.
13. Stephen Heath has coined the term in regard to film theory. Heath, Stephen, Questions of Cinema (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1981), 25CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
14. Booth, Michael, Victorian Spectacular Theatre 1850–1910 (Boston: Routledge, 1981), 95Google Scholar.
15. Meisel, Martin, Realizations: Narrative, Pictorial and Theatrical Arts in Nineteenth Century England_(Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1983), 38Google Scholar. In the melodramas of the nineteenth century, writers such as Dion Boucicault devised a series of spectacular tableaux which synthesized strong visual effects and dramatic situations.
16. The pictorialism in A Dream Play is a reminder that Strindberg, much like Ibsen, drew on popular culture to achieve his “elitist art.”
17. I am following Egil Törnquist's analysis of the sequence of locations. Törnquist's analysis is informed both by Strindberg's final draft, which includes no scene divisions at all and a previous draft which indicates acts and scenes. Törnquist, Egil, Strindbergian Drama: Themes and Structures (Atlantic Heights, NJ: Humanities Press, 1982), 149Google Scholar.
18. For a detailed study on the disintegration of fin de siècle culture and society, see Schorske, Carl, Fin de Siècle Vienna (New York: Knopf, 1980)Google Scholar.
19. For example, Strindberg mentions in his diary on 18 November 1901 that the castle is based on his memories of a tower in a Stockholm Calvary barracks. Strindberg, August, Occult Diary, trans. Sandbach, Mary (London: Penguin, 1979), 320Google Scholar.
20. See also Sprinchorn, Evert, Strindberg as Dramatist (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1982), 156Google Scholar, and Steffen, Hans, “Die funktionale Strukturierung des Traumspiels von Strindberg,” in Formenwandel, eds., Müller-Seidel, Walter and Preisendanz, Wolfgang (Hamburg: Hoffmann und Campe, 1964), 410–425Google Scholar.
21. As in Appia's design for Orpheus and Euridice (Hellerau, 1913) and Craig's design for Hamlet (Moscow, 1912).
22. Berger, Peter, Facing up to Modernity (New York: Basic Books, 1977), 71Google Scholar.
23. Törnquist, Themes, 149.
24. In an earlier draft of the play, called The Seasons, this metaphor was even more clearly developed.
25. Jean-François, Lyotard, The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge, trans. Bennington, Geoff and Massumi, Brian (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1984), 81Google Scholar.
26. Sprinchorn, Strindberg, 166.
27. Karl, Frederick, Modern and Modernism: The Sovereignty of the Artist 1880–1925 (New York: Athenaeum, 1985), 240–241Google Scholar.
28. A Dream Play, 242.
29. Ibid., 199.
30. There is no evidence that this scenic realization was meant to be used in a realistic manner, with action restricted to the areas representing the locations on the stage. Strindberg's other suggestions for simplifying the set included the use of projections or a system of arches with backcloths behind them. However, as Gösta Bergman reports, the director Albert Ranft did not follow Strindberg's suggestions for the production at the Svenska Teatern. Instead, he commissioned the scene designer Grabow to produce a realistic set picture to stay within the realm of pictorialism. Bergman, Gösta,“Strindberg and the Intima Teatern.” Theatre Research 9 (1967): 18Google Scholar.
31. Bayerdörfer, Hans-Peter, Horch, Hans Otto and Schulz, Georg-Michael, eds., Strindberg auf der deutschen Bühne (Neumünster: Wachholtz, 1983), 42Google Scholar.
32. For an extended discussion of the nineteenth-century pictorialism see Meisel, Realizations, and Booth, Spectacular.
33. Bayerdörfer, Strindberg, 46.
34. For a more detailed study see my, “Strindberg's Post-Inferno Plays on the German Stage: Studies in Modern Spatial and Temporal Consciousness,” Ph.D. dissertation. Indiana University, 1993Google Scholar.
35. The play was produced 23 times before Hitler's rise to power.
36. Pasche, Wolfgang, Skandinavische Dramatik in Deutschland (Stuttgart: Helbing & Lechtenhahn, 1979), 277Google Scholar.
37. Poensgen, Wolfgang, Der deutsche Bühnen-Spielplan im Weltkriege (Berlin: Selbstverlag der Gesellschaft für Theatergeschichte, 1934), 58Google Scholar.
38. See appendixes with detailed listing of performance frequency and cast lists in van den Berg, “Strindberg,” 247–299.
39. Reinhardt staged a different version of A Dream Play a few months earlier at the Dramatisk Teatern in Stockholm, on 28 October 1921.
40. For an introduction to these cabaret performances see Senelick, Laurence, ed. Cabaret Performance. Vol.1: Europe 1890–1920 (New York: PAJ Publications, 1988)Google Scholar and Jelavich, Peter, Berlin Cabaret (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1993)Google Scholar.
41. Bernauer, Rudolf, Das Theater meines Lebens (Berlin: Blanvalet, 1955), 285Google Scholar.
42. For example, Easter, Queen Christina, Crimes and Crimes, The Crown Bride, and A Dream Play.
43. Rühle, Theater, 520.
44. Jacobsohn, Siegfried, “Ein Traumspiel,” Die Schaubühne 12(1916): 337Google Scholar.
45. Bernauer, Theater, 334. Bernauer cites as example the divine nature of the Daughter, who has to become a housewife.
46. Jacobsohn, , “Ein Traumspiel,” Die Schaubühne 12 (1916): 337Google Scholar.
47. Bark, Richard, Strindbergs drömspelteknik - i drama och teater (Lund: Studentlitteratur, 1981), 99–100Google Scholar.
48. Ibid., 99.
49. Ibid., 100.
50. According to this suggestion, the scenes of Act I would be stacked stage right, the scenes of Act II in the middle, and the scenes of Act III stage left, in front of the backdrop of the castle. In the draft of the play which Strindberg used as the basis for the sketches, the sequence from the castle to the first cave scene comprised Act I, the sequence from the Lawyer's chamber to the Mediterranean, Act II, and the repeated scenes of the cave, theatre corridor, and the castle, Act III. The prelude in heaven was not considered in the sketch.
51. Bark, Drömspelteknik, 102.
52. Richard Bark, who devotes a good deal of space in analysis to this aspect of the production, fails to make the connection to the postmodern, favoring a focus on the play's roots in the tradition of the nineteenth century.
53. The critic Norbert Falk pointed out that Reinhardt learned the vocabulary of expressionistic staging when he directed A Dream Play. Falk, Norbert, review of A Dream Play, Berliner Zeitung am Mittag, 14 December 1921Google Scholar. Rpt. in Rühle, Theater. 344.
54. Ibid., 344.
55. Reinhardt employed two different designers and went through the process of writing extensive promptbooks for each production. Nevertheless, the success of the Swedish performance may have encouraged Reinhardt to rework and transpose A Dream Play to Berlin because some of the reviewers, especially Bo Bergman, commended his directorial fantasy but criticized the set design by Alfred Roller. Kvam, Kela, Max Reinhardt og Strindbergs Visionaere Dramatik (Copenhagen: Akademisk forlag, 1974), 121–124Google Scholar.
56. Alfred Döblin, “Russisches Theater und Reinhardt” Döblin, Alfred, Ein Kerl muss eine Meinung haben. Berichte und Kritiken 1921–1924 (Freiburg: Walter, 1976), 33Google Scholar. Originally published in Prager Tageblatt, 20 December 1921.
57. Falk, “Review,” 344.
58. Sternaux, Ludwig, “Review of A Dream Play.” Berliner Lokalanzeiger, 12 December 1921Google Scholar. Rpt. in Rühle, Günther, Theater, 346.
59. Fechter, Paul, “Review of A Dream Play.” Deutche Allgemeine Zeitung, 15 December 1921Google Scholar. Rpt. in Rühle, Theater, 347
60. Kern, Stephen, The Culture of Time and Space 1880 1918 (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1983), 153–164Google Scholar.
61. The set design resembles Gustav Knina's well-known design for Max Reinhardt's production of Strindberg's The Ghost Sonata at the Deutsches Theater Berlin in 1916, which also used a facade, covered by dark veil, as a visual image for the hidden intricacies of human relationships.
62. Rühle, Theater, 15 and 25–27; Kvam,Reinhardt, 145.
63. de Certeau, Michel, The Writing of History, trans. Conley, Tom (New York: Columbia University Press, 1988), 89Google Scholar.