No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
NATURALISM AND THEISM
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 October 2020
Abstract
This article makes a case for theism by comparing it to naturalism. It examines the conflict between the two world-views, the nature of ultimate reality, the limits of science, the status of the universe, the role of faith in shaping beliefs, and how we account for human rationality. It concludes that naturalism is fatally flawed and that theism provides a more coherent explanation for human rationality and consciousness, the intelligibility of the universe and the existence of immaterial information.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy, 2020
References
Notes
1 Dawkins, R., The God Delusion (London: Transworld Publishers, 2006), 35Google Scholar.
2 Hawking, S., The Grand Design (London: Transworld Publishers, 2010), 32Google Scholar.
3 Kurtz, P., Philosophical Essays in Pragmatic Naturalism (New York: Prometheus Books, 1990), 12Google Scholar.
4 R. Lewontin, Review of Carl Sagan's Book The Demon Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark, New York Review of Books, 9 January 1997.
5 Ibid.
6 Nagel, T., Mind and Cosmos: Why the Neo-Darwinist Interpretation of the World is Almost Certainly False (New York: Oxford University Press, 2012), 5CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
7 Campbell, G., Lucretius on Creation and Evolution: A Commentary on De rerum natura 5.772–1104 (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2003), 4Google Scholar.
8 Gray, J., Straw Dogs (London: Granta Books, 2003), 26Google Scholar.
9 A. Plantinga, Conflict Resolution with Science, Interview by John Wilson, Christianity Today, 15 December 2011.
10 Nagel, Mind and Cosmos, 27.
11 Lewis, C. S., Miracles (New York: Simon and Schuster, Touchstone Books, 1996), 23–4Google Scholar.