Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-495rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-25T07:54:37.017Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

EQUALITY AND TENNIS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2016

Get access

Abstract

Men, it is sometimes alleged, deserve more prize money than women for winning tennis Grand Slams such as Wimbledon because they are required to play more tennis than women. Such an argument has two flaws. First, it is empirically unsound: the nature of tennis means women can and often do play more tennis than men; and second, the argument rests on a category mistake by confusing prize money with financial remuneration. Moreover, the focus on prize money neglects more fundamental issues of sexual inequality, in particular, why women do not face the same challenges as men at the Grand Slams.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

2 Kevin Mitchell ‘Novack Djockovic beats Rafael Nadal to win men's title’, The Guardian, 30 January 2012.

3 David Seminara ‘The day they belabored the point’, New York Times, 23 September 2009.

4 Jamie Jackson ‘Sam Stosur hits back in pay row with Gilles Simon’, The Guardian, 28 June 2012.