Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T21:11:22.294Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Military Orders in the Crusading Proposals of the Late-Thirteenth and Early-Fourteenth Centuries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 July 2016

A. J. Forey
A. J. Forey*
Affiliation:
University of Durham
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The most outstanding event in the history of the military orders at the end of the thirteenth and start of the fourteenth centuries was, of course, the dissolution of the Temple. This was not, however, an isolated happening. Although the accusations which led to the abolition of that order had been publicly voiced only shortly before the Templars‘ arrest, the proceedings against the Temple took place at a time when criticism of the military orders in general was mounting, and this growth of hostile opinion no doubt facilitated Philip IV's attack on the Templars. Ever since their foundation the military orders had been subjected to some criticism, but much early censure had been of a kind which might be directed against any religious establishment, especially by members of the secular clergy who found that their authority and resources were being impaired by the privileges which the military orders and other religious institutions enjoyed: it was not primarily concerned with the orders’ contribution to the struggle against the infidel. But as the fortunes of the crusading states declined, the military orders became increasingly criticised for their inadequacies as defenders of Christendom. Defeat in the Holy Land had to be explained by faults on the Christian side rather than in terms of Muslim superiority, and the military orders were an obvious target for attack. The authors of the numerous crusading proposals which were put forward in the late-thirteenth and early-fourteenth centuries were inevitably influenced by this growing criticism, and many crusading plans therefore included suggestions concerning the military orders. Those who drew up proposals did not themselves provide a reasoned or detailed account of the orders' faults or attempt to judge to what extent these failings contributed to Christian defeats, but the criticisms on which they based their plans were clearly not altogether groundless: although some strictures were ill-informed or excessive, the policies which the orders themselves pursued certainly provided a starting-point for the growth of hostile opinion. Yet some writers did not seek merely to remedy existing defects in the orders; they sought also to discuss what the role of the military order should be in the struggle against the infidel, and thus viewed the subject in a rather wider context.

Type
Articles
Information
Traditio , Volume 36 , 1980 , pp. 317 - 345
Copyright
Copyright © Fordham University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Various links between writers have been suggested: see, for example, Scholz, R., Die Publizistik zur Zeit Philipps des Schönen und Bonifaz’ VIII. (Stuttgart 1903) 387; Brǎtianu, G. I., ‘Le conseil du roi Charles: Essai sur l'internationale chrétienne et les nationalités à la fin du moyen ǎge,’ Revue historique du sud-est européen 19 (1942) 297, 317–318.Google Scholar

2 Delaville Le Roulx, J., Cartulaire général de l'ordre des Hospitallers de Saint-Jean de Jérusalem (1100–1310) I (Paris 1894) 266–268 doc. 391.Google Scholar

3 Matthew, Paris, Chronica majora III (ed. Luard, H. R., Rolls Series 57; London 1876) 177–179; idem, Historia Anglorum II (ed. Madden, F., Rolls Ser. 44; London 1866) 312–314; III (1869) 259; cf. Bulst-Thiele, M. L., Sacrae domus militiae Templi Hierosolymitani magistri: Untersuchungen zur Geschichte des Templerordens 1118/9–1314 (Göttingen 1974) 182–183.Google Scholar

4 Liber de recuperatione Terre Sancte 11, 48, 112 in Golubovich, G., Biblioteca bio-bibliografica della Terra Santa e dell'oriente francescano II (Quaracchi 1913) 15, 41, 59.Google Scholar

5 Councils and Synods, with Other Documents Relating to the English Church edd. Powicke, F. M. and Cheney, C. R. (Oxford 1964) II 1113.Google Scholar

6 Lib. de recup. Terre Sancte 49 (II 41 Golubovich).Google Scholar

7 Bulst-Thiele, , Sacrae domus, passim ; see also the same author's ‘Zur Geschichte der Ritterorden und des Königreichs Jerusalem im 13. Jahrhundert bis zur Schlacht bei la Forbie am 17. Okt. 1244,’ Deutsches Archiv für Erforschung des Mittelalters 22 (1966) 204–209.Google Scholar

8 La Règle du Temple, ed. de Curzon, H. (Paris 1886) 114, 126–127, 230, 299 caps, 145, 167–168, 421, 576.Google Scholar

9 Barcelona, Archivo de la Corona de Aragón, Gran Priorato de Cataluña, Casas Antiguas, pergaminos no. 46. Templars and Hospitallers in Aragon were not as anxious to reach a quick settlement, however, for the dispute dragged on for several years.Google Scholar

10 It is difficult, however, to accept the claim of Riley-Smith, J., Knights of St. John in Jerusalem and Cyprus, c. 1050–1310 (London 1967) 151–152 that ‘in nearly every political crisis the Hospitallers were royalist, the Templars baronial,’ and that ‘for reasons now unknown to us each Order seems to have adopted a consistent political philosophy.’Google Scholar

11 This explanation is found both in some detailed accounts of the siege and in general histories. See, for example, De excidio urbis Acconis in Martène, E. and Durand, U., Veterum scriptorum et monumentorum amplissima collectio 5 (Paris 1729) 766, 770–771; Bartholomew of Neocastro, Historia Sicula in RIS2 13.1182–1184; Annales de Dunstaplia in Annales monastici III (ed. Luard, H. R., Rolls Ser. 36; London 1866) 366; Eberhard, Annales in MGH SS 17.594.Google Scholar

12 See, among the more detailed works on the siege, not only Gestes des Chiprois (ed. Raynaud, G., Publications de la Société de l'Orient latin, sér. hist. 5; Paris 1887) 243–256, but also Thaddeus of Naples, Hystoria de desolacione et conculcacione civitatis Acconensis et tocius Terre Sancte in A. D. MCCXCI, ed. Riant, P. (Geneva 1873).Google Scholar

13 Tractatus de modo convertendi infideles, ed. Rambaud-Buhot, J. in Beati magistri R. Lulli opera latina III (Palma 1954) 101.Google Scholar

14 Epistola summo pontifici Nicolao IV pro recuperatione Terrae Sanctae, ed. Rambaud-Buhot, in ibid. 96.Google Scholar

15 Gottron, A., Ramon Lulls Kreuzzugsideen (Berlin 1912) 74. See also Blanquerna 80 (ed. Galmés, S., Barcelona 1947, II 152); Lectura super artem inventivam et tabulam generalem 316 in Beati Raymundi Lulli opera V, ed. Salzinger, I. (Mainz 1729); Desconort line 670 ed. Galmés, S. in Obres de Ramon Lull XIX (Mallorca 1936) 247; Disputatio Raymundi christiani et Hamar sarraceni 47 in Opera IV, ed. Salzinger, (Mainz 1729); Liber clericorum, edd. Alcover, A. and Obrador, M. in Obres I (1906) 385; Liber de acquisitione Terre Sancte in Longpré, E., ‘Le Liber de acquisitione Terrae Sanctae du bienheureux Raymond Lulle,’ Criterion 3 (1927) 270 and Kamar, E., ‘Projet de Raymond Lull “De acquisitione Terrae Sanctae,”’ Studia orientalia Christiana: Collectanea 6 (1961) 114; Liber natalis pueri parvuli Christi Iesu in Raimundi Lulli opera latina VI (ed. Riedlinger, H., CCL cont. med. 32.70); Petitio Raymundi in concilio generali ad adquirendam Terram Sanctam in Wieruszowski, H., ‘Ramon Lull et l'idée de la Cité de Dieu: Quelques nouveaux éerits sur la croisade,’ Estudis franciscans 47 (1935) 105.Google Scholar

16 Brǎtianu, , ‘Le conseil du roi Charles’ 356; Finke, H., Papsttum und Untergang des Templerordens II (Münster 1907) 118 doc. 75; cf. ibid. 51 doc. 34; Dubois, Peter, De recuperatione Terre Sancte, ed. Langlois, C. V. (Paris 1891) 13, 133; Baluze, E., Vitae paparum Avenionensium III (ed. Mollat, G., Paris 1921) 155–156.Google Scholar

17 Baluze, , Vitae III 150; Lizerand, G., Le Dossier de l'affaire des Templiers (Classiques de l'histoire de France au moyen ǎge 2; Paris 1964) 2–4; Delaville Le Roulx, J., Cartulaire général de l'ordre des Hospitaliers de Saint-Jean de Jérusalem III (Paris 1899) 597–598 docs. 4165–4166; IV (Paris 1906) 103 doc. 4680; Bartholomew Cotton, Historia anglicana (ed. Luard, H. R., Rolls Ser. 16; London 1859) 203–204.Google Scholar

18 Cotton, , Hist. angl. 203–204; Delaville Le Roulx, Cartulaire III 597–598 docs. 4165–4166. According to Nicholas IV the communis vox was demanding the amalgamation of the Temple and the Hospital.Google Scholar

19 Eberhard, , Annales in MGH SS 17.594 (Salzburg); Mansi 24.1079–1080 (Milan); John of Tielrode, Chronicon in MGH SS 25.581–582 (Sens, Reims); Cotton, , Hist. angl. 213–215 (Lyon, Aries); Councils and Synods II 1108, 1113 (London).Google Scholar

20 Baluze, , Vitae III 150; Lizerand, , Dossier 2–4; cf. Finke, , Papsttum II 13–14 doc. 11.Google Scholar

21 Finke, , Papsttum II 258–265, 294–302 docs. 132–133, 145–146.Google Scholar

22 Cotton, , Hist. angl. 214–215.Google Scholar

23 Councils and Synods II 1108, 1113.Google Scholar

24 See the works mentioned in n. 15 supra. Lull was not, however, always consistent in his statements on this point.Google Scholar

25 Brǎtianu, , ‘Le conseil du roi Charles’ 356, 360.Google Scholar

26 See, for example, Forey, A. J., ‘The Order of Mountjoy,’ Speculum 46 (1971) 259–264 for opposition to amalgamations involving a military order at the end of the twelfth and early in the thirteenth centuries.Google Scholar

27 Brǎtianu, , ‘Le conseil du roi Charles’ 358.Google Scholar

28 Gottron, , Kreuzzugsideen 78–79.Google Scholar

29 Ibid. 74.Google Scholar

30 Cap. 80 (II 152 Galmés).Google Scholar

31 Cotton, , Hist. angl. 213; MGH, SS 25.581–582.Google Scholar

32 Baluze, , Vitae III 150–154; Lizerand, Dossier 2–14; Delaville Le Roulx, Cartulaire IV 103–105 doc. 4680.Google Scholar

33 Later in the fourteenth century Philip of Mézières was confident that his proposed Order of the Passion would be able to provide both a vanguard and a rearguard; see Hamdy, A. H., ‘Philippe de Mézières and the New Order of the Passion,’ Bulletin of the Faculty of Arts, Alexandria University 18 (1964) 49.Google Scholar

34 See, for example, Prutz, H., Die geistlichen Ritterorden (Berlin 1908) 467; Barber, M., ‘James of Molay, the last Grand Master of the Order of the Temple,’ Studia monastica 14 (1972) 106.Google Scholar

35 Clément VI, 1342–1352. Lettres closes, patentes et curiales se rapportant à la France I (ed. Déprez, E., Bibliothèque des Écoles françaises d'Athènes et de Rome 3e sér. 3; Paris 1901) 129–132 doc. 341; Delaville Le Roulx, J., Les Hospitaliers à Rhodes jusqu’à la mort de Philibert de Naillac, 1310–1421 (Paris 1913) 125–126.Google Scholar

36 Baluze, , Vitae III 150; Lizerand, Dossier 4.Google Scholar

37 Finke, , Papsttum II 212–216 doc. 113; cf. ibid. 217–219, 230–238, 262–265 docs. 115, 125, 133; Vincke, J., Documenta selecta mutuas civitatis Arago-Cathalaunicae et ecclesiae relationes illustrantia (Barcelona 1936) 246–249 doc. 347. In the early-fourteenth century James II was also trying to ensure that the revenues of the military orders in Aragon were employed there and not sent out to the East. In 1304 he had attempted to persuade the pope to prohibit the dispatch of responsions by the Aragonese Templars and Hospitallers. See Finke, H., Acta Aragonensia I (Berlin 1908) 158 doc. 108; Salavert, V. y Roca, , Cerdeña y la expansión mediterránea de la Corona de Aragón II (Madrid 1956) 102 doc. 72. And when the fate of Templar property was being discussed a few years later, he stressed to his envoys at the papal court that ‘les dits bens foren donats per les predecessors del senyor rey al orde del Temple a defensio dela esgleya occidental e a offensio e impugnacio dels Sarrahins Despanya’: Finke, Papsttum II 230–238 doc. 125. It could therefore be suggested that any widescale amalgamation of the military orders would also have been opposed in Spain because of the fear that it would lead to a further diversion of resources from the peninsula to the East.Google Scholar

38 Finke, , Papsttum II 258–261, 294–302 docs. 132, 145–146.Google Scholar

39 Map, Walter, De nugis curialium 19, 20, 23 (ed. James, M. R., Oxford 1914, 29–31, 34–35); John of Salisbury, Policraticus 7.21 (ed. Webb, C. C. J., Oxford 1909, II 190–201); William of Tyre, Historia rerum in partibus transmarinis gestarum 18.9 in Recueil des historiens des croisades: historiens occidentaux I (Paris 1844) 833–834.Google Scholar

40 Pitra, J. B., Analecta novissima: Spicilegii Solesmensis altera continuatio II (Paris 1888) 409–411.Google Scholar

41 Chronica majora IV (1877) 291.Google Scholar

42 Councils and Synods II 815.Google Scholar

43 Ibid. 1106, 1112–1113; Cotton, Hist. angl. 208, 213, 215; MGH, SS 25.581.Google Scholar

44 After the Council of Vienne Philip IV stated that he had accepted Clement's rulings on the Temple partly because the pope had promised that measures would be taken to ensure that proper use would be made of the Hospital's resources: Lizerand, Dossier 200–202.Google Scholar

45 De recuperatione Terre Sancte (ed. Langlois, ) 13; cf. ibid. 91.Google Scholar

46 Meyer, P., ‘Les derniers troubadours de la Provence,’ Bibliothèque de l'École des Chartes 30 (1869) 497–498.Google Scholar

47 Le Roulx, Delaville, Cartulaire II 686 doc. 2517; Prutz, H., Entwicklung und Untergang des Tempelherrenordens (Berlin 1888) 283 doc. 7.Google Scholar

48 Forey, A. J., The Templars in the Corona de Aragon (Oxford 1973) 403 doc. 31; see also ibid. 138ff.; Luttrell, A. T., ‘The Aragonese Crown and the Knights Hospitallers of Rhodes: 1291–1350,’ English Historical Review 76 (1961) 7–9.Google Scholar

49 Le Roulx, Delaville, Cartulaire I 64 doc. 70; Strehlke, E., Tabulae ordinis theutonici (Berlin 1869) 426 docs. 665–666; Les Registres de Nicolas IV (ed. Langlois, E., Bibl. Éc. fr. Athènes, Rome 2e sér. 5; Paris 1886–1893) 614 docs. 4204–4206; Riley-Smith, , Knights of St. John 344–347.Google Scholar

50 Le Roulx, Delaville, Cartulaire IV 14–23 doc. 4549; Riley-Smith, , Knights of St. John 328.Google Scholar

51 Schottmüller, K., Der Untergang des Templer-Ordens (Berlin 1887) II 143–400; Perkins, C., ‘The Knights Templars in the British Isles,’ English Historical Review 25 (1910) 222. According to Amadi and Bustron there were 118 Templars in Cyprus at the time when members of the order were arrested, but this figure is still smaller than that for the British Isles: Chroniques d'Amadi et de Strambaldi I (ed. de Mas Latrie, R., Collection de documents inédits sur l'histoire de France; Paris 1891) 286; Chronique de l'ǐle de Chypre par Florio Bustron ed. de Mas Latrie, R. in Mélanges historiques V (Coll. doc. inéd. hist. France; Paris 1886) 167.Google Scholar

52 Forey, , Templars 340 n. 137; in 1329 Marino Sanudo estimated that the Hospitaller responsions totalled 180,000 florins, which is rather more than the amount specified at the chapter general in the following year: Bongars, J., Gesta Dei per Francos (Hanover 1611) II 315–316; Tipton, C. L., ‘The 1330 Chapter General of the Knights Hospitallers at Montpellier,’ Traditio 24 (1968) 300, 304.Google Scholar

53 Chronicles and Memorials of the Reign of Richard I I (ed. Stubbs, W., Rolls Ser. 38; London 1864) 305–306, 308–309; Otto of St. Blasien, Chronica in MGH, SRG 47.68; MGH, Epp. saec. XIII, 1.57–58 doc. 79.Google Scholar

54 The situation was no doubt made worse by the activities of impostors, who pocketed the alms which they claimed to be collecting in the name of the military orders: Forey, Templars 173; Delaville Le Roulx, Cartulaire III 556, 573–574, 587–588 docs. 4082, 4122, 4149.Google Scholar

55 Councils and Synods II 815.Google Scholar

56 Ibid. 1112.Google Scholar

57 Les Registres de Nicolas III (ed. Gay, J., Bibl. Éc. fr. Athènes, Rome 2e sér. 14; Paris 1898–1938) 51 doc. 167; Delaville Le Roulx, Cartulaire III 372–373 doc. 3674.Google Scholar

58 Councils and Synods II 1113; cf. ibid. 1106; Cotton, Hist. angl. 208—209.Google Scholar

59 Cotton, , Hist. angl. 215; Boutaric, E., ‘Notices et extraits de documents inédits relatifs à l'histoire de France sous Philippe le Bel,’ Notices et extraits des manuscrits de la Bibliothèque nationale et autres bibliothèques 20.2 (1862) 202.Google Scholar

60 Cotton, , Hist. angl. 213.Google Scholar

61 A survey of Hospitaller resources was undertaken in 1373 on the orders of Gregory XI: J. Glénisson, ‘L'Enquěte pontificale de 1373 sur les possessions des Hospitaliers de Saint-Jean de Jérusalem,’ Bibliothèque de l'École des Chartes 129 (1971–1972) 83–111; cf. Moyse, G., ‘Les Hospitaliers de Saint-Jean de Jérusalem dans le diocèse de Besançon en 1373,’ Mélanges de l'École française de Rome: Moyen-ǎge – Temps modernes 85 (1973) 455–514. See also the survey of Hospitaller lands in England made in 1338: Larking, L. B., The Knights Hospitallers in England (Publications of the Camden Society, old ser. 65; London 1857).Google Scholar

62 Forey, , Templars chaps. 4, 5; Perkins, ‘Knights Templars in the British Isles’ 213–214.Google Scholar

63 Le Roulx, Delaville, Cartulaire III 291–293, 760 docs. 3308, 4450; IV 48–49, 111–112 docs. 4588, 4686; Prutz, , Entwicklung 313–314; Larking, , Knights Hosp. 52, 129, 133, 201.Google Scholar

64 Prutz, , Entwicklung 313–314; Larking, Knights Hosp. 13, 21; cf. Cambridge Economic History of Europe I, ed. Postan, M. M. (Cambridge 1966) 556–559.Google Scholar

65 Le Roulx, Delaville, Cartulaire III 484–485, 486 docs. 3917, 3920; IV 23–24 doc. 4550; Forey, , Templars 62.Google Scholar

66 Apart from the limitations characteristic of all medieval administrations, there were also instances of serious corruption; on the activities of the Templar William le Bachelor in Ireland, for example, see Wilkins, D., Concilia magnae Britanniae (London 1737) II 346; Wood, H., ‘The Templars in Ireland,’ Proc. Royal Irish Acad. 26 (1907) 333.Google Scholar

67 Forey, , Templars 57–62; Ledesma Rubio, M. L., La encomienda de Zaragoza de la orden de San Juan de Jerusalén en los siglos XII y XIII (Zaragoza 1967) 110; Ubieto Arteta, A., El real monasterio de Sigena (1188–1300) (Valencia 1966) 69, 77.Google Scholar

68 Delaville Le Roulx, Cartulaire III 571–572, 734–735 docs. 4116, 4407–4408.Google Scholar

69 Glénisson, , ‘L’Enquěte pontificale de 1373’ 84, 106–107.Google Scholar

70 Larking, , Knights Hosp. 80. The largest Templar community in England in the early-fourteenth century seems similarly to have been at Denney, where the sick and aged were housed: Wilkins, Concilia II 346–347; Victoria County History, Cambridge and the Isle of Ely II (London 1948) 260–261. The return of unfit brothers to the West is mentioned in Règle du Temple 83 cap. 93.Google Scholar

71 Glénisson, , ‘L’Enquěte pontificale de 1373’ 84, 106–107.Google Scholar

72 Wilkins, , Concilia II 380–381; Larking, , Knights Hosp., passim. Google Scholar

73 Glénisson, , ‘L’Enquěte pontificale de 1373’ 100.Google Scholar

74 Such a view might seem to be borne out by what was said in Templar and Hospitaller admission ceremonies about fine horses, equipment, and food, and also by thirteenth-century Hospitaller decrees against excesses in clothing and equipment: Règle du Temple 338–339 cap. 661; Michelet, J., Procès des Templiers I (Coll. doc. inéd. hist. France; Paris 1841) 379; Delaville Le Roulx, Cartulaire II 536–561 doc. 2213 cap. 121; Riley-Smith, , Knights of St. John 257. But the clothing and equipment in question were probably sometimes brought by new recruits or provided by friends and relations: Règle du Temple 84–85, 113–114 caps. 96, 144; Michelet, , Procès I 186; II (1851) 360; Delaville Le Roulx, Cartulaire II 259 doc. 1652; III 75–77 doc. 3075 cap. 3. And inventories of Templar possessions drawn up after the arrest of the order's members usually reveal few signs of luxury, except sometimes in the Temple's chapels, where it might be taken as an indication of devotion rather than of extravagance: Rubió, J., d'Alós, R., and Martorell, F., ‘Inventaris inèdits de l'ordre del Temple a Catalunya,’ Anuari de l'Institut d'estudis catalans 1 (1907) 391–407; Wood, , ‘Templars in Ireland’ 348–349, 371–374; Perkins, C., ‘The Wealth of the Knights Templars in England and the Disposition of it after their Dissolution,’ American Historical Review 15 (1910) 254; cf. Michelet, , Procès I 43; Schottmüller, Untergang II 160.Google Scholar

75 Delaville Le Roulx, J., La France en Orient au XIV e siècle: expéditions du maréchal Boucicaut (Bibl. Éc. fr. Athènes, Rome 1e sér. 44–45; Paris 1886) II 3–6 doc. 1; idem, Cartulaire IV 203–204 doc. 4841; Finke, Acta Arag. I 494–496 doc. 329.Google Scholar

76 Forey, , Templars 141; Luttrell, , ‘Aragonese Crown and Knights Hospitallers’ 8–9.Google Scholar

77 Jean XXII (1316–1334): Lettres communes III (ed. Mollat, G., Bibl. Éc. fr. Athènes, Rome 3e sér. 1 bis; Paris 1906) 359–360 docs. 14214–14215.Google Scholar

78 MGH, SS 25.581; Forey, , Templars 403 doc. 31. In 1320 James II threatened to confiscate property to the value of 76,000 solidi from the Hospital in Aragon when it failed to provide the contingent demanded of it: Luttrell, ‘Aragonese Crown and Knights Hospitallers’ 8–9.Google Scholar

79 Ed. Langlois 13–15, 49–50, 103.Google Scholar

80 Mélanges historiques II (Coll. doc. inéd. hist. France; Paris 1877) 475–476; cf. Finke, , Papsttum II 258–261 doc. 132.Google Scholar

81 Boutaric, , ‘Notices et extraits’ 202–203.Google Scholar

82 Finke, , Papsttum II 182–184 doc. 101; Murimuth, Adam, Continuatio Chronicarum (ed. Thompson, E. M., Rolls Ser. 93; London 1889) 16; Geoffrey le Baker, Chronicon, ed. Thompson, E. M. (Oxford 1889) 5; Walsingham, Thomas, Historia anglicana I (ed. Riley, H. T., Rolls Ser. 28; London 1863) 127.Google Scholar

83 Clément VI: Lettres closes I 129–132 doc. 341.Google Scholar

84 Charles of Naples proposed that 2,000 knights should be maintained at the central convent: Brǎtianu, ‘Le conseil du roi Charles’ 358.Google Scholar

85 Ibid. 356.Google Scholar

86 Opera latina III 97; cf. Garcías Palou, S., ‘El candidato de Ramon Llull para el cargo de “Maestre General” de la “Orden Militar del Espíritu Santo,” Estudios lulianos 16 (1972) 63–77.Google Scholar

87 Line 671 (247 Galmés). The composition date of 1295 has been defended by Garcías Palou, S., ‘La fecha del “Desconhort” en relación con las visitas del Bto. Ramon Llull a la corte papal,’ Estudios lulianos 7 (1963) 79–87 and ‘Cronología de las cinco primeras estancias del Bto. Ramon Llull en la corte papal: Fecha del “Desconhort,”’ ibid. 10 (1966) 81–93; but see Hillgarth, J. N., Ramon Lull and Lullism in Fourteenth-Century France (Oxford 1971) 123–124.Google Scholar

88 Gottron, , Kreuzzugsideen 74. It has sometimes been suggested that Lull may have had in mind Philip IV or James II as the rex bellator: Kamar, ‘Projet de Raymond Lull’ 68–69; Giunta, F., Aragonesi e catalani nel Mediterraneo II (Palermo 1959) 103. But Lull stated that the post should be held by the son of a king: cf. Hillgarth, , Ramon Lull 66.Google Scholar

89 Longpré, , ‘Liber de acquisitione Terrae Sanctae’ 270–271; Kamar, , ‘Projet de Raymond Lull’ 114–115. Hillgarth, , Ramon Lull 105–106 argues that ‘Lull avoids entirely in this book his former concept of a “Bellator Rex” of royal blood, to be succeeded by other sons of kings’ and that he ‘deliberately excluded kings’ from the mastership. But when Lull writes ‘de regibus non est sic, quoniam uno mortuo forte filius illius non habebit talem devotionem ad Terram Sanctam sicut pater habebat, etiam aliqui optant terram acquirere propter filios,’ he seems merely to be contrasting the elective mastership with secular hereditary monarchies, and arguing that the struggle with the infidel cannot be left in the hands of the latter. Kamar, ‘Projet de Raymond Lull’ 70 maintains that in the Liber de acquisitione Terre Sancte Lull rejected the idea of hereditary succession envisaged in the earlier work; but it is clear in the Liber de fine that Lull was then thinking of an elected rex bellator. Google Scholar

90 Kohler, C., ‘Deux projets de croisade en Terre-Sainte, composés à la fin du xiiie siècle et au début du xive,’ Revue de l'orient latin 10 (1903–1904) 441.Google Scholar

91 Finke, , Papsttum II 114–119 doc. 75. Christian Spinola was presumably reporting a version of the same proposal when he informed the Aragonese king James II that Philip wanted to make one of his sons the king of a combined military order: ibid. 51 doc. 34.Google Scholar

92 Ed. Langlois, 133; Baluze, , Vitae III 155–156.Google Scholar

93 Opera latina III 96; Longpré, , ‘Liber de acquisitione Terrae Sanctae’ 269–271; Kamar, ‘Projet de Raymond Lull’ 110–115.Google Scholar

94 Gottron, , Kreuzzugsideen 76, 81.Google Scholar

95 Kohler, , ‘Deux projets de croisade’ 442–443.Google Scholar

96 Opera latina III 96.Google Scholar

97 Gottron, , Kreuzzugsideen 85–87.Google Scholar

98 The money which the master was to expend was usually said to be for the ‘sustenance’ of the Holy Land, but it is clear from the wording of some parts of the treatise that the master was to control expenditure during the crusade as well as after the Holy Land had been recovered: Brǎtianu, ‘Le conseil du roi Charles’ 357.Google Scholar

99 Opera latina III 97, 101; Wieruszowski, ‘Ramon Lull et l'idée de la Cité de Dieu’ 101; Golubovich, , Biblioteca I 374.Google Scholar

100 Gottron, , Kreuzzugsideen 74–75; Del consili 172–173, ed. Galmés, S. in Obres XX (1938) 262.Google Scholar

101 Opera latina III 96–97.Google Scholar

102 Gottron, , Kreuzzugsideen 88–89.Google Scholar

103 Longpré, , ‘Liber de acquisitione Terrae Sanctae’ 278; Kamar, ‘Projet de Raymond Lull’ 129–130.Google Scholar

104 Kohler, , ‘Deux projets de croisade’ 441. In the Liber de fine Lull wrote that the rex bellator should be assigned the kingdom of Jerusalem ‘quoniam iustum est propter hoc, quia nobilius officium habebit talis rex quam alius rex huius mundi’: Gottron, Kreuzzugsideen 74.Google Scholar

105 Longpré, , ‘Liber de acquisitione Terrae Sanctae’ 270; Kamar, ‘Projet de Raymond Lull’ 114; Disputatio Raymundi 47 in Opera IV (ed. Salzinger, ).Google Scholar

106 Kohler, , ‘Deux projets de croisade’ 442–443.Google Scholar

107 Gottron, , Kreuzzugsideen 82.Google Scholar

108 Trends in Medieval Political Thought, ed. Smalley, B. (Oxford 1965) 68–69.Google Scholar

109 Longpré, , ‘Liber de acquisitione Terrae Sanctae’ 270; Kamar, ‘Projet de Raymond Lull’ 114. The interpretation of the quoted passage suggested here differs from that given by Hillgarth, , Ramon Lull 106, who argues that terram refers to the Holy Land.Google Scholar

110 Brǎtianu, ‘Le conseil du roi Charles’ 358.Google Scholar

111 Gottron, , Kreuzzugsideen 82.Google Scholar

112 Ibid.; Wieruszowski, ‘Ramon Lull et l'idée de la Cité de Dieu’ 105.Google Scholar

113 Gottron, , Kreuzzugsideen 82.Google Scholar

114 Kohler, , ‘Deux projets de croisade’ 442–444.Google Scholar

115 Councils and Synods II 1111; cf. Dubois, De recuperatione Terre Sancte (ed. Langlois, ) 129–130.Google Scholar

116 Ed. Stroick, A., Archivum franciscanum historicum 24 (1931) 40. This passage is mistranslated by Throop, P. A., Criticism of the Crusade (Amsterdam 1940) 100–101.Google Scholar

117 Liber de recup. Terre Sancte 89 (II 58–59 Golubovich). In his Opusculum tripartitum 26 Humbert of Romans wrote that common opinion ‘sentit, equidem, quod ordinaretur, quod illis qui sunt ultra mare apti ad proelium, tam religiosi quam alii, adderetur tanta multitudo pugnatorum, tam equitum quam peditum, qui continue essent in hoc exercitio, quod speraretur probabiliter, quod possent semper contra Saracenos nostri prevalere. Ad hoc autem essent eligendi viri potentes ad hujusmodi labores et bonae vitae, et tales qui non solum ad stipendia oculum haberent, sicut mercenarii, sed fidei zelum haberent’: Brown, E., Appendix ad fasciculum rerum expetendarum et fugiendarum (London 1690) 205.Google Scholar

118 Kohler, , ‘Deux projets de croisade’ 442.Google Scholar

119 Gottron, , Kreuzzugsideen 82.Google Scholar

120 Kohler, , ‘Deux projets de croisade’ 442.Google Scholar

121 Lizerand, , Dossier 12–14; Baluze, Vitae III 153; Delaville Le Roulx, Cartulaire IV 105 doc. 4680.Google Scholar

122 Liber secretorum fidelium cruris super Terrae Sanctae recuperatione et conservatione 2.4.19 in Bongars, Gesta Dei II 74. In the fourteenth century the dispatch of mercenaries to the East was seen to have the further advantage that it would rid the West of companies of routiers: Delaville Le Roulx, France en Orient I 120–121.Google Scholar

123 Kohler, , ‘Deux projets de croisade’ 442; Lizerand, Dossier 12–14; Baluze, Vitae III 153; Delaville Le Roulx, Cartulaire IV 105 doc. 4680; cf. Gottron, Kreuzzugsideen 75 where it is pointed out by Lull that crusading money assigned to laymen was often diverted to other uses.Google Scholar

124 Kohler, , ‘Deux projets de croisade’ 440–441; cf. Dubois, De recuperatione Terre Sancte (ed. Langlois, ) 133, 140; Baluze, , Vitae III 155–156, 161.Google Scholar

125 Among those who had shown an interest in the kingdom of Jerusalem were the Aragonese. In 1295 James II was assigned Charles of Naples’ claim to Jerusalem as a pledge when the latter undertook to persuade the pope to cede Corsica and Sardinia to Aragon: Salavert y Roca, Cerdeña II 16–17 doc. 18. At the end of the first decade of the fourteenth century James's envoys were seeking to induce Robert of Naples to confer his rights to Jerusalem on James's brother, Frederick of Sicily: Finke, Acta Arag. II 701–702 doc. 440. And when a few years later James II married Mary of Cyprus, he was interested in the succession not only to Cyprus, but also to Jerusalem: Martínez-Ferrando, J. E., Jaime II de Aragón: su vida familiar (Barcelona 1948) II 47, 82, 93 docs. 70, 122, 137.Google Scholar

126 Riley-Smith, , Knights of St. John 222–224.Google Scholar

127 Delaville Le Roulx, Cartulaire IV 198–199 doc. 4831; Baluze, Vitae III 89–90. This choice was perhaps surprising, for Fitzpayn was an Englishman and at that time steward of Edward II's household: Tout, T. F., Chapters in the Administrative History of Mediaeval England VI (Manchester 1933) 42; but he was known personally to Philip, who presumably felt that French interests were less likely to be damaged by him than by the Hospitallers.Google Scholar

128 Petit, J., ‘Mémoire de Foulques de Villaret sur la croisade,’ Bibliothèque de l'École des Chartes 60 (1899) 605; Delaville Le Roulx, Cartulaire IV 107 doc. 4681.Google Scholar

129 Pauli, S., Codice diplomatico del sacro militare ordine gerosolimitano II (Lucca 1737) 31–33 doc. 25; Delaville Le Roulx, Hosp. à Rhodes 10–11.Google Scholar

130 Baluze, , Vitae III 148–149.Google Scholar

131 Delaville Le Roulx, Hosp. à Rhodes 12 maintains that the Hospitaller Grand Master Fulk of Villaret ‘se crut l'arbitre de la chrétienté dans le Levant,’ but he does not substantiate this claim. For Venetian initiatives, see Luttrell, A. T., ‘Venice and the Knights Hospitallers of Rhodes in the Fourteenth Century,’ Papers of the British School of Rome 26 (1958) 198, 203; Thiriet, F., La Romanie vénitienne au moyen ǎge (Paris 1959) 165–166. In 1345 the Hospitaller prior of Lombardy was named as capitaneus armate generalis, but this was only after some of the leaders of the Christian league had been killed: Clement VI: Lettres closes I 516 doc. 1675; Delaville Le Roulx, Hosp. à Rhodes 95–96.Google Scholar

132 Delaville Le Roulx, Hosp. à Rhodes 21–24, 53–56, 68–69; Tipton, ‘The 1330 Chapter General’ 298–299; Perkins, C., ‘The Knights Hospitallers in England after the Fall of the Order of the Temple,’ English Historical Review 45 (1930) 285–288.Google Scholar

133 Forey, Templars 278. Admittedly, it was said that some Hospitaller priories had a superfluity of knights in 1292, but at the end of the thirteenth century that order was not maintaining a large military establishment in the East: Delaville Le Roulx, Cartulaire III 608–609 doc. 4194 cap. 2.Google Scholar

134 Brǎtianu, ‘Le conseil du roi Charles’ 357.Google Scholar

135 Molinier, A., ‘Description de deux manuscrits contenant la règle de la Militia passionis Christi de Philippe de Mézières,’ Archives de l'orient latin 1 (1881) 335–364; Hamdy, ‘Phillippe de Mézières and the New Order of the Passion’ 1–105 passim. Google Scholar