No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 July 2017
1 Zeitschrift der Savigny Stiftung, Roman. Abt. 50 (1930) 272–294.Google Scholar
2 The first to suggest this was Beseler, Beiträge zur Kritik der römischen Rechtsquellen I (Tübingen, 1910) 99. Others, both preceding and following Levy's article, are listed by Volterra, Rivista di Storia di Diritto Italiano 8 (1935) 8, and by Levy, Medievalia et Humanistica 1 (1943) 18 note 15. Dissenters are listed by Levy, ibid. note 16.Google Scholar
3 ‘Vulgarization of Roman Law in the Early Middle Ages,’ Mediev. et Human. 1 (1943) 14–40.Google Scholar
4 Ibid. p. 26.Google Scholar
5 For some other Sentences see Levy, , Bullettino dell'Istituto di Diritto Romano 45 (1938) 148ff., Mediev. et Human. 1 (1943) 26 ff.Google Scholar
6 Lauria, , Annali della R. Università di Macerata 6 (1930) 33ff. Dissenters listed by Levy, , Mediev. et Human. 1 (1943) 20 note 26.Google Scholar
7 See Mediev. et Human. 1 (1943) 24.Google Scholar
8 Ztschr. d. Sav. St. 50 (1930) 291.Google Scholar
9 Buckland's suggestion, Law Quarterly Review 60 (1944) 364, that the epitome was made almost immediately after Paul's death, possibly by one of his own auditores, seems exaggerate in view of its decidedly unclassical vocabulary.Google Scholar
10 Cf. Mediev. et Human. 1 (1943) 25.Google Scholar
11 Cf. Mediev. et Human. 1 (1943) 39; see also Buckland, Law Quart. Rev. 61 (1945) 48.Google Scholar
12 Atti del Congresso Internazionale di Diritto Romano: Roma 1983, vol. I (Pavia 1934) 368f.Google Scholar