¹ For published additions to, and corrections of the lists in Repertorium der Kanonistik 243–56, 423–30, cf. Fransen, G. in Revue d'histoire ecclésiastique 49 (1954) 154–5; in this Bulletin for 1956, Traditio 12.566–8, and supra 481; Guizard, L. in L'Année canonique 2 (1954) 83 n. 31 (= Studia Gratiana 3. 27 n. 31); Kuttner, S. in Traditio 1 (1943) 293 n. 9, 305 n. 82, 320–7; 2 (1944) 495; 7 (1949/51) 304, 309–16, 319–21, 334; Miscellanea Giovanni Mercati (Città del Vaticano 1946) V 608 n. 2, 628 n. 29; Seminar 8 (1950) 61; Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte, Kan. Abt. 39 (1953) 422 n. 18; Legendre, P. in Revue historique de droit français et étranger ⁴ 34 (1956) 436 n. 1, 437–8; Stickler, A. in Salesianum 6 (1944) 113–40; 15 (1953) 604–12, and in this Bulletin for 1956, Trad. 12.602–3; Ullmann, W. Medieval Papalism (London 1949), 191, 200–1, 210–11; Vetulani, A., in Collectanea theologica 18 (1937) 451; Studia Gratiana 1 (1953) 279–82.Google Scholar

² Kunstmann, F., ‘Zur Geschichte des Gratianischen Decrets,’ Archiv für katholisches Kirchenrecht 10 (1863) 339–40. Neither this article nor the interpolation is mentioned by Friedberg in the prolegomena (on Mon. lat. 17161: p. xcv-vi) or the app. crit. for C. 3 fin. of the Decretum. Google Scholar

³ Cf. Traditio 12.602. Google Scholar

⁴ Our thanks are due to Fransen, G. for donating to the Institute a copy he made of fol. 4^r-4^v.Google Scholar

⁵ Munich lat. 16083, fol. 52^va-73^va; cf. Traditio 7. 315. Google Scholar

⁶ Thus, e. g., fol. 69^vb-70^ra from Honorius 1.4 de occultis and 1.12 de accusationibus; 71^va-72^ra from 2.1 de symonia; 72^va from 2.2 de heresi, etc. Google Scholar