¹ The most important studies are Léopold Delisle, “Notice sur les manuscrits du‘Liber Floridus’ de Lambert, chanoine de Saint-Omer,” Notices et extraits des manuscrits de la Bibliothèque nationale et autres bibliothèques 38 (1906): 577–791; Derolez, Albert, ed., Liber Floridus Colloquium: Papers Read at the International Meeting Held in the University Library Ghent on 3–5 September 1967 (Ghent, 1973); idem, Lambertus qui librum fecit: een codicologische studie van de Liber Floridus-autograaf (Gent, Universiteitsbibliotheek, handschrift 92), Verhandelingen van de Koninklijke Academie voor Wetenschappen, Letteren en Schone Kunsten van België, Klasse der Letteren 89 (Brussels, 1978); idem, The Autograph Manuscript of the Liber Floridus: A Key to the Encyclopedia of Lambert of Saint-Omer, CC Autographa Medii Aevi 4 (Turnhout, 1998). The edition is idem, ed., Lamberti S. Audomari canonici Liber Floridus: codex autographus Bibliothecae Universitatis Gandavensis (Ghent, 1968). A reproduction of the manuscript is now available online athttp://adore.ugent.be/view/archive.ugent.be:018970A2-B1E8-11DF-A2E0-A70579F64438. This paper was written with the support of the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation during my stay at the University of Marburg.Google Scholar

² See Derolez, , Autograph Manuscript, 185–89, with bibliography.Google Scholar

³ Thoroughly studied byDerolez, Albert, in idem, Die komputistischen Tafeln des Liber floridus, Mitteilungen und Verzeichnisse aus der Bibliothek des bischöflichen Priesterseminars zu Trier 16 (Trier, 2003).Google Scholar

⁴ See Fig. 1. On the LF calendar, seeWormald, Francis, “The Calendar of the Liber Floridus,” in Liber Floridus Colloquium, ed. Derolez, , 13–17, upon which I drew heavily. The calendar is reproduced inDerolez, , ed., Lamberti S. Audomari canonici Liber Floridus, 54–65.Google Scholar

⁵ E.g., Purificatio sanctę Marię for 2 February, Perpetuę et Felicitatis for 7 March.Google Scholar

⁶ Lamberti Audomariensis Chronica, MGH SS 5, 65–66, with additional notes from Martyrologium (i.e., calendar) at the end of p. 66.Google Scholar

⁷ E.g., some obits, like those of Balduinus rex Iherusalem, Athela ducissa Apulię, Ida comitissa Bolonię, and some others, but also some events of the first crusade as well as natural phenomena (ventus pestifer, whose start is indicated on 29 June 1113, and its end on 28 July).Google Scholar

⁸ Noted already byPiper, Ferdinand, Die Kalendarien und Martyrologien der Angelsachsen so wie das Martyrologium und der Computus der Herrad von Landsperg: Nebst Annalen der Jahre 1859 und 1860 (Berlin, 1862), 6. Translation by Wormald, , “The Calendar of the Liber Floridus,” 14: “The world was made, Adam formed, Christ announced and suffered. The sacrifice of Isaac, the Crossing of the Red Sea by the Children of Israel, and the Victory of St Michael over the Dragon.” The part after the words “adnunciatus et passus” is written in a smaller hand. An almost identical fragment occurs on fol. 2r; see n. 36 below.Google Scholar

⁹ Wormald, , “The Calendar of the Liber Floridus,” 16–17.Google Scholar

¹⁰ Ibid., 15.Google Scholar

¹¹ Sometimes the same sign marks entries other than those belonging to the twelve Fridays, but their share is negligible.Google Scholar

¹² See Fig. 2. I used a facsimile edition byHeitzmann, Christian and Carmassi, Patrizia, Der Liber Floridus in Wolfenbüttel: Eine Prachthandschrift über Himmel und Erde (Darmstadt, 2014), 106–8; the manuscript is also accessible online athttp://diglib.hab.de/?db=mss&list=ms&id=1-gud-lat.Google Scholar

¹³ Hereafter the following principles of edition are observed: all abbreviations are given in italics; the hardly legible or reconstructed characters are given in square brackets. The punctuation marks are introduced for ease of understanding, as are the capitals. When already existing editions are used, the texts are reproduced as they stand in the editions.Google Scholar

¹⁴ On the manuscript tradition of this text, seeIvanov, S. V., “The Legend of the Twelve Golden Fridays in the Western Manuscripts: Part I; Latin,” in Colloquia classica et indogermanica – V, Acta linguistica Petropolitana – VII, ed. Bondarko, N. and Kazansky, N. (St. Petersburg, 2011), 561–72.Google Scholar

¹⁵ Jasper, Detlev, ed., “Inveni in canonibus apostolorum … Zu einer mittelalterischen Fälschung auf Papst Clemens I.,” in Papsttum, Kirche und Recht im Mittelalter: Festschrift für H. Fuhrmann zum 65. Geburtstag, ed. Mordek, H. (Tübingen, 1991), 201–13, at 211.Google Scholar

¹⁶ The Fridays lists in this period are almost uniform, with the only slight difference concerning the eleventh Friday, which is sometimes said to be in prima, sometimes in secunda ebdomada decembris. For the sake of simplification I add here only those instances from the eleventh and twelfth century manuscripts that have the eleventh Friday in the first week of December, as in the LF calendar. These instances are: Bordeaux, Bibliothèque Municipale MS 11, fol. 144r, ed. Jasper, (as in the previous note); all the others unedited: BL, Additional 36736, fol. 87r; Vatican, Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana, Vat. lat. 4227, fol. 93r; Cambridge, Library of St John's College MS K. 23, fol. 77r; Cambridge, Library of Corpus Christi College MS 320, fols. 111v–112r; Benediktinerabtei Sankt Georgenberg-Fiecht, Stiftsbibliothek MS 113, fol. 29r; Paris, BNF Lat. 2774, fol. 36r.Google Scholar

¹⁷ Ivanov, , “The Legend of the Twelve Golden Fridays,” 561–62.Google Scholar

¹⁸ L'Enfant Sage: Das Gespräch des Kaisers Hadrian mit dem klugen Kinde Epitus, Gesellschaft für romanische Literatur 24 (Dresden, 1910), 87.Google Scholar

¹⁹ “Theme and Echo in an Anonymous Old English Homily for Easter,” Traditio 42 (1986): 115–42.Google Scholar

²⁰ A slight correction to this evidence is needed. The two French texts mentioned by Lees as occurring in two different manuscripts — “BNF fonds Latin 412” (in her description; rightly Fonds Français 412) and “MS Paris, Bibliothèque Impériale [Nationale] 7019” — are actually one and the same text and one and the same manuscript: seeIvanov, S. V., “The Legend of the Twelve Golden Fridays in the Western Manuscripts. Part I: Latin. Addenda et Corrigenda. Part II: Vernacular — II.1 French, II.2 Italian,” Colloquia classica et indogermanica – VI, Acta linguistica Petropolitana – X, ed. Kazansky, N. (St. Petersburg, 2014), 347–67, at 351–52.Google Scholar

²¹ Suchier, , L'Enfant Sage, 164–75.Google Scholar

²² Frederiksen, B. O., ed., “On the Clementine Text concerning the Twelve Annual Fast-Fridays,” in A Danish Teacher's Manual of the Mid-Fifteenth Century (Cod. AM 76, 8°), vol. 2, Commentary and Essays, ed. Frederiksen, B.O., Bergsagel, J., and Skog, I., Skrifter utgivna av Vetenskapssocieteten i Lund 96 (Lund, 2008), 182–227, at 187–88.Google Scholar

²³ Lees, , “Theme and Echo,” 128, followingMoland, Louis, “Calendrier français du treizième siècle: D'après les manuscrits 283 b. lettr. fr. de la Bibliothèque de l'Arsenal, 7851 et 7019³ fonds français de la Bibliothèque impériale,” Revue archéologique, nouvelle série, 3e année, 5e vol. (1862): 89–104.Google Scholar

²⁴ On dies egyptiaci, with extensive bibliography, seeChardonnens, L. S., Anglo-Saxon Prognostics, 900–1100: Study and Texts, Brill's Texts and Sources in Intellectual History 3 (Leiden, 2007), 330–52.Google Scholar

²⁵ Bischoff, Bernhard, “Das karolingische Kalendar der Palimpsesthandschrift Ambros. M. 12 sup.,” Colligere fragmenta: Festschrift Alban Dold zum 70. Geburtstag am 7.7.1952, Texte und Arbeiten: Abteilung 1, Beiträge zur Ergründung des älteren lateinischen christlichen Schrifttums und Gottesdienstes, Beiheft 2 (Beuron, 1952), 251.Google Scholar

²⁶ See the very useful summary with extensive bibliography, Borst, Arno, ed., Der karolingische Reichskalender und seine Überlieferung bis ins 12. Jahrhundert, Teil 1, MGH Antiquitates 3, Libri memoriales 2 (Hanover, 2001), 713–18.Google Scholar

²⁷ Read “Commento,” ibid., 714.Google Scholar

²⁸ Both in Muratori, L.A., ed., Rerum italicarum scriptores ab anno æræ christianæ quingentesimo ad millesimumquingentesimum, quorum potissima pars nunc primum in lucem prodit ex Ambrosianæ, Estensis, aliarumque insignium bibliothecarum codicibus (Milan, 1726), 2:1028and 1036.Google Scholar

²⁹ Cf. Borst, , ed., Der karolingische Reichskalender, 714–15; idem, Die karolingische Kalenderreform, MGH Schriften 46 (Hanover, 1998), 420.Google Scholar

³⁰ Piper, , Die Kalendarien und Martyrologien (n. 8 above), 17–21; Borst, , Die karolingische Kalenderreform, 419; idem, Der karolingische Reichskalender, 715–16.Google Scholar

³¹ Rose, Christine M., “March 27 as Easter and the Medieval Liturgical Calendar,” Manuscripta 30 (1986): 112–17; Borst, , Die karolingische Kalenderreform, 732.Google Scholar

³² Thus, all three calendars from Biblioteca Ambrosiana quoted above denote 18 March as the first day of the world (primus dies saeculi); cf.Bischoff, , “Das karolingische Kalendar,” 250; Piper, , Die Kalendarien und Martyrologien, 6.Google Scholar

³³ Piper, , Die Kalendarien und Martyrologien, 6–7.Google Scholar

³⁴ Borst, , Der karolingische Reichskalender, 716; idem, Die karolingische Kalenderreform, 222–23.Google Scholar

³⁵ On these seeWormald, , “The Calendar of the Liber Floridus,” 14; Der karolingische Reichskalender, 717.Google Scholar

³⁶ SeeWormald, , “The Calendar of the Liber Floridus,” 17: “Octavo Kalendas aprilis mundus factus est, et Adam plasmatus; et immolatio arietis pro Isaac facta est; et transitus filiorum Israel per mare rubrum fuit; et Christus adnuntiatus et passus; et victoria Michaelis archangeli cum dracone diabolo.”Google Scholar

³⁷ Krusch, Bruno, Studien zur christlich-mittelalterlichen Chronologie: Der 84-jährige Ostercyclus und seine Quellen (Leipzig, 1880), 348–49: “In quo mense [i.e., martio] eduxit Cain Abel iustum in campum ut occideret eum, in typo Christi educti ad praetorium Pilati in sexta feria; quia in eodem die conceptus in utero est et mortuus in cruce, dum in sexta feria mortuus est Adam in anima pro peccato in paradyso et in eodem die obiit in corpore.” Note that the reference to the murder of Abel is somewhat ambiguous since it may equally be understood as placing this event in the month of March, or on a Friday, or both.Google Scholar

³⁸ Walsh, Maura and Cróinín, Dáibhí Ó, eds., Cummian's Letter De controversia paschali and the De ratione conputandi, Studies and Texts 86 (Toronto, 1988), 88.Google Scholar

³⁹ Grässe, Johann Georg Theodor, ed., Jacobi a Voragine Legenda aurea: vulgo Historia lombardica dicta, 3rd ed. (Bratislava, 1890), 221:Google Scholar

Salve justa dies quae vulnera nostra coerces!Google Scholar

Angelus est missus, est passus in cruce Christus,Google Scholar

Est Adam factus et eodem tempore lapsus,Google Scholar

Ob meritum decimae cadit Abel fratris ab ense,Google Scholar

Offert Melchisedech, Ysaac supponitur aris,Google Scholar

Est decollatus Christi baptista beatus,Google Scholar

Est Petrus ereptus, Jacobus sub Herode peremptus,Google Scholar

Corpora sanctorum cum Christo multa resurgunt,Google Scholar

Latro dulcet amen per Christum suscipit. Amen.Google Scholar

⁴⁰ Although, it should be noted, it is quite close to the Epistola de Pascha by Ps.-Cyrillus, as well as later tradition, the Old English list must be a separate branch, very probably owing to the invention of an individual author who may have expanded it after his own fancy.Google Scholar