Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-20T16:19:10.924Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Transgenderism, Othering and Third Way Buddhist Monasticism in Chiang Mai, Thailand

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2024

Amnuaypond Kidpromma
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy and Religion, Chiang Mai University, Thailand
James L. Taylor*
Affiliation:
Anthropology & Development Studies, The University of Adelaide, Australia, Department of Social Science and Development, Chiang Mai University, Thailand
*
Corresponding author: James L. Taylor; Email: jim.taylor@adelaide.edu.au

Abstract

Religion and trans studies are a relatively new domain of study, one which surrounds subjects gendered and sexed as (religiously) “Other,” and in the articulation of such voices in a public space. In this paper we employ a case study of a transgendered monastic teacher named Khun Mae Tritrinn in northern Thailand to highlight a case of gendered religious “Othering,” and the construction of the third-way religiosity in the context of traditional hetero-patriarchal Buddhist monasticism. We refer to this thematic domain in the context of an emergent third-way religiosity; theorising in an experiential knowing of transgender subjects, which emerges from their trans-other lives. In the case study we show by resisting the gender binary of Buddhist monasticism how a particular transgendered person seeks a third-way monastic alternative; how she established her own hermitage and religious community, and manages the relationship between discourse and institutions that act upon and through her. The ethnographic focus sheds light on historical moments and voices that have been referred to elsewhere as forms of “subjugated knowledge” (Foucault 1980; Hartman 2000). However, despite being subject to religious Othering, recent trans-other identities have gained an increasingly de-subjugated and respected third-space alternative; an intelligibility and opening beyond a heteronormative binarism. It is argued that religious “thirding” creates a turning point for those seeking alternative spiritual bases, and as a salvific epistemology in an engaged religiosity and praxis.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Institute for East Asian Studies

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bhabha, Homi. 1994. The Location of Culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bomhard, Allan. 2021. “The two meanings of the Pāḷi Term paṇḍaka.” Available at : https://www.academia.edu/2210944/Bomhard_The_Two_Meanings_of_the_Pali_Term_pandaka_written_in_2013_revised_June_2021 (Accessed 03 March 2023).Google Scholar
Boonnoon, Charnarong. 2014. “Ham khon pen phra ham phra pen katoey (Editorial note, prohibit Katoey to be a monk and a monk to be Katoey).” Journal of Buddhist Studies Chulalongkorn University 21(2): 510.Google Scholar
Borch, Christian. 2002. “Interview with Edward W. Soja: Thirdspace, postmetropolis, and social theory.” Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory 3(1): 113120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buaban, Jessada. 2018. “Social acceptability of gay monks in Thai Theravada tradition.” Journal of Social Sciences 30(1): 1328.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1993. Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of “Sex.” New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chladek, Michael R. 2021. “Defining manhood: Monastic masculinity and effeminacy in contemporary Thai Buddhism.” The Journal of Asian Studies 80(4): 975995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Paul. 2000a. “A Buddha Kingdom in the Golden Triangle: Buddhist revivalism and the charismatic monk Kruba Bunchum.” The Australian Journal of Anthropology 11(3): 141154. doi:10.1111/j.1835-9310.2000.tb00053.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Anthony P., ed. 2000b. Signifying Boundaries: Anthropological Perspectives on Boundaries and Contested Values. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cohen, Paul. 2001. “Buddhism unshacked: The Yuan ‘Holy Man’ tradition and the nation-state in the Tai world.” Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 32(2): 227247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, Joanna. 2010. Meditation in Modern Buddhism Renunciation and Change in Thai Monastic Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1993. “Structure, sign, and play in the discourse of the human sciences.” In A Postmodern Reader, edited by Natoli, Joseph and Hutcheon, Linda, 223242. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Duangwises, Narupon. 2016. “Sex and masculinity in Buddhism and the control of sex among monks, novices and Pandaka.” Journal of Social Sciences Naresuan University 12(1): 325.Google Scholar
Fabian, Johannes. 1990. “Presence and representaion: The other and anthropological writing.” Critical Inquiry 16(4): 753772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faure, Bernard. 1998. The Red Thread; Buddhist Approaches to Sexuality. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1980. Power Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings. New York: Pantheon Press.Google Scholar
Gillespie, Alex. 2007. “Collapsing self/other positions: Identification through differentiation.” British Journal of Social Psychology 46(1): 579–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gyatso, Janet. 2003. “One plus one makes three: Buddhist gender, monasticism, and the law of the non-excluded middle.” History of Religions 43(2): 89115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Stuart. 1997. Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practice. London: Sage Publications & Open University.Google Scholar
Hartman, Ann. 2000. “In search of subjugated knowledge.” Journal of Feminist Family Therapy 11(4): 1923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooks, Bell. 2015. Yearning: Race, Gender, and Cultural Politics. New York, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jackson, Peter. 1996. “The persistence of gender: From ancient Indian Pandakas to modern Thai gay-Quings.” Meanjin (University of Melbourne) 55: 110120.Google Scholar
Jackson, Peter. 2020. “Beyond hybridity and syncretism: : Kala-Thesa contextual sensitivity and power in Thai religious and gender cultures.” Journal of Anthropology, Sirindhorn Anthropology Centre (JASAC) 3(1): 137.Google Scholar
Jirattikorn, Amporn. 2016. “Buddhist Holy Man Kruba Bunchum: The shift in a millenarian movement at the Thailand-Myanmar border.” Sojourn 31(2): 377412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawanami, Hiroko. 2001. “Can women be celibate? Sexual abstinence in Theravada Buddhism.” In Celibacy, Culture, and Society: The Anthropology of Sexual Abstinence, edited by Sobo, Elisa J and Bell, Sandara, 137156. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Kawanami, Hiroko. 2022. “Women's ordination”. In Oxford Handbook of Buddhism in Practice, edited by Arai, Paula and Trainor, Kevin, 405420. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, Henry. 1991. The Production of Space, translated by Nicholson-Smith, Donald. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
McDaniel, Justin. 2010. “Buddhists in modern Southeast Asia.” Religion Compass 4(11): 657668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Methangkun, Bunmi. 1986. Khon Pen Katoey Dai Yaang-rai (How can People be Ladyboy?). Bangkok: Abhidhamma Foundation.Google Scholar
Morris, Rosalind. 1994. “Three sexes and four sexulaities: Redressing the discourses on gender and sexuality in contemporary Thailand.” Position:Asia Critique 2(1): 1543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Conner, Richard. 1993. “Interpretating Thai religious change: Temples, Sangha Reform and social change.” Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 24(2): 330339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oldenberg, Hermann. 1882. Buddha: His Life, His Doctrine, His Order, translated by Hoey, William. Delhi: Motilal Barnasidass Publishers Private Limited.Google Scholar
Pattana, Kitiarsa. 2005. “Beyond syncretism: Hybridisation of popular religion in contemporary Thailand.” Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 36(3): 461487.Google Scholar
Pisith, Nasee. 2018. “Constructing the charisma of Khruba (Venerable monks) in contemporary Thai society.” Southeast Asian Studies 7(2): 199236.Google Scholar
Schedneck, Brooke. 2021. “The lay Buddhist gaze and femininity in Thai male monasticism.” South East Asia Research 29(4):417433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scherer, Bee. 2021. “Queering Buddhist traditions.” In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Religion, edited by Barton, John, 129. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Seeger, Martin. 2009. “The changing roles of Thai Buddhist women: Obscuring identities and increasing charisma.” Religion Compass 3(5): 806822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seeger, Martin. 2010. “'Against the stream': The Thai female Buddhist Saint Mae Chi Kaew Sianglam (1901-1991).” South East Asian Research 18(3): 555595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seeger, Martin. 2013. “Reversal of female Saint Khun Mae Bunruean Tongbuntoem.” Modern Asian Studies 47(5): 14881519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seeger, Martin. 2022. “The fragmentary history of female monasticism in Thailand: Community formation and development of monastic rules by Thai Mae Chis.” Religions 13(11): 1042. doi:10.3390/rel13111042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siobhan, Kelly. 2018. “Multiplicity and contradiction: A liturature review of Trans* studies in religion.” Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion 34(1): 723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soja, Edward. 1996. Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and Other Real-and-Imagined Spaces. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 1985. “The Rani of Sirmur: An essay in reading the archives.” History and Theory 24(3): 247272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, James. 1993. Forest Monks and the Nation State: An Anthropological and Historical in Northeastern Thailand. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Taylor, James. 2023. “When the ‘Buddha’s tree itself becomes a Rhizome': The religious itinerant, nomad science and the Budddhist state.” Religions 14(2): 177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Jami K., Haider-Markel, Donald P, and Lewis, Daneil C.. 2018. The Remarkable Rise of Transgender Rights. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thai-Rath, . 2013. “Bueng luek bud mai suek jazz miss Tiffany (In-deph look at the ordination for life of Jazz, Miss Tiffany),” 12 May. https://www.thairath.co.th/content/344402 (accessed 01 May 2023).Google Scholar
Thanissaro, Bhikkhu (DeGraff, Geoffrey). 2013a (Third Edition, Revised). The Buddhist Monastic Code, Vol. I. CA: Metta Forest Monastery.Google Scholar
Thanissaro, Bhikkhu (DeGraff, Geoffrey). 2013b (Third Edition, Revised). The Buddhist Monastic Code, Vol. II (The Khandhaka Rules Translated & Explained). CA: Metta Forest Monastery.Google Scholar
Vargas-Celtina, Gabriela, ed. 2013. Anthropology and the Politics of Representation. Alabama: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Vimala, Ven. 2021. “Through the yellow gate: Ordination of gender-nonconforming people in the buddhist Vinaya.” https://www.academia.edu/45662764/Through_the_Yellow_Gate_Ordination_of_Gender_Nonconforming_People_in_the_Buddhist_Vinaya.Google Scholar
Voyce, Malcolm. 2010. “Ideas of transgression and Buddhist monks, a system of prohibitions, with regulative and punitive functions.” Law and Critique 21:183198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wachirayaanwarorot (Wachirayan), Somdet Phra Mahaa Samanajao Krom Phraya. 1969. Vinayamukha, Vol. 1 (Entrance to the Vinaya). Bangkok: Mahaamakut Raatchawitthayaa Press.Google Scholar
Wijayaratna, Mohan. 1990. Buddhist Monastic Life: According to the Texts of the Theravada Tradition, translated by Grangier, Claude and Collins, Steven. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar