Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T05:38:39.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Origins of the Politics of the Parliamentary Middle Group, 1625–1629

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2009

Christopher Thompson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Only twice in the early seventeenth century, in 1624 and 1640, was the ‘political nation’ in England united. On both occasions, the determination of policy was surrendered by an unwilling king and the assistance of Parliamentary leaders sought. Both led to war and a sharpening of domestic political conflict. But such similarities were no more than superficial. The war which was envisaged in 1624 was foreign and external; the one which ensued in 1642 was civil and internal. In 1624, the co-operation of the Parliamentary leaders was freely solicited; in 1640, there was no alternative. The initiative which lay with Prince Charles and the Duke of Buckingham at the earlier date was in the hands of the Earl of Bedford, Pym and St John in November 1640. One was a prelude to the period of ‘Personal Government’, the other, ultimately, to that of the Commonwealth and Protectorate.

Type
Research Article
Information
Transactions of the Royal Historical Society , Volume 22 , December 1972 , pp. 71 - 86
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Historical Society 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Hexter, J. H., The Reign of King Pym (Cambridge, Mass., 1941)Google Scholar.

2 Pearl, V., ‘Oliver St John and the “middle group” in the Long Parliament: August 1643–May 1644’, English Historical Review, lxxxi (1966), pp. 490–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also Pearl, V., ‘The “Royal Independents” in the English Civil War’, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 5th Series, xviii (1968), pp. 69–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 Hexter, , Reign of King Pym, pp. 162–63Google Scholar.

4 Ibid., pp. 161–62.

5 Ibid., p. 164.

6 Hexter, , Reign of King Pym, p. 160Google Scholar.

7 Ibid., pp. 75–89, especially pp. 77–78.

8 ‘Letter from Mercurius Civicus to Mercurius Rusticus’, in Lord Somers' Tracts, ed. Scott, Walter (2nd edn., London, 1810), iv, p. 582Google Scholar.

9 Hexter, Reign of King Pym, passim.

10 Gardiner, S. R., England under the Duke of Buckingham and Charles I (London, 1875), i, pp. 6–7, 8–10Google Scholar.

11 Ball, J. N., The Parliamentary Career of Sir John Eliot 1624–1629 (Cambridge Ph.D. thesis, 1953), pp. 31–47Google Scholar.

12 Ibid., pp. 53–54, 62–63.

13 The Fortescue Papers, ed. Gardiner, S. R. (Camden Society, new series, i, 1871), pp. 196–97Google Scholar.

14 Gardiner, , England under the Duke of Buckingham and Charles I, i, pp. 20 n.2, 21 n.2Google Scholar.

15 British Museum, Harleian MS. 6987, fol. 200r

16 Ball, , Parliamentary Career of Sir John Eliot, p. 45Google Scholar.

17 Foster, E. R., ‘The Procedure of the House of Commons against Patents and Monopolies 1621–1624’, in Conflict in Stuart England, ed. Aiken, W. A. and Henning, B. D. (London, 1960), pp. 59–85Google Scholar.

18 Journal of the House of Lords, iii, p. 275.

19 Morgan, I., Prince Charles's Puritan Chaplain (London, 1957), pp. 25–26Google Scholar.

20 Ibid., pp. 74–76, 101–4.

21 Ball, Thomas, The Life of the Renowned Doctor Preston, ed. Harcourt, E. W. (London, 1885), p. 59Google Scholar; Morgan, , Puritan Chaplain, pp. 54–56, 60Google Scholar.

22 Ball, , Life of Preston, pp. 88–89Google Scholar.

23 Hacket, John, Scrinia Reserata: A Memorial Offer'd to the Great Deservings of John Williams D.D. (London, 1693), i, pp. 203–6Google Scholar.

24 Journal of the House of Lords, iii, p. 318.

25 Gardiner, , England under the Duke of Buckingham and Charles I, i, p. 152Google Scholar.

26 Ball, , Life of Preston, pp. 116–17Google Scholar.

27 Gardiner, , England under the Duke of Buckingham and Charles I, i, p. 187Google Scholar.

28 SirEliot, John, An Apologie for Socrates and Negotium Posterorum, ed. Grosart, A. B. (London, 1881), i, pp. 66–69Google Scholar.

29 The Commons' Debates in 1625, ed. Gardiner, S. R. (Camden Society, new series, vi, 1873), pp. 30–33Google Scholar; Eliot, , Negotium Posterorum, i, pp. 75–78Google Scholar.

30 The Commons' Debates in 1625, pp. 56–59.

31 Eliot, , Negotium Posterorum, i, pp. 110–13Google Scholar.

32 The Commons' Debates in 1625, pp. 77–89.

33 As his success on the 6th August shows. Many other examples could be given.

34 The Whole Works of the Most Rev. James Ussher D.D. Lord Bishop of Armagh and Primate of all Ireland, ed. Elrington, J. and Todd, J. H. (Dublin, 1847–1863), xvi, p. 395Google Scholar. The letter was one of introduction for Rich and Mr (later Sir) Thomas Crew.

35 The Commons' Debates in 1625, pp. 62–63.

36 Hacket, , Scrinia Reserata, ii, p. 18Google Scholar.

37 E.g., Journal of the House of Commons, i, p. 733. Cf. Notes of the Debates in the House of Lords 1624 and 1626, ed. Gardiner, S. R. (Camden Society, new series, xxiv, 1879), p. 3Google Scholar.

38 Essex Archaeological Society, Morant MSS, Volume 43, pp. 55, 59, 63; British Museum, Harleian MS. 6987, fol. 234v.

39 Bodleian Library, Tanner MS. 73, fol. 518r. Cf. British Museum, Additional MS. 41,616, fols. 26–35.

40 British Museum, Harleian MS. 390, fols. 229r, 234-rv, 237v, 239r, 240v, 247r, 251v, 263v, 265r, 268r, 271r, 288v, 289v, 291v–92r.

41 Morgan, , Puritan Chaplain, p. 27Google Scholar.

42 , J. and Venn, J. A., Alumni Cantabrigienses (Cambridge, 1924) Part I, ii, p. 137Google Scholar; iii, p. 449. By the autumn of 1626, the two families were on sufficiently intimate terms for Warwick, Sir Nathaniel Rich and Sir Francis Barrington to act as the advocates of one of Saye's sons in some abortive marriage negotiations. Calendar of State Papers Domestic, Addenda 1625–1649, pp. 724–25.

43 Hyde, Edward, Earl of Clarendon, The History of the Rebellion and Civil Wars in England (Oxford, 1958), ii, pp. 547–48Google Scholar.

44 Hacket, , Scrinia Reserata, ii, p. 17Google Scholar.

45 The Commons' Debates in 1625, pp. 90–91, 138–39.

46 Ibid., pp. 90, 137–38. On Eliot, see Ball, J. N., ‘Sir John Eliot a t the Oxford Parliament 1625’, Bulletin of the Institute of Historical Research, xxviii (1955), pp. 113–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

47 The Commons' Debates in 1625, p. 140.

48 He may, however, have had in mind the scheme he had formulated in 1623 for the pre-emption of tobacco and pepper by the king in return for the abandonment of impositions. See The Records of the Virginia Company of London, ed. Kingsbury, S. M. (Washington, D.C., 1906–1935), iv, pp. 27, 39Google Scholar.

49 Eliot, , Negotium Posterorum, ii, pp. 53–54Google Scholar.

50 British Museum, King's MS. 137, fol. 84.

51 The Commons' Debates in 1625, pp. 106–7.

52 The Works of the Right Reverend Father in God John Cosin, Lord Bishop of Durham, ed. Sansom, J. (Oxford, 1845), ii, p. 21Google Scholar; Ball, Thomas, Life of Preston, pp. 118–19Google Scholar; Bodleian Library, Tanner MS. 303, fols. 46v–47v; British Museum, Harleian MS. 6866, fols. 73r–81r. Cf. Sherland's comment. Cambridge University Library, MS. Dd XII. 20, fol. 20.

53 The whole debate is in Cambridge University Library, MS. Dd XII. 20, fols. 129–32.

54 Cf. Bodleian Library, Tanner MS. 73, fol. 518r. For a fragment of this scheme, see Public Record Office, 30/15/426.

55 Ball, Thomas, Life of Preston, p. 152Google Scholar.

56 Notes of the Debates in the House of Lords 1624 and 1626, passim.

57 Ball, J. N., Parliamentary Career of Sir John Eliot, p. 170Google Scholar. For Buckingham's hostility towards Pembroke, see Historical MSS Commission Report, Mar and Kellie MSS, Supplementary Report, p. 237.

58 Ball, J. N., ‘The Impeachment of the Duke of Buckingham in 1626’, in Mélanges Antonio Marongiu. Studies Presented to the International Commission for the History of Representative and Parliamentary Institutions, xxxiv (Brussels, 1968), pp. 38–41Google Scholar.

59 Cambridge University Library, MS. Dd XII. 21, fol. 136; 22, fol. 42.

60 Cambridge University Library, MS. Dd XII. 20, fol. 94; 21, fol. 175.

61 Huntington Record Office, Dd M 72, unnumbered MS (a xerox copy is in my possession).

62 Ball, J. N., ‘The Impeachment of the Duke of Buckingham in 1626’, Mélanges Antonio Marongiu, p. 46Google Scholar.

63 Gardiner, , England under the Duke of Buckingham and Charles I, ii, pp. 76–78, 84–87, 92–93Google Scholar.

64 Gardiner, , England under the Duke of Buckingham and Charles I, ii, pp. 173, 175–77Google Scholar.

65 Ibid., ii, p. 106.

66 Relf, F. H., The Petition of Right (Minneapolis, 1917), p. 4Google Scholar.

67 Ibid., pp. 22–23.

68 Ibid., pp. 61–62.

69 Notes of the Debates in the House of Lords 1621, 1625, 1628, ed. Relf, F. H. (Camden 3rd series, xlii, 1929), pp. 119–20Google Scholar. See ibid., p. 120 n. 1, for Conway's estimate of the Commons' intentions.

70 Relf, , Petition of Right, p. 27Google Scholar.

71 British Museum, Stowe MS. 367, fols. 143v–144v.

72 Relf, , Petition of Right, p. 28Google Scholar.

73 Ibid., p. 28.

74 British Museum, Stowe MS. 367, fols. 146r 147r–147v.

75 Ibid., fols. 147v–148r.

76 Ibid., fols. 150v–151v.

77 Ibid., fols. 152v–153r. Rich sent this speech together with that made by Warwick in the upper House on the 21st April to the Reverend Joseph Mede in Cambridge. British Museum, Harleian MS. 390, fols. 392r–393v, 394r–395v, 402r.

78 British Museum, Stowe MS. 367, fols. 155r–155v.

79 British Museum, Harleian MS. 1601, fol. 32v.

80 Ball, J. N., ‘The Petition of Right in the English Parliament of 1628’ in Album E. Lousse, iv (Louvain, 1964), p. 50Google Scholar.

81 British Museum, Stowe MS. 367, fols. 169r–169v, 175r–175v.

82 Ibid., fol. 178r.

83 Ibid., fol. 179r.

84 British Museum, Harleian MS. 390, fols. 394r–395r.

85 Relf, , Petition of Right, p. 41Google Scholar.

86 Ibid., p. 47.

87 Notes of the Debates in the House of Lords 1621, 1625, 1628, p. 189 n.5.

88 This can be gathered from Saye and Sele's speeches in the upper House. Ibid., pp. 171 n.4, 176.

89 British Museum, Sloane MS. 3317, fol. 25r.

90 The Commons' Debates in 1625, p. 26.

91 Hacket, , Scrinia Reserata, ii, pp. 144–45Google Scholar.