Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T11:37:20.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Other Face of Mercantilism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2009

Charles Wilson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

‘In England’, Sir John Seeley once wrote, ‘it is our custom to I alter things butto leave their names unaltered.’ Anyone who wished to test the truth of the dictum historiographically might examine the history of the word ‘mercantilism’. It has borne many, sometimes oddly conflicting, meanings, but they have had at any rate one thing in common: they have all been in some degree unpalatable to those reared in the traditions of English liberal thought. It was as the conspiracy of a mercantile minority out to line its pockets at the expense of the rest of the community that the system was first depicted by the classical economists. The interpretation of the German school of historical economists a century later was certainly no less distasteful to the liberal mind. To Bismarckian Germans it might appear seemly to condone the pursuit of aggression and covet its rewards. But even Chamber-lainites—like W. A. S. Hewins—amongst English historians had their doubts, and to George Unwin state ‘policy’ was simply a sham—the supreme illustration of the evils of bigness. The economic actions of the political body were not even the early thrustings of a lusty infant, but the morbid twitchings of disease. And Unwin, who believed that historians should be concerned with the life of communities, not with the actions of states, found more sympathizers in his profession (one suspects) than Cunning-ham, who was nearer to the German tradition. Others, misliking what they took to be the moral and intellectual confusion of mer-cantilists and their works, agreed to deny any title of coherence to folly so diverse and deplorable.

Type
Research Article
Information
Transactions of the Royal Historical Society , Volume 9 , December 1959 , pp. 81 - 101
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Historical Society 1959

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 81 note 1 SirSeeley, J., Science of Politics (1896), p. 298Google Scholar.

page 81 note 2 A. Smith, The Wealth of Nations, book iv.

page 81 note 3 See Judges, A. V., ‘The idea of a mercantile state’, Trans. Roy. Hist. Soc., 4th series, xxi (1939)Google Scholar.

page 82 note 1 Tawney, R. H., op. cit. (London, 1926), p. 268Google Scholar.

page 82 note 2 Beloff, M., op. cit., p. 18Google Scholar.

page 82 note 3 Roll, E., A History of Economic Thought (London, 1939), p. 99Google Scholar.

page 82 note 4 James, M., Social Policy during the Puritan Revolution (London, 1930), PP. 344–5Google Scholar.

page 83 note 1 Child, Harold, ‘Some English Utopias’, Transactions of the Royal Society of Literature, iii (1933)Google Scholar.

page 86 note 1 Quoted in Sutherland, J., Defoe (1950), p. 130Google Scholar.

page 86 note 2 Defoe, , Plan of the English Commerce (1728 edn.), p. 60Google Scholar.

page 87 note 1 Davenant, C., An Essay upon the Probable Methods of Making a People Gainers in the Balance of Trade. Collected Works, ii. 214Google Scholar.

page 88 note 1 Coleman, D. C., ‘Labour in the English Economy of the 17th Century’, Econ. Hist. Review, 2nd series, viii (1956)Google Scholar.

page 88 note 2 For an account of the depression of 1649 see evidence of Thomas Violet givenbefore Parliamentary Committee of enquiry, State Papers Dom., 1650, p. 178, no. 61. The evidence of depression is discussed in Wilson, C., Profit and Power (1957), pp. 147–9Google Scholar. For the depression of the late seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries see Beloff, , op. cit., ch. iii, esp. pp. 56–8Google Scholar. For a general discussion of the intellectual ferment of 1649 see Gooch, and Laski, , English Democratic Ideas in the 17th Century (Cambridge, 1927), esp. ch. viiGoogle Scholar.

page 89 note 1 Harleian Miscellany (London, 1744), i. 567Google Scholar. I am much indebted to Dr. Leon Fuz for allowing me to see the text of his doctoral thesis submitted at the Rotterdam Hogeschool in June 1951, in which he examines English welfare economics from Francis Bacon to Adam Smith.

page 89 note 2 See Turnbull, G. H., Hartlib, Drury and Comenius (Liverpool, 1947), pp. 65–6Google Scholar.

page 89 note 3 See Schenk, W.. The Concern for Social Justice in the Puritan Revolution (London, 1930), pp. 279–80Google Scholar.

page 90 note 1 Harleian Miscellany, iv. 366–70.

page 90 note 2 Quoted by Gregory, T. E. in ‘The Economics of Employment in England, 1660–1713’, Economica, i (1921–1922)Google Scholar. The pamphlet is, as stated above, of an earlier date than the Restoration.

page 90 note 3 See, for example, The Dutch Drawn to the Life (1664), ch. iv, esp. pp. 55–6.

page 90 note 4 Plockhoy is often referred to as Peter Cornelius (see Gooch, and Laski, , op. cit., pp. 117–8)Google Scholar; Schenk, (op. cit., p. 153Google Scholar) describes him as Peter Corneliez Plockboy.

page 90 note 5 E.g. SirHale, Matthew, Discourse Touching Provision for the Poor, 1683Google Scholar. Harford, R., Proposals for Building in every Country a Working Almshouse or Hospital as the Best Expedient to perfect the Trade and Manufactory of Linen Cloth, etc., 1677Google Scholar.

page 91 note 1 See John Cary, Essay in the State of England, etc.

page 92 note 1 See Hutchins, J. H., Jonas Hanway 1712–86 (London, 1940), pp. 47–75Google Scholar.

page 92 note 2 Abstract of Returns made by Ministers and Churchwardens of the Several Parishes and Townships of England and Wales. Ordered, by the House of Commons, to be printed, 1816.

page 93 note 1 Child, , New Discourse (1694), p. 84Google Scholar.

page 94 note 1 Figures from Beloff, op. cit., passim.

page 94 note 2 Darby, H. C., Historical Geography of England before 2800 (Cambridge, P. 524, fig. 83Google Scholar.

page 95 note 1 Jones, M. G., The Charity School Movement: A Study of 18th Century Puritanism in Action (Cambridge, 1938), passimGoogle Scholar.

page 96 note 1 See Leo Silberman's introduction (1957) to The Statesman, by Taylor, Henry, especially pp. xx to xxvGoogle Scholar. The original title of Little Dorrit was to have been Nobody's Fault.

page 96 note 2 E.g. Hampson, E. M., The Treatment of Poverty in Cambridgeshire (Cambridge, 1934), pp. 125–6Google Scholar.

page 96 note 3 Coleman, , ‘Labour in the English Economy of the 17th Century’, Econ. Hist. Review, viii (1956)Google Scholar.

page 97 note 1 Hartlib, Samuel, Legacy of Husbandry (London, 1655), p. 292Google Scholar.

page 97 note 2 See especially An Humble Proposal to the People of England in the Works (Oxford, 1841), xviii. 27, 41, 45Google Scholar.

page 97 note 3 Mandeville, B., The Fable of the Bees, ed. Kaye, F. B., 2 vols. (Oxford, 1924), i. 116Google Scholar.

page 97 note 4 Historical Account of the British Trade over the Caspian Sea (London, 1754), i. 421Google Scholar.

page 98 note 1 Oncken, A., Die Maxime Laissez Faire et Laissez Passer (Berne, 1886), pp. 87–9Google Scholar.

page 99 note 1 Turnbull, op. cit. See the same author's Samuel Hartlib. A Sketch of His Life and Relations to J. A. Comenius (Oxford, 1920)Google Scholar; also Brit. Mus., Sloane MSS. 654, fos. 345–8.

page 99 note 2 For the influence of immigrants on technology, etc., see, e.g., Cunningham, W., Alien Immigrants (Cambridge, 1897)Google Scholar.

page 100 note 1 Dobree, Bonamy, Restoration Comedy 1660–1720 (Oxford, 1924), p. 11Google Scholar.

page 100 note 2 Lectures on Modern History, (1930 edn.), p. 28.

page 100 note 3 Ibid., p. 16.

page 100 note 4 History and Human Relations (1951), p. 119.

page 100 note 5 June 1895.