Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-03T05:49:55.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Early Colonial Constitutions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2009

Extract

Our own constitutional history has been studied, and is still being studied, with all the thoroughness and patient care demanded by so great a subject. On the other hand, the early constitutional history of our colonies has attracted less attention than it deserves. Probably this is because the shadow of a great failure hangs over it; if alluded to at all, it is only to point a moral at the folly which lost the American colonies. And yet a system which, with all its shortcomings, played so large a part in preparing the way for the constitution of the United States, and for our own colonial empire as it at present exists, is certainly worthy of investigation. English colonial government may be said to have been founded in the American colonies, but not to have attained its full development, if it has yet done so, until after their separation. It is, therefore, not surprising that such attention as the subject has recently received should have been devoted to it by American rather than by English writers. I propose to-day to deal with the early forms of government established in the colonies, and to point out how some of them, as in Massachusetts, were calculated from the outset to make for separation, while others, as in Virginia, lent themselves readily to maintaining the connection with the mother country, and are still used in our existing colonies.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Historical Society 1896

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 61 note 1 Irish appeals first went to the King in Council; when the jurisdiction of the King in Council came to be divided between the King's Bench, the House of Lords, and the Privy Council, writs of error from Ireland lay to the King's Bench.

page 64 note 1 See the far-fetched arguments used on both sides in the discussion between Governor Hutchinson and the Massachusetts Legislature, reprinted in MrHosmer's, J. K. excellent ‘Life of Governor Hutchinson,’ Boston, 1896Google Scholar.

page 65 note 1 S. P. Col. vol. i. No. 11.

page 66 note 1 S. P. Col. 45.

page 71 note 1 See S. P. Col. (1677–1680).

page 76 note 1 S. P. Col. 1067.

page 79 note 1 Shower's, Parliamentary Cases, 32Google Scholar.

page 79 note 2 2 Peere Williams, 75–76.

page 79 note 3 Salkeld, 666.