Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-767nl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-14T13:45:11.418Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Miles in Armis Strenuus: The Knight at War

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2009

Extract

War was more important to medieval knights than to many of their historians. They have been more concerned to debate shifts in the social status and numbers of knights, than to examine their military role. Varied scenarios of knights rising in social status, gaining a more powerful political voice as they became wealthier, and of declining knights, increasingly aggrieved at their failure to maintain their position in society, have vied one with another. Military obligation has, of course, proved to be a battlefield on paper for many historians, but debate on this has not always been informed by awareness of the muddy realities of war. It would be reasonable to suppose that major transformations in the social position of English knights were a response to, or at least a reflection of, changes in their military functions. Yet the only link that is commonly made is the assumption that changes in the social position of English knights were in some measure the result of the rising costs of the military equipment they needed to possess.

Type
From Knighthood to Country Gentry, 1050–1400?
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Historical Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Brown, R. A., ‘The Status of the Norman Knight’, War and Government in the Middle Ages, ed. Gillingham, J. and Holt, J. C. (Woodbridge, 1984), 1832Google Scholar; Scammell, J., ‘The formation of the English Social Structure: Freedom, Knights and Gentry, 1066–1300’, Speculum 68 (1993), 598–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Fleming, D., ‘Landholding by Milites in Domesday Book: a Revision’, Anglo-Norman Studies, 13 (1990), 8398Google Scholar, points out that the milites of the late eleventh century might include not only heavy cavalry, but also light horsemen and infantry. My thanks are due to Clifford J. Rogers for his valuable comments on an earlier version of this paper.

2 Suppe, F. C., Military Institutions on the Welsh Marches, Shropshire, 1066–1300 (Woodbridge, 1994), 6387Google Scholar; Expugnatio Hibernica: the Conquest of Ireland, by Giraldus Cambrensis, ed. Scott, A. B. and Martin, F. X. (Dublin, 1978), 185Google Scholar; Pipe Roll 20 Henry II (Pipe Roll Soc., 1896), 67, 94, 132, 139Google Scholar; Pipe Roll 5 Richard I, ed. Stenton, D. M. (Pipe Roll Soc., 1927), 132Google Scholar.

3 La France de Philippe Auguste, ed. Bautier, R-H. (Paris, 1982), 583Google Scholar.

4 Public Record Office [hereafter PRO], E 101/3/10.

5 liber Quotidianus Contrarotulatoris Garderobiae, ed. Topham, J. et al. (1787), 232Google Scholar.

6 Morris, J. E., The Welsh Wars of Edward I (Oxford, 1901), 159, 163Google Scholar; liber Quotidianus Contrarotulatoris Garderobiae, 195 ff; Parliamentary Writs, ed. Palgrave, F. (18271834), II, 1. 401–8Google Scholar; British Library [hereafter BL] MS Stowe 553, f. 56. ff; PRO, E 101/20/25; PRO, E 36/204, ff. 102v, 103; PRO, E 101/393/11, f. 79.

7 Sherborne, J. W., ‘Indentured Retinues and English Expeditions to France, 1369–1380’, EHR 79 (1964), 722, 729–30, 732, 738Google Scholar; PRO E 101/32/30. The problem Gaunt faced in recruiting bannerets and knights is noted by Walker, S. K., The Lancastrian Affinity 1361–1399 (Oxford, 1990), 52Google Scholar.

8 Figures calculated from Nicolas, N. H., The History of the Battle of Agincourt (1827), 333–89Google Scholar.

9 Curry, A., ‘English Armies in the Fifteenth Century’,Arms, Armies and Fortifications in the Hundred Years War ed. Curry, A. and Hughes, M. (Woodbridge, 1994), 47Google Scholar; Jones, M., ‘John Beaufort, duke of Somerset and the French expedition of 1443’, Patronage, The Crown and The Provinces, ed. Griffiths, R. A. (Gloucester, 1981), 92, 100Google Scholar.

10 Prestwich, J O., ‘The Military Household of the Norman Kings’, in Anglo-Norman Warfare, ed. Strickland, M. (Woodbridge, 1992), 103Google Scholar.

11 Expugnatio Hibernica, 92–3; Rotuli de Liberate ac de Misis et Praestitis, ed. Hardy, T. D. (1844), 172253Google Scholar.

12 Walker, R. F., ‘Hubert de Burgh and Wales, 1218–1232’, EHR, 87 (1972), 475, 480Google Scholar.

13 BL MS Stowe 553, f. 56 ff.

14 Prince, A. E., ‘The Strength of English Armies in the Reign of Edward III’, EHR 46 (1931), 357, 368Google Scholar; Sherborne, , ‘Indentured Retinues and English Expeditions to France, 1369–1380’, 729–30Google Scholar; Ayton, A., ‘English Armies in the Fourteenth Century’, Arms, Armies and Fortifications in the Hundred Years War, 2930Google Scholar.

15 The most recent discussion of the battle tactics of the Norman period is Morillo, S., Warfare under the Anglo-Norman Kings 1066–1135 (Woodbridge, 1994), 169–74Google Scholar. See also Bradbury, J., The Medieval Archer (Woodbridge, 1985), 4157Google Scholar.

16 Vita Edwardi Secundi, ed. Denholm-Young, N. (1957), 124Google Scholar. It is worth noting that the references to mounted knights, ibid, 122, are not warranted by the Latin.

17 Rotuli Scotiae, ed. Macpherson, D., Caley, J., Illingworth, W. and Horne, T. H. (1814), i. 208Google Scholar.

18 Strachan, H., From Waterloo to Balaclava (Cambridge, 1985), 5591Google Scholar.

19 Hyland, A., The Medieval Warhorse from Byzantium to the Crusades (Stroud, 1994), 78Google Scholar. Gerald, of Wales, commented on the awkwardness of the high, curved saddle, which made swift mounting and dismounting impossible: Expungnatio Hibernica, 246Google Scholar.

20 L'Histoire de Guillaurm le Maréchal, ed. Meyer, P. (Société de l'histoire de France, 18911901), ii. lines. 16597–604Google Scholar.

21 L'Histoire de Guillaume le Maréchal, i. lines. 8845–9.

22 ‘I never spoke with an English lancer who had been engaged in the late Sikh wars that did not declare the lance to be a useless tool, and a great incumbrance in close conflict.’ Nolan, L. E., Cavalry; its History and Tactics (1853), 127Google Scholar.

23 Chroniques de J. Froissart, ed. Luce, S. (Paris, 18691975), v. 168Google Scholar.

24 The Historia Novella by William of Malesmesbury, ed. Potter, K. R. (1955), 49Google Scholar; Expugnatio Hibernica, 176–7.

25 Denholm-Young, N.History and Heraldry (Oxford, 1965), 1920Google Scholar.

26 Coss, P. R., Lordship, Knighthood and Locality. A study in English Society C.1180–C.1280 (Cambridge, 1991), 253–4Google Scholar; Crouch, D., The Image of Aristocracy in Britain 1000–1300 (1992), 147Google Scholar.

27 L'Histoire de Guillaume le Maréchal, i. lines 763–768.

28 Calendar of Liberate Rolls, 1251–1260, 212, 230, 259, 266.

29 Select Cases of Procedure without Writ under Henry III, ed. Richardson, H. G. and Sayles, G. O. (Seldon Soc., 60, 1941), 56Google Scholar; Select Cases in the Court of King's Bench, Edward I, iii, ed. Sayles, G. O. (Seldon Soc., 58, 1939), p. cv, n. 5Google Scholar.

30 Calendar of Inquisitions Miscellaneous, 1307–49, nos. 527, 797.

31 Chronique de Jean le Bel, ed. Viard, J. and Déprez, E. (Paris 1904), 156Google Scholar.

32 Brown, , ‘The Status of the Norman Knight’, 28Google Scholar, where it is suggested that to make a hauberk with butted, not rivetted, rings would take 140 hours.

33 Pfaffenbichler, M., Armourers (1992), 62–6Google Scholar, describes the technicalities.

34 Pipe Roll 2 John, ed. Stenton, D. M. (Pipe Roll Soc. 1934), 209Google Scholar; Pipe Roll 9 John, ed. Kirkus, M. A. (Pipe Roll Soc., ns. 22, 1944), 31Google Scholar.

35 Calendar of Liberate Rolls, 1251–1260, 380.

36 BL Cotton MS., Nero C. VIII, f. 57.

37 PRO, E 101/16/5.

38 Calendar of Inquisitions Miscellaneous, 1307–1349, no. 797.

39 Saul, N., Knights and Esquires: the Gloucestershire Gentry in the Fourteenth Century (Oxford, 1981), 24Google Scholar.

40 L'Histoire de Guillaume le Maréchal, i., lines 1368–1372, 4343–4414.

41 Davis, R. H. C., The Medieval Warhorse (1989), 7897Google Scholar, discusses the breeding of warhorses in medieval England.

42 Nolan, , Cavalry; its History and Tactics, 334Google Scholar.

43 The Ecclesiastkal History of Orderic Vitalis, ed. Chibnall, M. (Oxford, 19691980), iv. 218Google Scholar; Chronique de Jean le Bel, ii (1905), 103Google Scholar; Willelmi Rishanger Chronica et Annales, ed. Riley, H. T. (Rolls ser., 1865), 210Google Scholar.

44 Davis, , Medieval Warhorse, 82Google Scholar; Rotuli Litterarum Clausarum, ed. Hardy, T. Duffus (18331834), i. 171bGoogle Scholar; Documents Illustrative of English History in the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Centuries, ed. Cole, H. (1844), 238, 251Google Scholar. The livre of Anjou was worth about a quarter of the pound sterling.

45 Pipe Roll 12 John, ed. Slade, C.F. (Pipe Roll soc., 1951), 9, 200–1Google Scholar; Pipe Roll 11 John, ed. Stenton, D. M. (Pipe Roll soc., 1949), 198Google Scholar; Pipe Roll 13 John, ed. Stenton, D. M. (Pipe Roll soc., 1953), 200Google Scholar; Pipe Roll 16 John, ed. Barnes, P. M. (Pipe Roll soc., 1962), 155Google Scholar.

46 The Wardrobe Book of William de Norwell, 12 July 1338 to 27 May 1340, ed. Lyon, M., Lyon, B., Lucas, H. S., de Sturler, J. (Brussels, 1983), 216, 230–1Google Scholar.

47 Ayton, A., Knights and Warhorses. Military Service and the English Aristocracy under Edward III (Woodbridge, 1994), 194251Google Scholar.

48 BL. MS. Cotton Nero C. VIII, f. 281V.

49 Diplomatic Documents preserved in the Public Record Office, i., 1101–1272, ed. Chaplais, P. (Oxford, 1964), 14Google Scholar.

50 The Wardrobe Book of William de Norwell, cv, 230–1, 310–2.

51 Newhall, R. A., The English Conquest of Normandy (Yale, 1924), 191, 194nGoogle Scholar.

52 Ayton, , Knights and Warhmses, 229Google Scholar.

53 Chronici Rogeri de Wendover, ed. Hewlett, H., iii (Rolls ser., 1889), 62, 85–6Google Scholar; The Chronicle of Walter of Guisborough, ed. Rothwell, H. (Camden soc., lxxxix, 1957), 211Google Scholar.

54 L'Histoire de Guillaume le Maréchal, i. lines 1287–1302.

55 Materials for the History of Thomas Becket, ed. Robertson, J. C., iii (Rolls ser., 1877), 910Google Scholar; The Ecclesiastical History of Orderic Vitalis, ed. Chibnall, , ii, 31Google Scholar.

56 Barker, J. R. V., The Tournament in England, 1100–1400 (Woodbridge, 1986), 17, 58–61Google Scholar; Ayton, , Knights and Warhorses, 35–6Google Scholar.

57 Expugnatio Hibernica, 168–9.

58 L'Histoire de Guillaume le Maréchal, i. lines 1308, 1419–20, 2497–8.

59 The Chronicle of William of Rishanger of the Barons' Wars, ed. Halliwell, J. O. (Camden Soc, 1840), 45Google Scholar.

60 Prestwich, M. C., Edward I (1988), 45Google Scholar; Vita Edwardi Secundi, ed. Denholm-Young, , 52–3Google Scholar.

61 Bennett, Matthew, ‘La Règie du Temple as a military manual, or How to Deliver a Cavalry Charge’, Studies in Medieval History presented to R. Allen Brown, ed. Harper-Bill, C., Holdsworth, C., Nelson, J. L. (Woodbridge, 1989), 719Google Scholar; Marshall, G., Warfare in the Latin East, 1191–1291 (Cambridge, 1992), 159Google Scholar.

62 Mallett, M., Mercenaries and their Masters (1974), 148Google Scholar.

63 Chroniques de J. Froissart, v (1874), 46Google Scholar.

64 PRO, E 101/393/11, ff. 79–81, 84V.

65 Contamine, P., Guerre, état et société à la fin du moyen âge (Paris, 1972), 278CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

66 Chibnall, M., ‘Military Service in Normandy before 1066’, Anglo-Norman Warfare, ed. Strickland, , 35–6Google Scholar.

67 Round, J. H., Feudal England (1895), 206–8Google Scholar; Poole, A. L., Obligations of Society in the XII and XIII Centuries (Oxford, 1946)Google Scholar, argued unconvincingly against Round's case, by confusing constabularies of infantry troops with cavalry units, and suggesting that it was only the former that existed.

68 Holt, J. C., ‘The Introduction of Knight Service in England’, Angk-Norman Warfare, ed. Strickland, , 56Google Scholar.

69 Church, S., ‘The Earliest English Muster Roll, 18/19 December 1215’, Historical Research, 67 (1994), 816Google Scholar; PRO, E 101/13/35, no. 16.

70 Chroniques de Jean Froissart, v, 10, 76–7.

71 L'Histoire de Guillaume le Maréchal, i. lines. 4771–6.

72 Prestwich, M. C., War, Politics and Finance under Edward I (1972), 66Google Scholar; Liber Quotidianus Contrarotulatoris Garderobiae, 195, 197, 200; BL MS Stowe 553, ff. 56–62; PRO, E 36/204, ff. 99–100; E 101/393/11, ff. 79–81, 84V; Sherborne, J. W., ‘Indentured Retinues and English Expeditions to France, 1369–1380’, EHR, 79 (1964), 738Google Scholar. The inclusion of mounted archers in retinues is discussed by Ayton, , Knights and Warhorses, 1518Google Scholar.

73 Crouch, D., The Beaumont Twins. The Roots and Branches of Power in the Twelfth Century (Cambridge, 1986), 134CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

74 Crouch, D., William Marshal. Court, Career and Chivalry in the Angevin Empire 1147–1219 (1990), 138Google Scholar; Pollard, A. J., John Talbot and the War in France 1427–1453 (1983), 83101Google Scholar; PRO, C 81/1722/74; C 67/16.

75 The Scrope and Grosvenor Controversy, ed. Nicolas, N. H. (n.d.) i, 51, 53, 57, 74, 181–2Google Scholar.

76 Calendar of Patent Rolls, 1301–07, 121, 242; Calendar of Close Rolls, 1302–07, 66; Calendar of Close Rolls, 1313–18, 71; Johnstone, H., Edward of Caernarvon, 1284–1307 (Manchester, 1946), 116–17Google Scholar; Chronicles of the Reigns of Edward I and II, ed. Stubbs, W. (Rolls ser, 1882), i. 157, 267Google Scholar; Barrow, G. W. S., Robert Bruce and the Community of the Realm of Scotland (1965), 295–6Google Scholar. Giles', death features in the Vita Edwardi Secundi, 53Google Scholar; it is interesting that he had been involved along with the putative author, John Walwayn, in an attack on a manor in Suffolk in 1302; Calendar of Patent Rolls, 1301–7, 86.

77 Chibnall, M., ‘Mercenaries and the Familia Regis under Henry I’, Anglo-Norman Warfare, ed. Strickland, , 87–8Google Scholar.

78 Morgan, P., War and Society in Medieval Cheshire (Manchester, 1987), 52–3, 168–9Google Scholar.

79 The Chronicle of Jocelin of Brakelond, ed. Butler, H. E. (1949), pp. 32–3Google Scholar.