Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-06T14:32:05.809Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Progressive Movement in England

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2009

P. F. Clarke
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

On the centenary of the birth of C. P. Scott, the political outlook of the Manchester Guardian under his editorship was explained thus: ‘He, and those who wrote under him, thought always in terms of what he called “the progressive movement”. What was important was that those who were agreed on reforming measures should work together to secure them’. In its use of the rather imprecise label ‘progressive’, in its conception of a reform movement wider than strict party boundaries, in its distinctive flowering in the press—in all these respects the progressive movement of early twentieth-century America gives us some notion of what Scott had in mind. And indeed American historiography can, I believe, suggest valuable lines of analysis which have not been fully applied in England. Perhaps the most obvious would entail giving closer attention to the intellectuals and publicists and asking more searching questions about their role in politics. A few years ago the late Charles Mowat pointed to the broadly similar problems in social policy which Britain and the United States faced at this time; and he commented on how, despite these similarities, the history of social reform in the United States had been written with due attention to the history of ideas: in Britain, by contrast, almost exclusively in terms of political and administrative history. It would not, perhaps, be fair to extend Mowat's observation by saying that in England we purposely write history with the ideas left out.

Type
Research Article
Information
Transactions of the Royal Historical Society , Volume 24 , January 1974 , pp. 159 - 181
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Historical Society 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 C. P. Scott, 1846–1932. The Making of the ‘Manchester Guardian’ (London, 1946), p. 236 (probably by Hammond, J. L.)Google Scholar. In this paper I have restricted references to a bare minimum. I am very grateful to Dr J. A. Thompson for his criticism of an earlier draft; and my indebtedness to Mr Stefan Collini, for advising me in general, and in particular for bringing his understanding of L. T. Hobhouse to my aid, surpasses all reasonable limits.

2 Mowat, C. L., ‘Social legislation in Britain and the United States in the early twentieth century: a problem in the history of ideas’, Historical Studies, vii (1969), pp. 81–82Google Scholar.

3 See Progressive Review, i (1896–1897), pp. 75–77Google Scholar.

4 Ibid., p. 4; and see Porter, Bernard, Critics of Empire. British Radical attitudes to colonialism in Africa 1895–1914 (London, 1968), pp. 164–67Google Scholar.

5 Quoted in Gardiner, A. G., John Benn and the Progressive Movement (London, 1925), p. 212Google Scholar.

6 Hamer, D. A., John Morley. Liberal intellectual in politics (Oxford, 1968) p. 71Google Scholar.

7 See Richter, Melvin, The Politics of Conscience. T. H. Green and his age (London, 1964), esp. pp. 283, 341–42Google Scholar.

8 Fabian Essays in Socialism, ed. Shaw, Bernard (London, 1889), p. 148Google Scholar.

9 Hobhouse, L. T., The Labour Movement (London, 1893), p. 4Google Scholar.

10 Hobson, J. A., John Ruskin, Social Reformer (London, 1898), p. 204Google Scholar.

11 Leader, , Manchester Guardian, 23 02 1899Google Scholar.

12 Ibid., 25 March 1899.

13 Ibid., 23 February 1899.

14 Hobhouse, to Scott, 25 02 1899, Guardian archivesGoogle Scholar.

15 Leader, , Manchester Guardian, 23 02 1899Google Scholar.

16 See McBriar, A. M., Fabian Socialism and English Politics, 1884–1918 (Cambridge, 1962), pp. 29–47Google Scholar.

17 See Hobson, J. A., The Crisis of Liberalism. New issues of democracy, ed. Clarke, P. F. (Brighton, 1974), pp. xv–xviGoogle Scholar.

18 Samuel, Herbert, ‘The Independent Labour Party’, Progressive Review, i (1896–1897), p. 256Google Scholar.

19 (Clarke, William), ‘Introductory’, Progressive Review, i (1896–1897), p. 6Google Scholar.

20 Quoted in Wiener, Martin J., Between Two Worlds. The political thought of Graham Wallas (Oxford, 1971), p. 152Google Scholar.

21 Webb, Beatrice, Our Partnership, ed. Drake, Barbara and Cole, Margaret I. (London, 1948), p. 145Google Scholar. ‘Massingham of the Daily Chronicle is again our friend: the Manchester Guardian and the Echo are practically our organs through Leonard Hobhouse and W. M. Crook…’ (March 1898).

22 Hobhouse, L. T., ‘The ethical basis of collectivism’, International Journal of Ethics, viii (1898), p. 143Google Scholar.

23 Hobhouse, L. T., ‘Democracy and nationality’, The Speaker, 11 01 1902, p. 415Google Scholar.

24 See Atherley-Jones, L. A., ‘The New Liberalism’, Nineteenth Century, xxvi (1889), pp. 186–93Google Scholar; George W. E. Russell, ‘The New Liberalism: a response’, ibid., pp. 492–99; J. Guinness Rogers, ‘The Middle Class and the New Liberalism’, ibid., pp. 710–20; Haldane, R. B., ‘The New Liberalism’, Progressive Review, i (1896–1897), pp. 133–43Google Scholar; Hobson, J. A., Confessions of an Economic Heretic (London, 1938), p. 52Google Scholar. Professor Bentley B. Gilbert's claim (in his edition of Masterman, C. F. G., ed., The Heart of the Empire (Brighton, 1973), p. xxxv, n. 8)Google Scholar that the phrase was first used by Massingham in 1909 thus appears invalid.

25 Hobhouse, L. T., Democracy and Reaction, ed. Clarke, P. F. (Brighton, 1972). PP. 164–65Google Scholar.

26 Murray, to Hammond, 1 12 1901, Hammond Papers, vol. 30, fo. 4Google Scholar.

27 Quoted in The Political Diaries of C. P. Scott 1911–1928, ed. Wilson, Trevor (London, 1970), p. 29Google Scholar.

28 Leader, , Manchester Guardian, 7 07 1899Google Scholar.

29 ‘The career of Fabianism’, The Nation, 30 March 1907, p. 183.

30 Quoted in Searle, G. R., The Quest for National Efficiency (Oxford, 1971), PP. 94–95Google Scholar.

31 Hobhouse, , Democracy and Reaction, p. 228Google Scholar.

32 Ibid., p. 120.

33 Our Partnership, p. 472 (12 March 1911).

34 Hobson, J. A., ‘Ruskin and Democracy’, Contemporary Review, lxxxi (1902), p. 105Google Scholar.

35 Hobson, , John Ruskin, p. 208Google Scholar.

36 Hobson, J. A., ‘The General Election: a sociological interpretation’, Sociological Review, iii (1910), pp. 116–17Google Scholar.

37 Hobhouse, , ‘The ethical basis of collectivism’, p. 139Google Scholar.

38 Hobson, , Crisis of Liberalism, pp. 132, 182–83Google Scholar.

39 ‘The Government and the party’, The Nation, 1 June 1907, p. 514.

40 ‘Attractiveness in politics’, The Nation, 3 August 1907, p. 820 .

41 ‘The character of the Prime Minister’, The Nation, 29 June 1907, p. 653.

42 Buxton to Hammond, 22 September 1907, Hammond Papers, vol. 16, fos 76–77; and to Barbara Hammond, 12 November 1911, ibid., fos 157–58.

43 Morley to Hammond, 29 October 1911, ibid., fos 132–33.

44 A. M. D. Hughes to Hammond, 25 October 1911, ibid., fos 121–22.

45 Hobhouse, L. T., Liberalism (London, 1911), p. 224Google Scholar.

46 R. H. Tawney's Commonplace Book, ed. Winter, J. M. and Joslin, D. M. (Cambridge, 1972), pp. 45–46Google Scholar(2 December 1912); cf. Winter, J. M., ‘R. H. Tawney's early political thought’, Past and Present, 47 (05 1970), pp. 71–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

47 C. P. Scott, 1846–1946, p. 84.

48 Crisis of Liberalism, p. 95.

49 Cf. Hobhouse, , Liberalism, p. 165Google Scholar; Ginsberg, Morris, ‘The growth of social responsibility’, in Law and Opinion in England in the 20th Century, ed. Ginsberg, Morris (London, 1959), pp. 14–15, 18–19Google Scholar.

50 The Cambridge Union Society Debates, April 1910–March 1911, ed. Jackson, Gilbert E. and Vos, Philip (London, 1911), pp. 79–87Google Scholar.

51 Douglas, Roy, The History of the Liberal Party 1895–1970 (London, 1971), pp. 68–69, 289–90Google Scholar.

52 ‘Attractiveness in politics’, The Nation, 3 August 1907, p. 820.

53 ‘The moral of Jarrow’, The Nation, 6 July 1907, p. 684.

54 ‘The fear of socialism’, The Nation, 27 July 1907, p. 788.

55 See Petter, Martin, ‘The Progressive Alliance’, History, lviii (1973), pp. 45–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar; McKibbin, R. I., ‘James Ramsay MacDonald and the problem of the independence of the Labour party, 1910–1914’, Journal of Modern History, xlii (1970), pp. 216–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

56 Jones, Gareth Stedman, Outcast London. A study in the relationship between classes in Victorian society (Oxford, 1971), esp. pp. 316–18, 321Google Scholar.

57 ‘The General Election: a sociological interpretation’, p. 114. On the socio-economic division in 1910 see Blewett, Neal, The Peers, the Parties and the People. The General Elections of 1910 (London, 1972), esp. pp. 400–1, 404–5, 408–9Google Scholar. Developments in Lancashire are dealt with in Clarke, P. F., Lancashire and the New Liberalism (Cambridge, 1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, passim; which also argues (pp. 399–400) that the statistical evidence from London printed in Thompson, Paul, Socialists, Liberals and Labour. The struggle for London, 1885–1914 (London, 1967), pp. 299–303Google Scholar, is consistent with growing working-class support for the Liberal party, rather than with the author's contrary interpretation. DrBlewett's, discovery (op. cit., p. 481, n.44)Google Scholar of an important arithmetical error in these statistics now provides a conclusive demonstration, hitherto lacking, that Dr Thompson's inference must be unsound. In areas where Liberalism was traditionally strong, on the other hand, the picture may be different; see Morgan, Kenneth O., ‘The New Liberalism and the challenge of Labour: the Welsh experience’, Welsh History Review, vi (1973), pp. 288–312Google Scholar.

58 See Harris, José, Unemployment and Politics. A study in English social policy 1886–1914 (Oxford, 1972), esp. pp. 42–43, 349Google Scholar.

59 Jones, Stedman, Outcast London, pp. 335–36Google Scholar.

60 Hobsbawm, E. J., Labouring Men. Studies in the history of Labour (London, 1964)Google Scholar, for ch. 14, ‘The Fabians reconsidered’, esp. pp. 257–59, 266–67.

61 ‘The significance of the Budget’, The Nation, 20 April 1907, p. 285.

62 Hammond, J. L. et al. , Towards a Social Policy: or suggestions for constructive reform (London, 1905), p. 44Google Scholar.

63 See Hammond, J. L. and Hammond, Barbara, The Village Labourer 1760–1832 (London, 1911), p. 47Google Scholar.

64 See leaders, , ‘The Land Report’, Manchester Guardian, 15 10 1913Google Scholar; ‘Life in the Towns’, The Times, 4 April 1914. In 1907 E. G. Hemmerde had used the example of a minimum wage as a self-evident example of ‘a law which would bring the industry of the country to a standstill’. (Letter to Manchester Guardian, 27 February 1907.) In 1913–14 he signed the land reports.

65 Hamer, D. A., Liberal Politics in the Age of Gladstone and Rosebery (Oxford, 1972), p. 328Google Scholar; cf. Perkin, Harold, ‘Land reform and class conflict in Victorian Britain’, in The Victorians and Social Protest, ed. Butt, J. and Clarke, I. F. (Newton Abbot, 1973), esp. pp. 213–14Google Scholar.

66 Cf. Lee, Alan J., ‘Franklin Thomasson an d the Tribune’, Historical Journal, xvi (1973), p. 345Google Scholar; Neilson, Francis, ‘The decay of Liberalism’, American Journal of Economics and Sociology, iv (1944–1945), pp. 281–310Google Scholar.

67 Thompson, F. M. L., ‘Land and politics in England in the nineteenth century’, Trans. Royal Hist. Soc., 5th ser., xv (1965), p. 35Google Scholar; Perkin, , loc. cit., pp. 181, 208, 210–12Google Scholar.

68 See the concluding article in his series ‘Land and Labour’, a parallel exposition of the thinking of the Land Enquiry Committee, Manchester Guardian, 10 October 1913.

69 On this group see Swartz, Marvin, The Union of Democratic Control in British Politics during the First World War (Oxford, 1971)Google Scholar; and Cline, Catherine Ann, Recruits to Labour. The British Labour Party, 1914–1931) (New York, 1963)Google Scholar.

70 Scott Diaries, p. 320 (December 1917).

71 Scott to Hobhouse, 30 January 1918, ibid., pp. 331–32.

72 Hobhouse to Scott, 7, 9 and 15 November 1924, Guardian archives. Most of the first letter is printed in Scott Diaries, p. 468.

73 Scott to Hammond, 1 March 1923, Hammon d Papers, vol. 34, fo. 283.

74 Scott, to Hobhouse, 19 11 1924, Scott Diaries, p. 469Google Scholar.

75 The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money (1936), in The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes (London, 1971–), vii, pp. 383–84Google Scholar.

76 ‘My Early Beliefs’, (1938), ibid., vol. x, p. 448.

77 ‘Liberalism and Labour’, (1926), ibid., vol. ix, pp. 307, 309–10, 310–11.

78 ‘Am I a Liberal?’ (1925), ibid., vol. ix, p. 297; and see the previously unpublished remarks at pp. 295–96.

79 Wallas to Walter Lippman, 8 March 1928, quoted in Wiener, , Between Two Worlds, p. 193Google Scholar.

80 Hobhouse to Margaret Llewelyn Davies, June 1929, quoted in Hobson, J. A. and Ginsberg, Morris, L. T. Hobhouse. His life and work (London, 1931), p. 67Google Scholar.

81 See Hobson, , Confessions of an Economic Heretic, pp. 126, 181Google Scholar.

82 We Can Conquer Unemployment. Mr. Lloyd George's Pledge (London, 1929). PP. 53–54Google Scholar.

83 Labour's Reply to Lloyd George. How to Conquer Unemployment, with a preface by MacDonald, J. Ramsay (London, 1929), p. 13Google Scholar; and see Skidelsky, Robert, Politicians and the Slump. The Labour Government of 1929–31 (London, 1967)Google Scholar. The relation of Hobson to Keynes is an interesting question on which I hope to write further.

84 Scott, E. T. to Hammond, 16 11 1931Google Scholar, in Ayerst, David, ‘Guardian’ Biography of a Newspaper (London, 1971), p. 473Google Scholar.

85 Sinclair to Samuel, Herbert, 14 10 1933, quoted in Douglas, History of the Liberal Party, p. 235Google Scholar.